This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
206th Field Artillery Regiment article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Damon.cluck ( talk) 19:21, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Kinda confused by the Orphan Tag. I count at least six external links to this page:
Is there some minimum number required to avoid the Tag? Damon.cluck ( talk) 19:21, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
G'day, Damon. I've finished formating the citations now and have done a bit of a copy edit on the article. Can you please check to see that I haven't mucked anything up with the formatting? Apologies if I have. Anyway, a couple of suggestions I have for further improvement to take it up to a B class standard are:
Anyway, well done so far. Keep up the good work, sir ;-) — AustralianRupert ( talk) 15:48, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the help and the review, I will start working these issues! Damon.cluck ( talk) 03:22, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
This article is looking really good. I would suggest developing some sort of plan to increase the internal links to this page. Good pages are reviewed most often, when their are many links to the page. If you look at http://stats.grok.se/en/201006/206th_Field_Artillery_Regiment_%28United_States%29, you will see what I mean about low traffic. Article looks good though, I would suggest polishing it a little and moving it towards A-class or GA review. Sadads ( talk) 18:57, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
The article looks pretty good. I would recommend taking this article through one of the more rigorous review processed before FA such as WP:GA or Milhist's A-class review. I think the main thing that they will be brought up will be ensuring that you don't have too much explicit interpretative Original research. The reviewers will be much more picky then I am, Sadads ( talk) 20:20, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 05:17, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 05:17, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 05:18, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
206th Field Artillery Regiment. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 10:59, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on 206th Field Artillery Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:57, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on 206th Field Artillery Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:54, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
206th Field Artillery Regiment article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Damon.cluck ( talk) 19:21, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Kinda confused by the Orphan Tag. I count at least six external links to this page:
Is there some minimum number required to avoid the Tag? Damon.cluck ( talk) 19:21, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
G'day, Damon. I've finished formating the citations now and have done a bit of a copy edit on the article. Can you please check to see that I haven't mucked anything up with the formatting? Apologies if I have. Anyway, a couple of suggestions I have for further improvement to take it up to a B class standard are:
Anyway, well done so far. Keep up the good work, sir ;-) — AustralianRupert ( talk) 15:48, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the help and the review, I will start working these issues! Damon.cluck ( talk) 03:22, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
This article is looking really good. I would suggest developing some sort of plan to increase the internal links to this page. Good pages are reviewed most often, when their are many links to the page. If you look at http://stats.grok.se/en/201006/206th_Field_Artillery_Regiment_%28United_States%29, you will see what I mean about low traffic. Article looks good though, I would suggest polishing it a little and moving it towards A-class or GA review. Sadads ( talk) 18:57, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
The article looks pretty good. I would recommend taking this article through one of the more rigorous review processed before FA such as WP:GA or Milhist's A-class review. I think the main thing that they will be brought up will be ensuring that you don't have too much explicit interpretative Original research. The reviewers will be much more picky then I am, Sadads ( talk) 20:20, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 05:17, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 05:17, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 05:18, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
206th Field Artillery Regiment. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 10:59, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on 206th Field Artillery Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:57, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on 206th Field Artillery Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:54, 22 June 2017 (UTC)