![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
As you can see here, @ Y2edit? has started expanding the reactions section on the article and has added how the Indian social media and the opposition to the critisism responded to these comments. But, I guess, entire WP:CONSENSUS was reached yet on this topic. @ Rockcodder and @ Bookku's attention would be appreciated. >>> Extorc. talk(); 20:29, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
“The pathology of Islamophobia is growing throughout the West — it is taking its most lethal form in India,”
Chomsky also said that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s right-wing Hindu nationalist regime has sharply escalated the “crimes” in Indian-occupied Kashmir (IoK).
“The crimes in Kashmir have a long history,” he said, adding that the state was now a “brutally occupied territory and its military control in some ways is similar to occupied Palestine”.
The situation in South Asia, Chomsky said, was painful in particular not because of what was happening but because of what was not happening. There was, however, hope and opportunities to solve South Asian torment but not for long, he added.[1]
On the reactions sections in general: We have been allowing such sections in all controversial articles, but they are not encyclopaedic. No other encyclopaedias have "reactions" sections. Enlarging this to allow "debates" is going too far. And I would oppose that. As to the supposed violation of "neutrality", no it doesn't violate it. We are not ruling out either favourable reactions or unfavourable reactions. We only require that these be WP:THIRDPARTY views.
On the Chomsky reaction, I believe his comment was made in reaction to the hijab ban. Numerous newspapers presented it as such. You can find your favourite one among these and add it. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 10:37, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
, so should we remove all the, "reactions"?- Y2edit? ( talk) 18:15, 10 March 2022 (UTC)On the reactions sections in general: We have been allowing such sections in all controversial articles, but they are not encyclopaedic. No other encyclopaedias have "reactions" sections
"Education ministers in BJP ruled Himachal Pradesh and Tripura ... no plans for a uniform dress code."
"Sadhvi Pragya, an MP from the BJP, ... "no need to wear hijab anywhere" ... especially at educational institutions."
"Citizen group Bahutva Karnataka alleged ... controversy was perpetrated by members of Hindutva organisations ... coaxed, exhorted and threatened youth ... religious violence had occurred"
>>> Extorc. talk(); 12:36, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
As you can see here, @ Y2edit? has started expanding the reactions section on the article and has added how the Indian social media and the opposition to the critisism responded to these comments. But, I guess, entire WP:CONSENSUS was reached yet on this topic. @ Rockcodder and @ Bookku's attention would be appreciated. >>> Extorc. talk(); 20:29, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
“The pathology of Islamophobia is growing throughout the West — it is taking its most lethal form in India,”
Chomsky also said that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s right-wing Hindu nationalist regime has sharply escalated the “crimes” in Indian-occupied Kashmir (IoK).
“The crimes in Kashmir have a long history,” he said, adding that the state was now a “brutally occupied territory and its military control in some ways is similar to occupied Palestine”.
The situation in South Asia, Chomsky said, was painful in particular not because of what was happening but because of what was not happening. There was, however, hope and opportunities to solve South Asian torment but not for long, he added.[1]
On the reactions sections in general: We have been allowing such sections in all controversial articles, but they are not encyclopaedic. No other encyclopaedias have "reactions" sections. Enlarging this to allow "debates" is going too far. And I would oppose that. As to the supposed violation of "neutrality", no it doesn't violate it. We are not ruling out either favourable reactions or unfavourable reactions. We only require that these be WP:THIRDPARTY views.
On the Chomsky reaction, I believe his comment was made in reaction to the hijab ban. Numerous newspapers presented it as such. You can find your favourite one among these and add it. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 10:37, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
, so should we remove all the, "reactions"?- Y2edit? ( talk) 18:15, 10 March 2022 (UTC)On the reactions sections in general: We have been allowing such sections in all controversial articles, but they are not encyclopaedic. No other encyclopaedias have "reactions" sections
"Education ministers in BJP ruled Himachal Pradesh and Tripura ... no plans for a uniform dress code."
"Sadhvi Pragya, an MP from the BJP, ... "no need to wear hijab anywhere" ... especially at educational institutions."
"Citizen group Bahutva Karnataka alleged ... controversy was perpetrated by members of Hindutva organisations ... coaxed, exhorted and threatened youth ... religious violence had occurred"
>>> Extorc. talk(); 12:36, 22 March 2022 (UTC)