![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 3 December 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was redirect to 2022 FIFA World Cup. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 5 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
When can we edit the article? Simon 1996 ( talk) 11:50, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
It appears Russia 2018 has been over for almost 2 months now. Is there a timetable on this article's recreation? 2601:589:8000:2ED0:8493:743A:BBA0:DCEE ( talk) 00:38, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Support: most of the required information is available.-- Sakiv ( talk) 06:09, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
I have replaced the Goalscorers template with a module that works a similar way. I was unsure of how I could replace the number of goals with the actual total goals scored, so I left the note in lieu of my lack of knowledge with module coding. Is there any way I or anyone else can improve it?
Pinging S.A. Julio as the creator of the AFC goalscorers module to this discussion. Feel free to ping anyone else to this thread as well. Jalen Folf (talk) 00:14, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
|bold=no
should now work to override active players.|data1=
, |data2=
, etc. However, this would only work if the module was used for all the confederation qualifying competitions.
Jts1882 |
talk
10:45, 4 October 2019 (UTC)@ Jts1882: Thanks for fixing those small issues :) Sorry for not clarifying enough, we also need bold feature for this page. It seems like the current AFC module can take care of multiple group stages, we just count them as rounds and do not treat their groups separately. I think its structure is similar to the Euro 2020 qualifying module, and can be copied to all confederations; unfortunately I know almost nothing about programming templates and modules :( About merging data, please be noticed that if we plan to use modules for all confederal qualifications and the interconfederal playoffs, the playoffs module's data may overlap AFC-CONCACAF-CONMEBOL-OFC ones. Centaur271188 ( talk) 15:10, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
The updated and matches parameters do not work when we use templates, instead of invoking modules directly (see this article and CAF pages). Have they been merged so much that some changes in the module's code can affect the template? Centaur271188 ( talk) 08:52, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
|updated=
wasn't working (I used 'update') when parameters were supplied. It should be now. The matches parameter is used to calculate the average. Is the absence of "in x match(es)" what you are referring to?
Jts1882 |
talk
09:30, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
|bottom=
, |bottom_text=
and one with a single use (|intro=
). If there is a need for some sort of footer information I can add something. Feel free to add any suggestions for improvement. It's much easier to make the changes in lua than in the template language (especially when repeated 30 times).
Jts1882 |
talk
12:46, 7 October 2019 (UTC)BBC website saying Russia is banned from the world cup - where is best to update that? 141.92.67.43 ( talk) 10:52, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
A grid cartogram (where each country gets equal size) might be an improvement over a more accurately geographical rendering of countries. A typical map rendering obviously assigns vastly more space to some countries than others for reasons that don't help in communicating anything about those countries. It's particularly noticeable this year, in which the only federation that's qualified so far (the host Qatar) is barely a pixel on a typical map. But maps have some benefits over lists as they're easier to digest quickly.
I've taken a shot at creating a grid cartogram of FIFA federations, which is roughly similar to other attempts to tile map the world here, but with the expected differences for FIFA (the home nations, Puerto Rico, no Monaco, etc) and using FIFA's 3-letter country codes. Here's the result, with the same coloration for qualification status that we have on the world map.
Leaving here for feedback. If there are no concerns I'll clean it up and swap it in for the existing qualification map at some point. Simianvector ( talk) 20:23, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
I wrote it on the file's talk page, however as the discussion there may be inactive I write it here. What if teams who officially qualified with games still to play are shown in a colour another than those who qualified and won't play new matches (similarly to teams eliminated with games to play)? For example, it may be dark green. I would even consider a separate colour scheme for Qatar as they're hosts and don't participate in qualifiers (purple, for example). Of course, when qualification tournament concludes, these colours will no longer be in use.-- Joél be back ( talk) 05:59, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
@ 009988aaabbbccc, GazThomas402, Joél be back, and Walter Görlitz: What if we adopt the way we used for Euro 2020 qualifying? [3] Only "qualified", "can qualify" and "eliminated". I agree with Walter that "qualified with games to play" seems not very notable. So "eliminated with games to play" seems not very notable either. Also ping some editors who often update this kind of file in Commons. Centaur271188 ( talk) 13:34, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
I agree with removing the "games to play" section. For me it was always nonsensical. 009988aaabbbccc ( talk) 13:44, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
North Korea matches doesn´t count any more. FIFA declared them, nule. Please, don´t count goals and matches for totals. Fix it.-- 181.229.135.137 ( talk) 21:42, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Canada should be 2nd and USA should be 3rd. Canada is ahead of USA due to away goals in direct competition. These tie breaks are clearly explained in this article. 198.254.166.94 ( talk) 04:54, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
I suggest having overrall rankings like the Euro qualifiers on the UEFA page Cw131007 ( talk) 19:51, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I need to add some more information into the UEFA section. Minh Dang 1801 ( talk) 08:14, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
So in the map Slovenia is marked as color blue, indicating that they still have chance to qualify. They have currently 10 points and can get to max 16 points, while Croatia sitting in 2nd place has 17 points, making it impossible for Slovenia to qualify. Please change it's color to yellow, as I'm unable to do it myself. Pioter1936 ( talk) 07:24, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Nevermind then, thank you for correcting me. Indeed I don't really get how these Nation League group winners mechanics work, I'll now try and understand what they're about Pioter1936 ( talk) 07:32, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
A recent source has confirmed that OFC will begin qualification play in March 2022 and end in June 2022. Source is : https://www.republicworld.com/sports-news/football-news/fifa-world-cup-2022-how-many-teams-from-each-continent-can-make-it-to-qatar.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:283:4501:A340:DD96:96AD:E034:D172 ( talk) 06:16, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Serbia has only 2 consecutive appearances, they didn't feature at the 2014 world cup 178.148.184.222 ( talk) 15:41, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Russia is banned , but if they suddenly make it to the final (very unlikely, but suddenly) , then they can use their anthem or flag, is it after December 16? -- 212.164.204.182 ( talk) 04:03, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Czech Republic and Austria are eliminated from World Cup and Ecuador & Colombia have qualified to the World Cup. Please update the map if it surely happened. HONDA Gang (Talk) 15:24, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk page of the AFC fourth round article. Matilda Maniac ( talk) 01:02, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 ( talk) 12:20, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
– For consistency because this format already used in qualification articles (example 2022 FIFA World Cup qualification – CONCACAF Second Round & 2022 FIFA World Cup qualification – UEFA Group A) and also in all Olympics articles (example Athletics at the 2020 Summer Paralympics – Men's 100 metres. Hddty ( talk) 09:33, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
The map implies French Guiana is not a FIFA member. That's not all that accurate. The French Guianese CONCACAF team isn't part of FIFA, but its players can also play for the French team, which obviously is a FIFA member. 50.65.18.163 ( talk) 22:55, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
FIFA released that the OFC Draw will take place 29 November 2100 CET and have given more clarity on the qualifiers, i.e. American Samoa and Samoa have withdrawn from the qualifying, which will bring down the number of Nations Started to 9, and it also shared the format of the qualifying. Suvannixb ( talk) 09:14, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Canada had 100% qualified 207.6.108.116 ( talk) 21:18, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Russia has officially been disqualified, the page can be adjourned. Source https://www.newsweek.com/fifa-set-suspend-russia-football-2022-world-cup-report-1683272 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.23.225.204 ( talk) 17:50, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
@ 009988aaabbbccc, Chajusong, GazThomas402, and IAmBrazilian: Currently we have black (rgb 0-0-0, world PNG file [5]), red (rgb 255-0-0, world SVG file [6]) and a paler red (rgb 255-64-64, UEFA file [7]). I do not know about Wikipedia or Commons colour guidelines, but I think the 2 reds are somewhat annoying for readers, and we have only used red as a temporary colour ("eliminated with games to play", until we decided to simplify the map and abandon that section). Black has been the suspended/withdrawn colour since the beginning, so I would like to use it instead of red. Please comment, thanks :) Centaur271188 ( talk) 19:44, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Although Italy wins the Euro 2020 back and it was Eliminated in 2022 FIFA World Cup for 3rd Time Italy failed World cub it was lost by North Macedonia by 0-1 a former Yugoslav republic that has never qualified, and until this year never even came close this is the same happened in World cup 2018 in Russia that Italy is also eliminated since they eliminated first time in 1958.
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the figure Canada is in light blue indicanteing that it is not qualified yet, but in the same document in CONCACAF section it is qualified. it hould be in blue in the figure. 152.77.221.185 ( talk) 12:29, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Croatia was 3rd at 1998 world cup 179.56.48.190 ( talk) 13:17, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
@
Jkudlick: Hi, I open a talk here as you advised. Please be noticed that applying some teamwidth value is common for large tables (8 teams or more, I think). You can check out CONMEBOL tables from 2002, editors there use 110 or auto (1 and auto do the same job, the module will then choose the smallest possible value). 1998 and 2006 tables have default teamwidth value because they omit match results part and/or 'Qualification' column. The point here is trying to have enough space for 'Qualification' texts, so the tables look neater. If we have to break those texts, they should be broken least annoyingly ('2022 FIFA World Cup' or 'inter-confederation play-off' should be in one line), usually by using a nowrap. Normally we do not need it, the default teamwidth seems enough for 7-team-or-less tables and not too long team names - Bosnia and Herzegovina can fit, but Trinidad and Tobago will cause some trouble, so CONCACAF Hexagon tables of 2002 and 2018 also have teamwidths.
P/S: Never mind the strikethrough part :3 After some experiments, I realised most (or all) team names will fit in a normal table, even Turks and Caicos Islands (I do not know any longer one).
Centaur271188 (
talk)
19:59, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
This is text. | This cell does not have a linebreak. |
This is also text. | This cell has a forced linebreak. |
Here is more text. | Another cell with no linebreak. |
@ UltraBlazer: I do not know how that phrase became a Wikipedia's norm (it also looks like a Wikipedia's invention, a strict Google search from my PC provided results largely from our pages or pages quoting us directly [8], I assume that mostly nobody else refers to CONMEBOL qualifiers like that), I just think it is neither necessary nor proper. Round-robin is a format, not a specific stage, round or group; including it in the table is an inconsistency to me. Centaur271188 ( talk) 17:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
A sentence in the lead says that there was "no preliminary draw," and that individual confederations held their own draws, in contrast to other WC qualifiers. I cannot find support for this statement in the citation ( https://www.espn.com/soccer/fifa-world-cup/story/3860182/2022-world-cup-how-qualifying-works-around-the-world) or anywhere on line. On the contrary: (1) Preliminary draws for WC qualifiers seem to be only for the purpose of deciding inter-confederation matchups, and there was indeed such a preliminary draw for the 2022 WC qualifiers, as our article 2022 FIFA World Cup qualification (inter-confederation play-offs) notes: "The draw for the inter-confederation play-offs was held on 26 November 2021, 17:00 CET, in Zürich, Switzerland." (2) In other WC qualification years, the individual confederations always have had their own draws to determine how they place teams in their qualifying tournaments. At a minimum, this sentence needs to be rewritten and it needs a new citation. The citation says nothing about whether there was a preliminary draw for WC 2022 qualifying and it says nothing about how any of the facts purported in this sentence were different from previous World Cup qualifying tournaments. It would probably be best to delete the entire sentence unless someone can explain, with citation, what exactly the intended meaning was. Holy ( talk) 20:12, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Talk:2022 FIFA World Cup#Map regarding the terms "suspended" vs. "disqualified" in regards to Russia, and the exact terminology to be used in the map. I am of the opinion that both maps should be the same, which may be most easily solved by transcluding the map from one into the other, much like transcluding a template or section of prose. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 13:47, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change the time range of the 2022 FIFA World Cup Qualification from Thursday, June 6 2019 - Thursday, September 22, 2022 to Thursday, June 6 2019 - Tuesday, June 14 2022 Dieplsdieplsdie ( talk) 20:16, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
@ Island92, PeeJay, and S.A. Julio: Hi, I and PeeJay have an issue about how to sort it. For teams qualified on the same day, he would like to use 'Qualification method' column (winners -> runners-up -> etc.; or A -> B -> etc.), while I prefer the old chronological order. @PeeJay: you may think the hours or minutes difference between those teams is not very relevant or important, but some sources are still aware of that detail, so our sorting could be too. E.g. [9] (title - "Spain, Serbia 8th and 9th qualified teams for 2022 World Cup"), [10] (title and content mention USA before Mexico). Centaur271188 ( talk) 02:36, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
|addkey=
parameter. This would allow for teams which qualified on the same date to be sorted by time without altering the look of the table. —
Jkudlick ⚓
(talk)
19:06, 1 July 2022 (UTC)Qualifying will end on September 22, not September 21. fix it. 212.164.205.154 ( talk) 13:36, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Norway didn't withdraw from the tournament, they actually voted against the suggestion 2A00:23C6:C70C:5201:C199:7EF7:E4F7:B22 ( talk) 11:04, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Moroccan-Sahara4ever ( talk) 19:10, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Correct Morocco map including southern part of Morocco
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 3 December 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was redirect to 2022 FIFA World Cup. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 5 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
When can we edit the article? Simon 1996 ( talk) 11:50, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
It appears Russia 2018 has been over for almost 2 months now. Is there a timetable on this article's recreation? 2601:589:8000:2ED0:8493:743A:BBA0:DCEE ( talk) 00:38, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Support: most of the required information is available.-- Sakiv ( talk) 06:09, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
I have replaced the Goalscorers template with a module that works a similar way. I was unsure of how I could replace the number of goals with the actual total goals scored, so I left the note in lieu of my lack of knowledge with module coding. Is there any way I or anyone else can improve it?
Pinging S.A. Julio as the creator of the AFC goalscorers module to this discussion. Feel free to ping anyone else to this thread as well. Jalen Folf (talk) 00:14, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
|bold=no
should now work to override active players.|data1=
, |data2=
, etc. However, this would only work if the module was used for all the confederation qualifying competitions.
Jts1882 |
talk
10:45, 4 October 2019 (UTC)@ Jts1882: Thanks for fixing those small issues :) Sorry for not clarifying enough, we also need bold feature for this page. It seems like the current AFC module can take care of multiple group stages, we just count them as rounds and do not treat their groups separately. I think its structure is similar to the Euro 2020 qualifying module, and can be copied to all confederations; unfortunately I know almost nothing about programming templates and modules :( About merging data, please be noticed that if we plan to use modules for all confederal qualifications and the interconfederal playoffs, the playoffs module's data may overlap AFC-CONCACAF-CONMEBOL-OFC ones. Centaur271188 ( talk) 15:10, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
The updated and matches parameters do not work when we use templates, instead of invoking modules directly (see this article and CAF pages). Have they been merged so much that some changes in the module's code can affect the template? Centaur271188 ( talk) 08:52, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
|updated=
wasn't working (I used 'update') when parameters were supplied. It should be now. The matches parameter is used to calculate the average. Is the absence of "in x match(es)" what you are referring to?
Jts1882 |
talk
09:30, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
|bottom=
, |bottom_text=
and one with a single use (|intro=
). If there is a need for some sort of footer information I can add something. Feel free to add any suggestions for improvement. It's much easier to make the changes in lua than in the template language (especially when repeated 30 times).
Jts1882 |
talk
12:46, 7 October 2019 (UTC)BBC website saying Russia is banned from the world cup - where is best to update that? 141.92.67.43 ( talk) 10:52, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
A grid cartogram (where each country gets equal size) might be an improvement over a more accurately geographical rendering of countries. A typical map rendering obviously assigns vastly more space to some countries than others for reasons that don't help in communicating anything about those countries. It's particularly noticeable this year, in which the only federation that's qualified so far (the host Qatar) is barely a pixel on a typical map. But maps have some benefits over lists as they're easier to digest quickly.
I've taken a shot at creating a grid cartogram of FIFA federations, which is roughly similar to other attempts to tile map the world here, but with the expected differences for FIFA (the home nations, Puerto Rico, no Monaco, etc) and using FIFA's 3-letter country codes. Here's the result, with the same coloration for qualification status that we have on the world map.
Leaving here for feedback. If there are no concerns I'll clean it up and swap it in for the existing qualification map at some point. Simianvector ( talk) 20:23, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
I wrote it on the file's talk page, however as the discussion there may be inactive I write it here. What if teams who officially qualified with games still to play are shown in a colour another than those who qualified and won't play new matches (similarly to teams eliminated with games to play)? For example, it may be dark green. I would even consider a separate colour scheme for Qatar as they're hosts and don't participate in qualifiers (purple, for example). Of course, when qualification tournament concludes, these colours will no longer be in use.-- Joél be back ( talk) 05:59, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
@ 009988aaabbbccc, GazThomas402, Joél be back, and Walter Görlitz: What if we adopt the way we used for Euro 2020 qualifying? [3] Only "qualified", "can qualify" and "eliminated". I agree with Walter that "qualified with games to play" seems not very notable. So "eliminated with games to play" seems not very notable either. Also ping some editors who often update this kind of file in Commons. Centaur271188 ( talk) 13:34, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
I agree with removing the "games to play" section. For me it was always nonsensical. 009988aaabbbccc ( talk) 13:44, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
North Korea matches doesn´t count any more. FIFA declared them, nule. Please, don´t count goals and matches for totals. Fix it.-- 181.229.135.137 ( talk) 21:42, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Canada should be 2nd and USA should be 3rd. Canada is ahead of USA due to away goals in direct competition. These tie breaks are clearly explained in this article. 198.254.166.94 ( talk) 04:54, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
I suggest having overrall rankings like the Euro qualifiers on the UEFA page Cw131007 ( talk) 19:51, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I need to add some more information into the UEFA section. Minh Dang 1801 ( talk) 08:14, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
So in the map Slovenia is marked as color blue, indicating that they still have chance to qualify. They have currently 10 points and can get to max 16 points, while Croatia sitting in 2nd place has 17 points, making it impossible for Slovenia to qualify. Please change it's color to yellow, as I'm unable to do it myself. Pioter1936 ( talk) 07:24, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Nevermind then, thank you for correcting me. Indeed I don't really get how these Nation League group winners mechanics work, I'll now try and understand what they're about Pioter1936 ( talk) 07:32, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
A recent source has confirmed that OFC will begin qualification play in March 2022 and end in June 2022. Source is : https://www.republicworld.com/sports-news/football-news/fifa-world-cup-2022-how-many-teams-from-each-continent-can-make-it-to-qatar.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:283:4501:A340:DD96:96AD:E034:D172 ( talk) 06:16, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Serbia has only 2 consecutive appearances, they didn't feature at the 2014 world cup 178.148.184.222 ( talk) 15:41, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Russia is banned , but if they suddenly make it to the final (very unlikely, but suddenly) , then they can use their anthem or flag, is it after December 16? -- 212.164.204.182 ( talk) 04:03, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Czech Republic and Austria are eliminated from World Cup and Ecuador & Colombia have qualified to the World Cup. Please update the map if it surely happened. HONDA Gang (Talk) 15:24, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk page of the AFC fourth round article. Matilda Maniac ( talk) 01:02, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 ( talk) 12:20, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
– For consistency because this format already used in qualification articles (example 2022 FIFA World Cup qualification – CONCACAF Second Round & 2022 FIFA World Cup qualification – UEFA Group A) and also in all Olympics articles (example Athletics at the 2020 Summer Paralympics – Men's 100 metres. Hddty ( talk) 09:33, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
The map implies French Guiana is not a FIFA member. That's not all that accurate. The French Guianese CONCACAF team isn't part of FIFA, but its players can also play for the French team, which obviously is a FIFA member. 50.65.18.163 ( talk) 22:55, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
FIFA released that the OFC Draw will take place 29 November 2100 CET and have given more clarity on the qualifiers, i.e. American Samoa and Samoa have withdrawn from the qualifying, which will bring down the number of Nations Started to 9, and it also shared the format of the qualifying. Suvannixb ( talk) 09:14, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Canada had 100% qualified 207.6.108.116 ( talk) 21:18, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Russia has officially been disqualified, the page can be adjourned. Source https://www.newsweek.com/fifa-set-suspend-russia-football-2022-world-cup-report-1683272 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.23.225.204 ( talk) 17:50, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
@ 009988aaabbbccc, Chajusong, GazThomas402, and IAmBrazilian: Currently we have black (rgb 0-0-0, world PNG file [5]), red (rgb 255-0-0, world SVG file [6]) and a paler red (rgb 255-64-64, UEFA file [7]). I do not know about Wikipedia or Commons colour guidelines, but I think the 2 reds are somewhat annoying for readers, and we have only used red as a temporary colour ("eliminated with games to play", until we decided to simplify the map and abandon that section). Black has been the suspended/withdrawn colour since the beginning, so I would like to use it instead of red. Please comment, thanks :) Centaur271188 ( talk) 19:44, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Although Italy wins the Euro 2020 back and it was Eliminated in 2022 FIFA World Cup for 3rd Time Italy failed World cub it was lost by North Macedonia by 0-1 a former Yugoslav republic that has never qualified, and until this year never even came close this is the same happened in World cup 2018 in Russia that Italy is also eliminated since they eliminated first time in 1958.
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the figure Canada is in light blue indicanteing that it is not qualified yet, but in the same document in CONCACAF section it is qualified. it hould be in blue in the figure. 152.77.221.185 ( talk) 12:29, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Croatia was 3rd at 1998 world cup 179.56.48.190 ( talk) 13:17, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
@
Jkudlick: Hi, I open a talk here as you advised. Please be noticed that applying some teamwidth value is common for large tables (8 teams or more, I think). You can check out CONMEBOL tables from 2002, editors there use 110 or auto (1 and auto do the same job, the module will then choose the smallest possible value). 1998 and 2006 tables have default teamwidth value because they omit match results part and/or 'Qualification' column. The point here is trying to have enough space for 'Qualification' texts, so the tables look neater. If we have to break those texts, they should be broken least annoyingly ('2022 FIFA World Cup' or 'inter-confederation play-off' should be in one line), usually by using a nowrap. Normally we do not need it, the default teamwidth seems enough for 7-team-or-less tables and not too long team names - Bosnia and Herzegovina can fit, but Trinidad and Tobago will cause some trouble, so CONCACAF Hexagon tables of 2002 and 2018 also have teamwidths.
P/S: Never mind the strikethrough part :3 After some experiments, I realised most (or all) team names will fit in a normal table, even Turks and Caicos Islands (I do not know any longer one).
Centaur271188 (
talk)
19:59, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
This is text. | This cell does not have a linebreak. |
This is also text. | This cell has a forced linebreak. |
Here is more text. | Another cell with no linebreak. |
@ UltraBlazer: I do not know how that phrase became a Wikipedia's norm (it also looks like a Wikipedia's invention, a strict Google search from my PC provided results largely from our pages or pages quoting us directly [8], I assume that mostly nobody else refers to CONMEBOL qualifiers like that), I just think it is neither necessary nor proper. Round-robin is a format, not a specific stage, round or group; including it in the table is an inconsistency to me. Centaur271188 ( talk) 17:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
A sentence in the lead says that there was "no preliminary draw," and that individual confederations held their own draws, in contrast to other WC qualifiers. I cannot find support for this statement in the citation ( https://www.espn.com/soccer/fifa-world-cup/story/3860182/2022-world-cup-how-qualifying-works-around-the-world) or anywhere on line. On the contrary: (1) Preliminary draws for WC qualifiers seem to be only for the purpose of deciding inter-confederation matchups, and there was indeed such a preliminary draw for the 2022 WC qualifiers, as our article 2022 FIFA World Cup qualification (inter-confederation play-offs) notes: "The draw for the inter-confederation play-offs was held on 26 November 2021, 17:00 CET, in Zürich, Switzerland." (2) In other WC qualification years, the individual confederations always have had their own draws to determine how they place teams in their qualifying tournaments. At a minimum, this sentence needs to be rewritten and it needs a new citation. The citation says nothing about whether there was a preliminary draw for WC 2022 qualifying and it says nothing about how any of the facts purported in this sentence were different from previous World Cup qualifying tournaments. It would probably be best to delete the entire sentence unless someone can explain, with citation, what exactly the intended meaning was. Holy ( talk) 20:12, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Talk:2022 FIFA World Cup#Map regarding the terms "suspended" vs. "disqualified" in regards to Russia, and the exact terminology to be used in the map. I am of the opinion that both maps should be the same, which may be most easily solved by transcluding the map from one into the other, much like transcluding a template or section of prose. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 13:47, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change the time range of the 2022 FIFA World Cup Qualification from Thursday, June 6 2019 - Thursday, September 22, 2022 to Thursday, June 6 2019 - Tuesday, June 14 2022 Dieplsdieplsdie ( talk) 20:16, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
@ Island92, PeeJay, and S.A. Julio: Hi, I and PeeJay have an issue about how to sort it. For teams qualified on the same day, he would like to use 'Qualification method' column (winners -> runners-up -> etc.; or A -> B -> etc.), while I prefer the old chronological order. @PeeJay: you may think the hours or minutes difference between those teams is not very relevant or important, but some sources are still aware of that detail, so our sorting could be too. E.g. [9] (title - "Spain, Serbia 8th and 9th qualified teams for 2022 World Cup"), [10] (title and content mention USA before Mexico). Centaur271188 ( talk) 02:36, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
|addkey=
parameter. This would allow for teams which qualified on the same date to be sorted by time without altering the look of the table. —
Jkudlick ⚓
(talk)
19:06, 1 July 2022 (UTC)Qualifying will end on September 22, not September 21. fix it. 212.164.205.154 ( talk) 13:36, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Norway didn't withdraw from the tournament, they actually voted against the suggestion 2A00:23C6:C70C:5201:C199:7EF7:E4F7:B22 ( talk) 11:04, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Moroccan-Sahara4ever ( talk) 19:10, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Correct Morocco map including southern part of Morocco