This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
How on Earth does Małgorzata Kidawa-Błońska not have a page in Wikipedia? The monarchists get a page but the mainstream candidate not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.135.15.159 ( talk) 20:02, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
https://www.faz.net/aktuell/gesellschaft/gesundheit/coronavirus/pis-haelt-trotz-corona-noch-am-wahltermin-in-polen-fest-16702380.html -- Neun-x ( talk) 22:52, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
The big "elephant in the room" that is missing from this article is the COVID-19 pandemic question. There is a lot of material - from all POVs - that should be in this article - and it's not going to disappear until/if the election is officially postponed or it happens (in which case the effects on the pandemic would tend to go more in the pandemic article than this one, or possibly a new separate article, if the effects are massive enough, causing the next big wave of infections and deaths). I don't promise to add any of that, but I would like at least to make it easier for other people to add material, and I might put a few sentences to open up the topic. The problem is that the huge photos and blank space for the five "main" candidates take a big amount of vertical space (for a desktop browser). I don't know enough about wikitables to know if it's easy to stop them from taking so much blank space; html hacks with div's might be possible, but not necessarily recommendable in terms of accessibility.
Proposal: reformat the first-five-candidates sections so that their photos are something like a gallery format, and don't take up too much space. I don't see any problem in putting them in the equivalent format to the "Other candidates" - without party support. Photos are nice but they shouldn't push prose out of the way too much: they don't provide any information except candidates' physical appearance - which has nothing to do with what policies they have promised or what their political track records are. This is not an article about a "Miss" competition...
Any objections? Boud ( talk) 00:17, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Hey!,
about 30 min. ago we learn that there wouldn't be presidential election on 10 May, Agreement party got along with PiS, the supreme court will (its controlled by ruling party so it's obvious) declared invalid election - and after May 10 they will present a new date...
1,
2,
3, but there is still one problem - the constitution says that "Changing elections rules in a shorter period of time than 6 months before voting, as well as voting only by post is considered unconstitutional", so when we will officialy have new date - then we need to change this dates to a new one
Natanieluz (
talk) 21:31, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
According to the agreement, election on May 10th will be held, but not organized. Chairman of the Sejm will announce after that new election, with possibly new candidates. Election silence on May 9th and 10th will be held as well. There should two distinct articles about may 2020 election and tbd 2020 election. - MikołajZ ( talk) 11:36, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
@
Ed88: Hey!,
I saw that you added polls from wPolityce.pl, first of all, this site is not a reliable source of information, articles there are clearly supporting the government camp
and secondly this article were published 8 May 2020, that debate was only two days earlier (even to be clear 1 day earlier bc that debate took place late in the evening on 6 May).
In my opinion, we should wait at least a week for a reliable survey, also we have a "political crisis" right now... --
Natanieluz (
talk) 11:07, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Two distinct tables for the first round polls looks like a mess IMHO. Editor Natanieluz made it look this way after resignation of Kidawa-Błońska, without asking for this in the talk (however requires me to do so, so I do). My proposed version of this section is below. It shows political events and makes article look way better structured. Basically it is based on a universal pattern of articles like Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election. - MikołajZ ( talk) 16:05, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Poll source | Date(s) administered | Don't know/ Abstain |
Others | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duda IN |
Trzaskowski PO |
Biedroń LEFT |
Kosiniak-Kamysz PSL |
Bosak KWiN |
Hołownia IN | ||||
Kidawa-Błońska (formerly) PO | |||||||||
Social Changes | 11–18 May 2020 | - | 2% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 7% | 6% | 18% |
Pollster | 15–17 May 2020 | - | 2.13% | 43.76% | 16.54% | 5.51% | 9.73% | 6.45% | 15.88% |
IBRiS | 16 May 2020 | 7.7% | - | 43.2% | 16.0% | 6.8% | 9.6% | 6.8% | 9.9% |
United Survey | 15 May 2020 | 7.1% | - | 43.7% | 14.0% | 5.2% | 9.8% | 6.9% | 13.3% |
Kantar Public | 15 May 2020 | 6% | 1% | 51% | 11% | 3% | 6% | 5% | 17% |
Estymator | 14–15 May 2020 | - | 1.3% | 52.7% | 10.2% | 5.7% | 11.8% | 7.8% | 10.5% |
Rafał Trzaskowski is declared as a new candidate of the Civic Coalition | |||||||||
Social Changes | 12–14 May 2020 | - | 1% | 49% | 5% | 4% | 12% | 7% | 22% |
IBRiS | 8–9 May 2020 | 3.1% | 0.0% | 45.0% | 4.5% | 2.6% | 16.6% | 9.0% | 19.2% |
Postal election are announced to be cancelled in May | |||||||||
Social Changes | 6–7 May 2020 | - | 4% | 54% | 5% | 5% | 9% | 8% | 15% |
6–7 May 2020 | - | 4% | 64% | 2% | 3% | 7% | 7% | 13% | |
Pollster | 30 April-4 May 2020 | - | - | 40.57% | 10.49% | 9.56% | 14.39% | 4.65% | 20.34% |
IPSOS | 27–29 April 2020 | 11% | - | 42% | 7% | 6% | 12% | 6% | 15% |
IPSOS | 27–29 April 2020 | 5% | - | 63% | 2% | 5% | 7% | 7% | 11% |
IBRiS | 27 April 2020 | 8.9% | - | 49.7% | 6.7% | 6.4% | 14.1% | 5.0% | 9.2% |
Social Changes | 24–27 April 2020 | - | 1% | 54% | 7% | 6% | 10% | 8% | 14% |
Social Changes | 24–27 April 2020 | - | 1% | 64% | 3% | 3% | 8% | 7% | 14% |
CBOS | 23–27 April 2020 | 10% | 1% | 52% | 5% | 5% | 6% | 7% | 14% |
Estymator | 23–24 April 2020 | - | 0.4% | 51.7% | 8.4% | 7.7% | 16.6% | 6.4% | 8.8% |
Social Changes | 17–20 April 2020 | - | 1% | 57% | 11% | 5% | 11% | 6% | 9% |
Social Changes | 17–20 April 2020 | - | 2% | 65% | 5% | 5% | 6% | 7% | 10% |
Kantar | 16–17 April 2020 | 11% | 3% | 59% | 4% | 5% | 7% | 5% | 7% |
Social Changes | 10–13 April 2020 | - | 1% | 59% | 9% | 5% | 10% | 8% | 8% |
Estymator | 8–9 April 2020 | - | 0.3% | 53.1% | 13.4% | 9.4% | 15.6% | 3.3% | 4.9% |
IBRiS | 7 April 2020 | 7.1% | - | 52.9% | 11.4% | 7.3% | 12.6% | 3.2% | 5.5% |
Pollster | 6–7 April 2020 | - | - | 44.53% | 14.23% | 6.70% | 15.25% | 6.21% | 13.08% |
Maison & Partners | 3–7 April 2020 | 27.9% | - | 29.5% | 10.5% | 7.1% | 10.6% | 3.4% | 11.2% |
Social Changes | 3–6 April 2020 | - | 2% | 53% | 11% | 5% | 13% | 7% | 9% |
IBRiS | 3–4 April 2020 | 9.9% | - | 47.6% | 12.4% | 6.7% | 12.0% | 5.4% | 6.0% |
IBSP | 31 March-2 April 2020 | - | 0.29% | 44.29% | 15.77% | 6.24% | 15.87% | 5.24% | 12.30% |
Małgorzata Kidawa-Błońska called to boycott May postal election | |||||||||
Social Changes | 27–30 March 2020 | - | 1% | 55% | 14% | 6% | 10% | 5% | 9% |
IBRiS | 27–28 March 2020 | 5.6% | - | 45.1% | 17.2% | 8.5% | 12.1% | 7.5% | 3.9% |
27–28 March 2020 | 5.3% | - | 54.6% | 12.1% | 8.7% | 6.4% | 9.2% | 3.7% | |
Estymator | 25–26 March 2020 | - | 0.9% | 49.8% | 17.1% | 10.8% | 15.4% | 3.1% | 2.9% |
Kantar | 23–24 March 2020 | 6% | - | 65% | 10% | 5% | 4% | 6% | 4% |
23–24 March 2020 | 10% | - | 44% | 19% | 7% | 8% | 5% | 7% | |
Social Changes | 20–23 March 2020 | - | - | 47% | 19% | 10% | 11% | 6% | 7% |
United Survey | 20 March 2020 | 16.7% | - | 42.7% | 16.6% | 5.7% | 8.7% | 6.6% | 2.9% |
Pollster | 17–18 March 2020 | - | - | 43.19% | 21.13% | 9.54% | 12.96% | 4.44% | 8.74% |
Social Changes | 13–17 March 2020 | - | - | 41% | 23% | 9% | 13% | 4% | 10% |
CBOS | 5–15 March 2020 | 10% | - | 50% | 15% | 5% | 9% | 3% | 6% |
Estymator | 12–13 March 2020 | - | 0.2% | 46.4% | 20.4% | 11.4% | 10.1% | 4.6% | 6.9% |
IBSP | 10–13 March 2020 | - | 0.15% | 51.36% | 19.79% | 7.59% | 8.98% | 5.51% | 6.62% |
Kantar | 6–11 March 2020 | 13% | - | 43% | 22% | 6% | 9% | 3% | 4% |
Social Changes | 6–10 March 2020 | - | - | 45% | 22% | 8% | 9% | 5% | 11% |
First case of COVID-19 confirmed in Poland | |||||||||
IBRiS | 2 March 2020 | 5.9% | - | 41.2% | 23.1% | 6.1% | 11.4% | 4.8% | 7.6% |
Social Changes | 28 February-2 March 2020 | - | - | 42% | 24% | 11% | 9% | 5% | 9% |
Estymator | 27–28 February 2020 | - | 0.1% | 44.8% | 24.4% | 9.7% | 10.4% | 4.9% | 5.7% |
Indicator | 26–28 February 2020 | 4.3% | 1.2% | 42.9% | 23.3% | 9.3% | 8.1% | 3.7% | 7.2% |
Pollster | 24–26 February 2020 | - | - | 42.44% | 22.14% | 9.45% | 11.71% | 4.92% | 9.34% |
Social Changes | 21–24 February 2020 | - | - | 43% | 24% | 10% | 7% | 5% | 11% |
United Survey | 22 February 2020 | 5.8% | - | 41.9% | 22.2% | 8.2% | 10.4% | 4.1% | 7.4% |
IPSOS | 20–22 February 2020 | 6% | - | 41% | 25% | 9% | 7% | 5% | 7% |
IBSP | 18–20 February 2020 | - | 0.58% | 45.16% | 26.42% | 8.78% | 6.56% | 4.44% | 8.06% |
Social Changes | 14–18 February 2020 | - | - | 40% | 25% | 9% | 9% | 5% | 12% |
CBOS | 6–16 February 2020 | 12% | 3% | 50% | 20% | 4% | 5% | 1% | 5% |
Dobra Opinia | 10–14 February 2020 | - | - | 41.34% | 24.02% | 11.21% | 8.11% | 5.31% | 10.01% |
Estymator | 12–13 February 2020 | - | 0.2% | 45.3% | 26.4% | 7.4% | 10.1% | 4.7% | 5.9% |
Kantar | 7–12 February 2020 | 17% | 1% | 40% | 21% | 7% | 5% | 3% | 6% |
Social Changes | 7–11 February 2020 | - | - | 46% | 24% | 9% | 7% | 5% | 9% |
IBRiS | 7–8 February 2020 | 4.3% | - | 43.7% | 29.2% | 6.9% | 4.0% | 3.8% | 8.1% |
IBRiS | - | 8.2% | - | 41.7% | 26.3% | 7.7% | 5.2% | 4.6% | 6.3% |
Election are officially announced to be held on May 10th. The campaign starts | |||||||||
Social Changes | 1–4 February 2020 | - | 2% | 42% | 25% | 10% | 6% | 3% | 12% |
Kantar | 29-30 January 2020 | 7% | 1% | 44% | 24% | 8% | 4% | 3% | 9% |
Maison & Partners | 24–28 January 2020 | 10.0% | - | 38.3% | 22.3% | 9.0% | 6.3% | 3.2% | 10.9% |
Social Changes | 24–27 January 2020 | - | 2% | 43% | 24% | 10% | 7% | 4% | 10% |
Estymator | 23–24 January 2020 | - | 0.4% | 47.1% | 24.1% | 8.9% | 9.3% | 4.6% | 5.6% |
Krzysztof Bosak is declared as a candidate of the Confederation | |||||||||
Social Changes | 17–21 January 2020 | - | - | 44% | 24% | 8% | 9% | 4% | 11% |
Kantar | 9-15 January 2020 | 22% | 2% | 38% | 20% | 7% | 4% | 1% | 6% |
IBSP | 14–16 January 2020 | - | - | 43.73% | 26.61% | 7.26% | 7.77% | 5.07% | 9.56% |
Pollster | 14–16 January 2020 | - | - | 44.96% | 23.11% | 9.09% | 7.86% | 5.12% | 9.86% |
Social Changes | 10–14 January 2020 | - | - | 45% | 22% | 9% | 8% | 3% | 13% |
United Survey | 10–11 January 2020 | 7.4% | - | 43.0% | 23.3% | 7.3% | 7.0% | 5.3% | 6.7% |
IBRiS | 10-11 January 2020 | 8.2% | - | 44% | 23.3% | 6.6% | 7.0% | 5.1% | 5.7% |
Estymator | 9–10 January | - | 47.7% | 22.7% | 8.8% | 9% | 4.3% | 6.9% | |
Robert Biedroń is declared as a candidate of the Left | |||||||||
Social Changes | 3–7 January 2020 | - | 6% | 42% | 26% | - | 9% | 4% | 13% |
Social Changes | 27–31 December 2019 | - | 5% | 43% | 26% | - | 6% | 4% | 16% |
Social Changes | 20–24 December 2019 | - | 7% | 43% | 24% | - | 9% | 4% | 13% |
Estymator | 19–20 December 2019 | - | 8.3% | 46.6% | 22.4% | - | 9.2% | 4.6% | 7.9% |
IBSP | 17–20 December 2019 | - | 7.4% | 43.9% | 26.3% | - | 7.3% | 5.4% | 9.7% |
Social Changes | 13–17 December 2019 | - | 7% | 46% | 23% | - | 7% | 4% | 13% |
Social Changes | 28 November-3 December 2019 | 14% | 11% | 37% | 22% | - | 8% | - | 8% |
Maison and Partners poll is an internal one of Hołownia's campaign staff, ordered by them according to theirs requirements. It was released to the media, but not publicated as other in principle. I think we shouldn't include internal polls. - MikołajZ ( talk) 13:28, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
small
to Kidawa, is this ok? --
Natanieluz (
talk) 12:34, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
@
Natanieluz: can you please explain what is "NET"?
Braganza (
talk) 18:06, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Thank you Braganza ( talk) 18:08, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Marshal of the Polish Sejm just announced the new presidential elections (28 June 2020) [1]. I suggest moving this article to another name, either 2020 Polish presidential election (I) or 2020 Polish presidential election (May). Please let me know what do you think. Cheers! Nadzik ( talk) 10:06, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
In a legal sense, June and May election are distinct one. May election legally took place. It is incorrect to keep both of them as one article. Why there isn't Kidawa-Błońska in the infobox? She was an official candidate in previous election. It is obvious there should be two distinct articles - otherwise it will remain misleading and confusing. - MikołajZ ( talk) 21:44, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 01:52, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Because there is already a separate opinion polling article for this election, should the Second Round polling data for candidates that do not reach the Second Round be removed from this page once the results of the first round are known? This would reduce the length of this article to a more manageable size because there will need to be a Results section added soon for the First Round. boldblazer ( talk) 05:51, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
In the Results section, should there be a column for the Alliances/Coalitions that each candidate is representing in this election? It seems that some users edited the names of the alliances/coalition mistakenly in the Parties column. If we come to a consensus to add that column, where should this column go in the Results table? Also, should we add the colours next to each candidates name? boldblazer ( talk) 00:14, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
I removed the duplicate listing of Duda and Trzaskowski in a "Second Round Candidates" section, but this has been reverted because it is "standard" on this series of articles.
http://ewybory.eu/wybory-prezydenckie-2020/
That`s basically the victory for him. No way his opponent will turn these numbers arround.
62.226.88.220 ( talk) 03:08, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
The policy section as of this edit has WP:UNDUE weight put on as it is the only policy of any candidate noted in the section. Additionally it should not be part of the COVID/election day change section. Removing for now. Mkwia ( talk) 10:41, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
The reaction section has some POV issues. I think that the polarised Polish media is not a reliable source to add observer's view in this election. The sources used to denounce Civic Platform lean PiS party . So we should take into account that it violates neutrality commitments of Wikipedia articles. Ppt2003 ( talk) 16:12, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
The lead is not the place for the OSCE report, as the report isn't due to be put in the lead and because the section "Elections Challenged" gives the necessary context. The sentence in the lead is completely out of the blue (What public broadcaster?) (Why?). I fail to see why "this is a routine report by the OSCE https://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/poland/454699 a highly significant, independent agency. The OSCE does not challenge elections, it observes them" has anything to do with me taking it out of the lead. T Magierowski ( talk) 19:00, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
How on Earth does Małgorzata Kidawa-Błońska not have a page in Wikipedia? The monarchists get a page but the mainstream candidate not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.135.15.159 ( talk) 20:02, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
https://www.faz.net/aktuell/gesellschaft/gesundheit/coronavirus/pis-haelt-trotz-corona-noch-am-wahltermin-in-polen-fest-16702380.html -- Neun-x ( talk) 22:52, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
The big "elephant in the room" that is missing from this article is the COVID-19 pandemic question. There is a lot of material - from all POVs - that should be in this article - and it's not going to disappear until/if the election is officially postponed or it happens (in which case the effects on the pandemic would tend to go more in the pandemic article than this one, or possibly a new separate article, if the effects are massive enough, causing the next big wave of infections and deaths). I don't promise to add any of that, but I would like at least to make it easier for other people to add material, and I might put a few sentences to open up the topic. The problem is that the huge photos and blank space for the five "main" candidates take a big amount of vertical space (for a desktop browser). I don't know enough about wikitables to know if it's easy to stop them from taking so much blank space; html hacks with div's might be possible, but not necessarily recommendable in terms of accessibility.
Proposal: reformat the first-five-candidates sections so that their photos are something like a gallery format, and don't take up too much space. I don't see any problem in putting them in the equivalent format to the "Other candidates" - without party support. Photos are nice but they shouldn't push prose out of the way too much: they don't provide any information except candidates' physical appearance - which has nothing to do with what policies they have promised or what their political track records are. This is not an article about a "Miss" competition...
Any objections? Boud ( talk) 00:17, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Hey!,
about 30 min. ago we learn that there wouldn't be presidential election on 10 May, Agreement party got along with PiS, the supreme court will (its controlled by ruling party so it's obvious) declared invalid election - and after May 10 they will present a new date...
1,
2,
3, but there is still one problem - the constitution says that "Changing elections rules in a shorter period of time than 6 months before voting, as well as voting only by post is considered unconstitutional", so when we will officialy have new date - then we need to change this dates to a new one
Natanieluz (
talk) 21:31, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
According to the agreement, election on May 10th will be held, but not organized. Chairman of the Sejm will announce after that new election, with possibly new candidates. Election silence on May 9th and 10th will be held as well. There should two distinct articles about may 2020 election and tbd 2020 election. - MikołajZ ( talk) 11:36, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
@
Ed88: Hey!,
I saw that you added polls from wPolityce.pl, first of all, this site is not a reliable source of information, articles there are clearly supporting the government camp
and secondly this article were published 8 May 2020, that debate was only two days earlier (even to be clear 1 day earlier bc that debate took place late in the evening on 6 May).
In my opinion, we should wait at least a week for a reliable survey, also we have a "political crisis" right now... --
Natanieluz (
talk) 11:07, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Two distinct tables for the first round polls looks like a mess IMHO. Editor Natanieluz made it look this way after resignation of Kidawa-Błońska, without asking for this in the talk (however requires me to do so, so I do). My proposed version of this section is below. It shows political events and makes article look way better structured. Basically it is based on a universal pattern of articles like Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election. - MikołajZ ( talk) 16:05, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Poll source | Date(s) administered | Don't know/ Abstain |
Others | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duda IN |
Trzaskowski PO |
Biedroń LEFT |
Kosiniak-Kamysz PSL |
Bosak KWiN |
Hołownia IN | ||||
Kidawa-Błońska (formerly) PO | |||||||||
Social Changes | 11–18 May 2020 | - | 2% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 7% | 6% | 18% |
Pollster | 15–17 May 2020 | - | 2.13% | 43.76% | 16.54% | 5.51% | 9.73% | 6.45% | 15.88% |
IBRiS | 16 May 2020 | 7.7% | - | 43.2% | 16.0% | 6.8% | 9.6% | 6.8% | 9.9% |
United Survey | 15 May 2020 | 7.1% | - | 43.7% | 14.0% | 5.2% | 9.8% | 6.9% | 13.3% |
Kantar Public | 15 May 2020 | 6% | 1% | 51% | 11% | 3% | 6% | 5% | 17% |
Estymator | 14–15 May 2020 | - | 1.3% | 52.7% | 10.2% | 5.7% | 11.8% | 7.8% | 10.5% |
Rafał Trzaskowski is declared as a new candidate of the Civic Coalition | |||||||||
Social Changes | 12–14 May 2020 | - | 1% | 49% | 5% | 4% | 12% | 7% | 22% |
IBRiS | 8–9 May 2020 | 3.1% | 0.0% | 45.0% | 4.5% | 2.6% | 16.6% | 9.0% | 19.2% |
Postal election are announced to be cancelled in May | |||||||||
Social Changes | 6–7 May 2020 | - | 4% | 54% | 5% | 5% | 9% | 8% | 15% |
6–7 May 2020 | - | 4% | 64% | 2% | 3% | 7% | 7% | 13% | |
Pollster | 30 April-4 May 2020 | - | - | 40.57% | 10.49% | 9.56% | 14.39% | 4.65% | 20.34% |
IPSOS | 27–29 April 2020 | 11% | - | 42% | 7% | 6% | 12% | 6% | 15% |
IPSOS | 27–29 April 2020 | 5% | - | 63% | 2% | 5% | 7% | 7% | 11% |
IBRiS | 27 April 2020 | 8.9% | - | 49.7% | 6.7% | 6.4% | 14.1% | 5.0% | 9.2% |
Social Changes | 24–27 April 2020 | - | 1% | 54% | 7% | 6% | 10% | 8% | 14% |
Social Changes | 24–27 April 2020 | - | 1% | 64% | 3% | 3% | 8% | 7% | 14% |
CBOS | 23–27 April 2020 | 10% | 1% | 52% | 5% | 5% | 6% | 7% | 14% |
Estymator | 23–24 April 2020 | - | 0.4% | 51.7% | 8.4% | 7.7% | 16.6% | 6.4% | 8.8% |
Social Changes | 17–20 April 2020 | - | 1% | 57% | 11% | 5% | 11% | 6% | 9% |
Social Changes | 17–20 April 2020 | - | 2% | 65% | 5% | 5% | 6% | 7% | 10% |
Kantar | 16–17 April 2020 | 11% | 3% | 59% | 4% | 5% | 7% | 5% | 7% |
Social Changes | 10–13 April 2020 | - | 1% | 59% | 9% | 5% | 10% | 8% | 8% |
Estymator | 8–9 April 2020 | - | 0.3% | 53.1% | 13.4% | 9.4% | 15.6% | 3.3% | 4.9% |
IBRiS | 7 April 2020 | 7.1% | - | 52.9% | 11.4% | 7.3% | 12.6% | 3.2% | 5.5% |
Pollster | 6–7 April 2020 | - | - | 44.53% | 14.23% | 6.70% | 15.25% | 6.21% | 13.08% |
Maison & Partners | 3–7 April 2020 | 27.9% | - | 29.5% | 10.5% | 7.1% | 10.6% | 3.4% | 11.2% |
Social Changes | 3–6 April 2020 | - | 2% | 53% | 11% | 5% | 13% | 7% | 9% |
IBRiS | 3–4 April 2020 | 9.9% | - | 47.6% | 12.4% | 6.7% | 12.0% | 5.4% | 6.0% |
IBSP | 31 March-2 April 2020 | - | 0.29% | 44.29% | 15.77% | 6.24% | 15.87% | 5.24% | 12.30% |
Małgorzata Kidawa-Błońska called to boycott May postal election | |||||||||
Social Changes | 27–30 March 2020 | - | 1% | 55% | 14% | 6% | 10% | 5% | 9% |
IBRiS | 27–28 March 2020 | 5.6% | - | 45.1% | 17.2% | 8.5% | 12.1% | 7.5% | 3.9% |
27–28 March 2020 | 5.3% | - | 54.6% | 12.1% | 8.7% | 6.4% | 9.2% | 3.7% | |
Estymator | 25–26 March 2020 | - | 0.9% | 49.8% | 17.1% | 10.8% | 15.4% | 3.1% | 2.9% |
Kantar | 23–24 March 2020 | 6% | - | 65% | 10% | 5% | 4% | 6% | 4% |
23–24 March 2020 | 10% | - | 44% | 19% | 7% | 8% | 5% | 7% | |
Social Changes | 20–23 March 2020 | - | - | 47% | 19% | 10% | 11% | 6% | 7% |
United Survey | 20 March 2020 | 16.7% | - | 42.7% | 16.6% | 5.7% | 8.7% | 6.6% | 2.9% |
Pollster | 17–18 March 2020 | - | - | 43.19% | 21.13% | 9.54% | 12.96% | 4.44% | 8.74% |
Social Changes | 13–17 March 2020 | - | - | 41% | 23% | 9% | 13% | 4% | 10% |
CBOS | 5–15 March 2020 | 10% | - | 50% | 15% | 5% | 9% | 3% | 6% |
Estymator | 12–13 March 2020 | - | 0.2% | 46.4% | 20.4% | 11.4% | 10.1% | 4.6% | 6.9% |
IBSP | 10–13 March 2020 | - | 0.15% | 51.36% | 19.79% | 7.59% | 8.98% | 5.51% | 6.62% |
Kantar | 6–11 March 2020 | 13% | - | 43% | 22% | 6% | 9% | 3% | 4% |
Social Changes | 6–10 March 2020 | - | - | 45% | 22% | 8% | 9% | 5% | 11% |
First case of COVID-19 confirmed in Poland | |||||||||
IBRiS | 2 March 2020 | 5.9% | - | 41.2% | 23.1% | 6.1% | 11.4% | 4.8% | 7.6% |
Social Changes | 28 February-2 March 2020 | - | - | 42% | 24% | 11% | 9% | 5% | 9% |
Estymator | 27–28 February 2020 | - | 0.1% | 44.8% | 24.4% | 9.7% | 10.4% | 4.9% | 5.7% |
Indicator | 26–28 February 2020 | 4.3% | 1.2% | 42.9% | 23.3% | 9.3% | 8.1% | 3.7% | 7.2% |
Pollster | 24–26 February 2020 | - | - | 42.44% | 22.14% | 9.45% | 11.71% | 4.92% | 9.34% |
Social Changes | 21–24 February 2020 | - | - | 43% | 24% | 10% | 7% | 5% | 11% |
United Survey | 22 February 2020 | 5.8% | - | 41.9% | 22.2% | 8.2% | 10.4% | 4.1% | 7.4% |
IPSOS | 20–22 February 2020 | 6% | - | 41% | 25% | 9% | 7% | 5% | 7% |
IBSP | 18–20 February 2020 | - | 0.58% | 45.16% | 26.42% | 8.78% | 6.56% | 4.44% | 8.06% |
Social Changes | 14–18 February 2020 | - | - | 40% | 25% | 9% | 9% | 5% | 12% |
CBOS | 6–16 February 2020 | 12% | 3% | 50% | 20% | 4% | 5% | 1% | 5% |
Dobra Opinia | 10–14 February 2020 | - | - | 41.34% | 24.02% | 11.21% | 8.11% | 5.31% | 10.01% |
Estymator | 12–13 February 2020 | - | 0.2% | 45.3% | 26.4% | 7.4% | 10.1% | 4.7% | 5.9% |
Kantar | 7–12 February 2020 | 17% | 1% | 40% | 21% | 7% | 5% | 3% | 6% |
Social Changes | 7–11 February 2020 | - | - | 46% | 24% | 9% | 7% | 5% | 9% |
IBRiS | 7–8 February 2020 | 4.3% | - | 43.7% | 29.2% | 6.9% | 4.0% | 3.8% | 8.1% |
IBRiS | - | 8.2% | - | 41.7% | 26.3% | 7.7% | 5.2% | 4.6% | 6.3% |
Election are officially announced to be held on May 10th. The campaign starts | |||||||||
Social Changes | 1–4 February 2020 | - | 2% | 42% | 25% | 10% | 6% | 3% | 12% |
Kantar | 29-30 January 2020 | 7% | 1% | 44% | 24% | 8% | 4% | 3% | 9% |
Maison & Partners | 24–28 January 2020 | 10.0% | - | 38.3% | 22.3% | 9.0% | 6.3% | 3.2% | 10.9% |
Social Changes | 24–27 January 2020 | - | 2% | 43% | 24% | 10% | 7% | 4% | 10% |
Estymator | 23–24 January 2020 | - | 0.4% | 47.1% | 24.1% | 8.9% | 9.3% | 4.6% | 5.6% |
Krzysztof Bosak is declared as a candidate of the Confederation | |||||||||
Social Changes | 17–21 January 2020 | - | - | 44% | 24% | 8% | 9% | 4% | 11% |
Kantar | 9-15 January 2020 | 22% | 2% | 38% | 20% | 7% | 4% | 1% | 6% |
IBSP | 14–16 January 2020 | - | - | 43.73% | 26.61% | 7.26% | 7.77% | 5.07% | 9.56% |
Pollster | 14–16 January 2020 | - | - | 44.96% | 23.11% | 9.09% | 7.86% | 5.12% | 9.86% |
Social Changes | 10–14 January 2020 | - | - | 45% | 22% | 9% | 8% | 3% | 13% |
United Survey | 10–11 January 2020 | 7.4% | - | 43.0% | 23.3% | 7.3% | 7.0% | 5.3% | 6.7% |
IBRiS | 10-11 January 2020 | 8.2% | - | 44% | 23.3% | 6.6% | 7.0% | 5.1% | 5.7% |
Estymator | 9–10 January | - | 47.7% | 22.7% | 8.8% | 9% | 4.3% | 6.9% | |
Robert Biedroń is declared as a candidate of the Left | |||||||||
Social Changes | 3–7 January 2020 | - | 6% | 42% | 26% | - | 9% | 4% | 13% |
Social Changes | 27–31 December 2019 | - | 5% | 43% | 26% | - | 6% | 4% | 16% |
Social Changes | 20–24 December 2019 | - | 7% | 43% | 24% | - | 9% | 4% | 13% |
Estymator | 19–20 December 2019 | - | 8.3% | 46.6% | 22.4% | - | 9.2% | 4.6% | 7.9% |
IBSP | 17–20 December 2019 | - | 7.4% | 43.9% | 26.3% | - | 7.3% | 5.4% | 9.7% |
Social Changes | 13–17 December 2019 | - | 7% | 46% | 23% | - | 7% | 4% | 13% |
Social Changes | 28 November-3 December 2019 | 14% | 11% | 37% | 22% | - | 8% | - | 8% |
Maison and Partners poll is an internal one of Hołownia's campaign staff, ordered by them according to theirs requirements. It was released to the media, but not publicated as other in principle. I think we shouldn't include internal polls. - MikołajZ ( talk) 13:28, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
small
to Kidawa, is this ok? --
Natanieluz (
talk) 12:34, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
@
Natanieluz: can you please explain what is "NET"?
Braganza (
talk) 18:06, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Thank you Braganza ( talk) 18:08, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Marshal of the Polish Sejm just announced the new presidential elections (28 June 2020) [1]. I suggest moving this article to another name, either 2020 Polish presidential election (I) or 2020 Polish presidential election (May). Please let me know what do you think. Cheers! Nadzik ( talk) 10:06, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
In a legal sense, June and May election are distinct one. May election legally took place. It is incorrect to keep both of them as one article. Why there isn't Kidawa-Błońska in the infobox? She was an official candidate in previous election. It is obvious there should be two distinct articles - otherwise it will remain misleading and confusing. - MikołajZ ( talk) 21:44, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 01:52, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Because there is already a separate opinion polling article for this election, should the Second Round polling data for candidates that do not reach the Second Round be removed from this page once the results of the first round are known? This would reduce the length of this article to a more manageable size because there will need to be a Results section added soon for the First Round. boldblazer ( talk) 05:51, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
In the Results section, should there be a column for the Alliances/Coalitions that each candidate is representing in this election? It seems that some users edited the names of the alliances/coalition mistakenly in the Parties column. If we come to a consensus to add that column, where should this column go in the Results table? Also, should we add the colours next to each candidates name? boldblazer ( talk) 00:14, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
I removed the duplicate listing of Duda and Trzaskowski in a "Second Round Candidates" section, but this has been reverted because it is "standard" on this series of articles.
http://ewybory.eu/wybory-prezydenckie-2020/
That`s basically the victory for him. No way his opponent will turn these numbers arround.
62.226.88.220 ( talk) 03:08, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
The policy section as of this edit has WP:UNDUE weight put on as it is the only policy of any candidate noted in the section. Additionally it should not be part of the COVID/election day change section. Removing for now. Mkwia ( talk) 10:41, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
The reaction section has some POV issues. I think that the polarised Polish media is not a reliable source to add observer's view in this election. The sources used to denounce Civic Platform lean PiS party . So we should take into account that it violates neutrality commitments of Wikipedia articles. Ppt2003 ( talk) 16:12, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
The lead is not the place for the OSCE report, as the report isn't due to be put in the lead and because the section "Elections Challenged" gives the necessary context. The sentence in the lead is completely out of the blue (What public broadcaster?) (Why?). I fail to see why "this is a routine report by the OSCE https://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/poland/454699 a highly significant, independent agency. The OSCE does not challenge elections, it observes them" has anything to do with me taking it out of the lead. T Magierowski ( talk) 19:00, 31 August 2020 (UTC)