![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
This section could and should be condensed down into a couple of sentences. As a tertiary source, we should summarise secondary sources, not quote them, especially when the material quoted is so very mundane. -- MarchOrDie ( talk) 22:22, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
2019 Pulwama attack has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Request : To make use of MARTYRED instead of KILLED for the CRPF Personnel. Pundareekaksh ( talk) 09:02, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
"Two" personnels were martyred from TAMILNADU... Not"one" Catherine Bertini ( talk) 16:19, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
2019 Pulwama attack has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the opening para - please add the following refs:
Refs -
These are National Dailies in India and should be referenced along with the BBC source.
Moreover @
Kautilya3: please remove the footnote you have added to the CRPF line in the first paragraph (footnote a) because it doesn't make any sense. The CRPF article is already linked and thus a footnote is not required to tell the reader what CRPF is.
47.30.212.255 (
talk)
13:02, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
2019 Pulwama attack has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Here is the complete list of the martyred CRPF jawans:
223.230.77.40 ( talk) 17:56, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Please consider changing the first sentence from "...was attacked by a vehicle-bound suicide bomber at Lethpora (near Awantipora) in the Pulwama district,..." to "...was attacked by a vehicle-borne suicide bomber at Lethpora (near Awantipora) in the Pulwama district,...". This is a grammatical edit and assumes that the intent of the text was to indicate the mode of attack, not that the attacker was destined to hit the bus or that the attacker was physically tied or shackled in the attacking vehicle. Emphasis for identification only.
Malchemist (
talk) 01:15, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Done Good point. --
MarchOrDie (
talk)
01:53, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
International reactions by Heads of the states, Ambassadors, High Commissioner, External Affairs Ministers etc to international/transnational issues are needed to be noted in detail. They should not be briefed up in one or two lines. - Vaikunda Raja :talk: 04:30, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
@ Gotitbro:, the section "Reactions" from the article 2019 Pulwama attack was removed and new article was created with the title Reactions to the 2019 Pulwama attack, please take a look. - Vaikunda Raja :talk: 10:17, 17 February 2019 (UTC
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
@ Vaikunda Raja: Again this has been done. Please wait for the AFD to reach aa consensus, then you can add/remove the Reactions section. Why are you adding/removing it again and again? @ Gotitbro: I am sorry for having misread your edit summary, please ignore that comment. 119.82.70.109 ( talk) 11:01, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Article fully protected for two days. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 11:35, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
2019 Pulwama attack has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change death count in infobox from 40 to 41, the format is generally 41 (40 CRPF personnel + 1 suicide bomber). -- QEDK ( 後 ☕ 桜) 15:09, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Suicide bombers are not human they are monsters they dont need to be calculated Indiamerijaan2001 ( talk) 12:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
2019 Pulwama attack has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add below to reactions. Rahul Gandhi is the president of INC , his reaction is important.
Rahul Gandhi said that he and his Congress party would support the government and would "not get into any other discussion for the next couple of days". [1]
2607:FEA8:6A0:44D:898D:64E9:2B6F:F5C6 ( talk) Indian 2607:FEA8:6A0:44D:898D:64E9:2B6F:F5C6 ( talk) 17:08, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
References
{{
edit protected}}
template. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
06:59, 18 February 2019 (UTC)![]() | This
edit request to
2019 Pulwama attack has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In aftermath section, request to change "Kashmiri students were attacked in Dehradun by Bajrang Dal and Viswa Hindu Parishad" to "Kashmiri students were allegedly attacked in Dehradun by Bajrang Dal and Viswa Hindu Parishad" or be removed completely. Both the sources supporting this used "allegedly" in their prose as well as headlines. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 04:27, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
2019 Pulwama attack has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
REMOVE: (It is widely accepted among security analysts that Jaish-e-Mohammed is the creation of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence, which continues to provide it backing.)
![]() | This
edit request to
2019 Pulwama attack has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
ADD to the beginning of Background section:
ADD to Reactions section:
Is your request uncontroversial?" requirement anyway since it doesn't seem to be either uncontroversial or have an existing consensus. Nil Einne ( talk) 14:32, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
References
![]() | This
edit request to
2019 Pulwama attack has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please update the article. 4 more CRPF men killed, death toll rises 49. [1] — Bukhari (Talk!) 06:26, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
References
References
Lot of information can be added in this section like:
Reliable references are covering all stories. Sumit Singh T 10:32, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
@ Nil Einne: and @ FR30799386: There are many neutral sources out there which talk about the background and the subject itself at the same time such as WashingtonPost and Dawn. My suggestion is we revert this edit and add these sources inline. After reading this source there seems no correlation either between the incidents mentioned in the start of the background section. MehrajMir (talk) 09:54, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This requires a mention here. The prohibition on Pakistani actors has been made compulsory. Source: Khaleej Times [1]. 2.51.20.34 ( talk) 14:11, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The number of deaths was changed from 41 to 50 in this edit. It looks like this change was made by a vandalism-only account. Before I block this account, this is vandalism, right? NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 15:17, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
According to Dawn, "Qureshi condemned the bombing..." [5]. Therefore this should be in the article. Bless sins ( talk) 01:43, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Gazoth reverted an edit, saying "Source says nothing of the sort" [6]
The edit in question added:
[United States] also urged Pakistan to cooperate with the investigation and punish those responsible.
The source [7] says:
Department deputy spokesman Robert Palladino told reporters on Tuesday..."We urge Pakistan to fully cooperate with the investigation into the attack and to punish anyone responsible."
The edit in question also added:
Pakistan said it was ready to cooperate with such an investigation.
The source [8] says:
[Pakistani PM Imran] Khan said in a recorded statement, adding that Islamabad was ready to cooperate with New Delhi on the Kashmir attack investigation.
How is this not what the source said? Bless sins ( talk) 01:50, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Bless sins, your recent addition Pakistan banned the group in 2002, although some say ISI continues to provides it backing. However, Jaish-e-Mohammed has also attacked Pakistani military targets in the past.
seems like synthesis to me. The BBC source states Unlike the militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), which unquestioningly follows the politically dominant Pakistan army's orders, the Jaish has not shrunk from attacking Pakistani military targets.
which implies that ISI is not in total control of JeM. However, your placement appears to question the assertion of ISI backing to JeM, which was not called into question by the BBC source. —
Gazoth (
talk)
05:47, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:52, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Why was this removed? [10] The Dawn article directly rebuts India's claim that Pakistan's PM had not offered condolences, when, in fact, the FM had. Removing this, while leaving the Indian claim in is a violation of WP:NPOV. Bless sins ( talk) 01:17, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Any way to integrate this source into the article? ∯WBG converse 08:27, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
For sympthy of sodiers and their family can we add 'shaheed' in place of killed? Indiamerijaan2001 ( talk) 10:35, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
There is no citation showing that it was a Mahindra Scorpio. This article says it is a Maruti Eeco. ( https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/nia-says-close-to-solving-case-finds-clear-pakistan-link-in-pulwama-attack/story-etgjHCBy8DehwTpvHL9HPO.html) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RedBulbBlueBlood9911 ( talk • contribs) 06:15, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
2019 Pulwama attack has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add information about retaliatory air strikes by the Indian Air Force on February 26/ 2019 Ayonpradhan ( talk) 05:53, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
2019 Pulwama attack has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Aftermath: Did India strike a terrorist camp base? This is only Indian claim. Pakistan only agrees Indian jets crossed LoC but claims there was no attack and the payload was dropped "in haste" when Indian flights were escaping after PAF scrambled their own jets. The claim that a terrorist camp was attacked should be removed as it is not yet established. https://www.dawn.com/news/1466038/indian-aircraft-violate-loc-scramble-back-after-pafs-timely-response-ispr Libin Scaria ( talk) 11:50, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
This edit [11] is misleading because Turkey also expressed support for Pakistan. It is a violation of WP:NPOV to mention the condemnation but not its support for Pakistan. Bless sins ( talk) 15:19, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Kapur blames both India and Pakistan for the insurgency that started in the 1980s. He clearly accuses India of starting it by rigging elections, and clearly accuses Pakistan of backing it. Hence, edits in which his blame of India is considered "alleged", but his blame of Pakistan is taken at face value, are not appropriate. Bless sins ( talk) 16:44, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
"The extensive electoral malfeasances that they witnessed in 1987 convinced this younger generation of Kashmiris that the national government in New delhi had scant regard for their political rights and reckless disregard for democratic procedures. With no other institutional recourse open for expressing their disenchantment with the flawed political process, they resorted to violence. The insurgency has taken the lives of tens of thousands, forced hundreds of thousands from their homes and shows no sign of abating." Source: Explaining the Kashmir Insurgency: Political Mobilization and Institutional Decay by Šumit Ganguly.
I argue that the Kashmiri insurgency arose out of a process of political mobilization that was juxtaposed with steady institutional decay. The political mobilization of Kashmiris started later than in the rest of the Indian state, but it accelerated dramatically after the 1970s. Institutional decay in Kashmir began as early as the 1950s, much earlier than in the rest of India. These two trends intersected as a new generation of Kashmiris emerged on the political scene.
There are many sources that say that majority of militants in Indian Kashmir are of local and not foreign origin. Some of these are Indian sources.
Bless sins ( talk) 23:50, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Kashmiris want to have Independent state, not a part of Ind or Pak. Atleast 85% valley want Independnet statehood. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Undertaker fan tombstone ( talk • contribs) 14:05, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
@ Gazoth: Can you explain the removal of the following content: [18]
In 2012, the insurgency dropped to an all time low. [1] However, between 2014 and 2018, the Indian government reported a 176% rise in number of terror incidents. [2]
A rising number of young locals from Indian administered Kashmir have joined the militancy. [3] [4]
The rise has been attributed to various Indian government policies, [5] including its human rights abuses, [6] and its "tough" response to protests. [1]
All of the sources used here are reliable. Bless sins ( talk) 03:41, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
References
![]() | This
edit request to
2019 Pulwama attack has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
A change from The United States condemned the attack and added it would work with India in counterterrorism efforts; it singled out Pakistan for its alleged role in the attack.
to The United States condemned the attack and added it would work with India in counterterrorism efforts.
because the cited source does not mention anything regarding the second half of this sentence. Donkeykong91 ( talk) 15:35, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
This section could and should be condensed down into a couple of sentences. As a tertiary source, we should summarise secondary sources, not quote them, especially when the material quoted is so very mundane. -- MarchOrDie ( talk) 22:22, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
2019 Pulwama attack has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Request : To make use of MARTYRED instead of KILLED for the CRPF Personnel. Pundareekaksh ( talk) 09:02, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
"Two" personnels were martyred from TAMILNADU... Not"one" Catherine Bertini ( talk) 16:19, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
2019 Pulwama attack has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the opening para - please add the following refs:
Refs -
These are National Dailies in India and should be referenced along with the BBC source.
Moreover @
Kautilya3: please remove the footnote you have added to the CRPF line in the first paragraph (footnote a) because it doesn't make any sense. The CRPF article is already linked and thus a footnote is not required to tell the reader what CRPF is.
47.30.212.255 (
talk)
13:02, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
2019 Pulwama attack has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Here is the complete list of the martyred CRPF jawans:
223.230.77.40 ( talk) 17:56, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Please consider changing the first sentence from "...was attacked by a vehicle-bound suicide bomber at Lethpora (near Awantipora) in the Pulwama district,..." to "...was attacked by a vehicle-borne suicide bomber at Lethpora (near Awantipora) in the Pulwama district,...". This is a grammatical edit and assumes that the intent of the text was to indicate the mode of attack, not that the attacker was destined to hit the bus or that the attacker was physically tied or shackled in the attacking vehicle. Emphasis for identification only.
Malchemist (
talk) 01:15, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Done Good point. --
MarchOrDie (
talk)
01:53, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
International reactions by Heads of the states, Ambassadors, High Commissioner, External Affairs Ministers etc to international/transnational issues are needed to be noted in detail. They should not be briefed up in one or two lines. - Vaikunda Raja :talk: 04:30, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
@ Gotitbro:, the section "Reactions" from the article 2019 Pulwama attack was removed and new article was created with the title Reactions to the 2019 Pulwama attack, please take a look. - Vaikunda Raja :talk: 10:17, 17 February 2019 (UTC
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
@ Vaikunda Raja: Again this has been done. Please wait for the AFD to reach aa consensus, then you can add/remove the Reactions section. Why are you adding/removing it again and again? @ Gotitbro: I am sorry for having misread your edit summary, please ignore that comment. 119.82.70.109 ( talk) 11:01, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Article fully protected for two days. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 11:35, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
2019 Pulwama attack has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change death count in infobox from 40 to 41, the format is generally 41 (40 CRPF personnel + 1 suicide bomber). -- QEDK ( 後 ☕ 桜) 15:09, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Suicide bombers are not human they are monsters they dont need to be calculated Indiamerijaan2001 ( talk) 12:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
2019 Pulwama attack has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add below to reactions. Rahul Gandhi is the president of INC , his reaction is important.
Rahul Gandhi said that he and his Congress party would support the government and would "not get into any other discussion for the next couple of days". [1]
2607:FEA8:6A0:44D:898D:64E9:2B6F:F5C6 ( talk) Indian 2607:FEA8:6A0:44D:898D:64E9:2B6F:F5C6 ( talk) 17:08, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
References
{{
edit protected}}
template. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
06:59, 18 February 2019 (UTC)![]() | This
edit request to
2019 Pulwama attack has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In aftermath section, request to change "Kashmiri students were attacked in Dehradun by Bajrang Dal and Viswa Hindu Parishad" to "Kashmiri students were allegedly attacked in Dehradun by Bajrang Dal and Viswa Hindu Parishad" or be removed completely. Both the sources supporting this used "allegedly" in their prose as well as headlines. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 04:27, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
2019 Pulwama attack has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
REMOVE: (It is widely accepted among security analysts that Jaish-e-Mohammed is the creation of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence, which continues to provide it backing.)
![]() | This
edit request to
2019 Pulwama attack has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
ADD to the beginning of Background section:
ADD to Reactions section:
Is your request uncontroversial?" requirement anyway since it doesn't seem to be either uncontroversial or have an existing consensus. Nil Einne ( talk) 14:32, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
References
![]() | This
edit request to
2019 Pulwama attack has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please update the article. 4 more CRPF men killed, death toll rises 49. [1] — Bukhari (Talk!) 06:26, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
References
References
Lot of information can be added in this section like:
Reliable references are covering all stories. Sumit Singh T 10:32, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
@ Nil Einne: and @ FR30799386: There are many neutral sources out there which talk about the background and the subject itself at the same time such as WashingtonPost and Dawn. My suggestion is we revert this edit and add these sources inline. After reading this source there seems no correlation either between the incidents mentioned in the start of the background section. MehrajMir (talk) 09:54, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This requires a mention here. The prohibition on Pakistani actors has been made compulsory. Source: Khaleej Times [1]. 2.51.20.34 ( talk) 14:11, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The number of deaths was changed from 41 to 50 in this edit. It looks like this change was made by a vandalism-only account. Before I block this account, this is vandalism, right? NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 15:17, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
According to Dawn, "Qureshi condemned the bombing..." [5]. Therefore this should be in the article. Bless sins ( talk) 01:43, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Gazoth reverted an edit, saying "Source says nothing of the sort" [6]
The edit in question added:
[United States] also urged Pakistan to cooperate with the investigation and punish those responsible.
The source [7] says:
Department deputy spokesman Robert Palladino told reporters on Tuesday..."We urge Pakistan to fully cooperate with the investigation into the attack and to punish anyone responsible."
The edit in question also added:
Pakistan said it was ready to cooperate with such an investigation.
The source [8] says:
[Pakistani PM Imran] Khan said in a recorded statement, adding that Islamabad was ready to cooperate with New Delhi on the Kashmir attack investigation.
How is this not what the source said? Bless sins ( talk) 01:50, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Bless sins, your recent addition Pakistan banned the group in 2002, although some say ISI continues to provides it backing. However, Jaish-e-Mohammed has also attacked Pakistani military targets in the past.
seems like synthesis to me. The BBC source states Unlike the militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), which unquestioningly follows the politically dominant Pakistan army's orders, the Jaish has not shrunk from attacking Pakistani military targets.
which implies that ISI is not in total control of JeM. However, your placement appears to question the assertion of ISI backing to JeM, which was not called into question by the BBC source. —
Gazoth (
talk)
05:47, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:52, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Why was this removed? [10] The Dawn article directly rebuts India's claim that Pakistan's PM had not offered condolences, when, in fact, the FM had. Removing this, while leaving the Indian claim in is a violation of WP:NPOV. Bless sins ( talk) 01:17, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Any way to integrate this source into the article? ∯WBG converse 08:27, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
For sympthy of sodiers and their family can we add 'shaheed' in place of killed? Indiamerijaan2001 ( talk) 10:35, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
There is no citation showing that it was a Mahindra Scorpio. This article says it is a Maruti Eeco. ( https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/nia-says-close-to-solving-case-finds-clear-pakistan-link-in-pulwama-attack/story-etgjHCBy8DehwTpvHL9HPO.html) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RedBulbBlueBlood9911 ( talk • contribs) 06:15, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
2019 Pulwama attack has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add information about retaliatory air strikes by the Indian Air Force on February 26/ 2019 Ayonpradhan ( talk) 05:53, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
2019 Pulwama attack has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Aftermath: Did India strike a terrorist camp base? This is only Indian claim. Pakistan only agrees Indian jets crossed LoC but claims there was no attack and the payload was dropped "in haste" when Indian flights were escaping after PAF scrambled their own jets. The claim that a terrorist camp was attacked should be removed as it is not yet established. https://www.dawn.com/news/1466038/indian-aircraft-violate-loc-scramble-back-after-pafs-timely-response-ispr Libin Scaria ( talk) 11:50, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
This edit [11] is misleading because Turkey also expressed support for Pakistan. It is a violation of WP:NPOV to mention the condemnation but not its support for Pakistan. Bless sins ( talk) 15:19, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Kapur blames both India and Pakistan for the insurgency that started in the 1980s. He clearly accuses India of starting it by rigging elections, and clearly accuses Pakistan of backing it. Hence, edits in which his blame of India is considered "alleged", but his blame of Pakistan is taken at face value, are not appropriate. Bless sins ( talk) 16:44, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
"The extensive electoral malfeasances that they witnessed in 1987 convinced this younger generation of Kashmiris that the national government in New delhi had scant regard for their political rights and reckless disregard for democratic procedures. With no other institutional recourse open for expressing their disenchantment with the flawed political process, they resorted to violence. The insurgency has taken the lives of tens of thousands, forced hundreds of thousands from their homes and shows no sign of abating." Source: Explaining the Kashmir Insurgency: Political Mobilization and Institutional Decay by Šumit Ganguly.
I argue that the Kashmiri insurgency arose out of a process of political mobilization that was juxtaposed with steady institutional decay. The political mobilization of Kashmiris started later than in the rest of the Indian state, but it accelerated dramatically after the 1970s. Institutional decay in Kashmir began as early as the 1950s, much earlier than in the rest of India. These two trends intersected as a new generation of Kashmiris emerged on the political scene.
There are many sources that say that majority of militants in Indian Kashmir are of local and not foreign origin. Some of these are Indian sources.
Bless sins ( talk) 23:50, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Kashmiris want to have Independent state, not a part of Ind or Pak. Atleast 85% valley want Independnet statehood. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Undertaker fan tombstone ( talk • contribs) 14:05, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
@ Gazoth: Can you explain the removal of the following content: [18]
In 2012, the insurgency dropped to an all time low. [1] However, between 2014 and 2018, the Indian government reported a 176% rise in number of terror incidents. [2]
A rising number of young locals from Indian administered Kashmir have joined the militancy. [3] [4]
The rise has been attributed to various Indian government policies, [5] including its human rights abuses, [6] and its "tough" response to protests. [1]
All of the sources used here are reliable. Bless sins ( talk) 03:41, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
References
![]() | This
edit request to
2019 Pulwama attack has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
A change from The United States condemned the attack and added it would work with India in counterterrorism efforts; it singled out Pakistan for its alleged role in the attack.
to The United States condemned the attack and added it would work with India in counterterrorism efforts.
because the cited source does not mention anything regarding the second half of this sentence. Donkeykong91 ( talk) 15:35, 3 March 2019 (UTC)