This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2015 Pacific hurricane season article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | 2015 Pacific hurricane season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||
![]() | 2015 Pacific hurricane season is the main article in the 2015 Pacific hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Specialized archives: Tracking Data \\ ACE calcs |
Other basin talkpages (2015): Atlantic - W. Pacific - Central and East Pacific - N. Indian - S. Hemisphere |
For now, I have listed 1E (now Andres) using PDT, but its first public advisory uses MDT, and states that the use of local time zones will now be used for the first time this year. Should we continue using PDT or start using whatever time zone is indicated by the public advisory?-- Jasper Deng (talk) 09:20, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
No need for a note, but IMO add it to the seasonal summary section of this article and to the lead in the timeline. Y E Pacific Hurricane 19:10, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Do we go by NHC or the best track? If we go by NHC advisories, it will be 95 knots (90 knots at 21Z and 95 knots at 03Z). But if we go by the operational best track it should be 100 knots (a major hurricane). Krit-tonkla talk 10:35, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Guess what? Andres took care of business by becoming a major, so it's less of an issue. Thank the storm :P Also, NHC is the RMSC for the EPAC and ATL, so that takes priority over the JTWC. Y E Pacific Hurricane 20:46, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
← I'm working with Dr. Landsea on the Atlantic reanalysis project, currently finishing up the last few storms of 1964. Cyclonebiskit ( talk) 19:45, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Should we be concerned that the Running Best Track doesn't have 130 kt? ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 01:06, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
In the past, the actual storm titles have been included and not just their names (at least in the EPac and Atl). Jasper Deng is the person who first added the infobox for what is now Andres, and he just put Two-E in the infobox (without the "Tropical Depression" part of the storm's title). I don't remember him being here last year, so I can't say anything about previous instances of him in particular, but at least last year in the Pacific, we always included "Tropical Depression", "Tropical Storm", and "Hurricane" in the infoboxes. I have been reverted twice by Typhoon2013/Nino Marakot, and as a result, I am forced to bring this to the talk page. Maybe you don't have to change it, but the full title of 01E is "Hurricane Andres", not just "Andres", and if I am willing to take the time to change it when the storm later weakens, what is the purpose in re-removing the "Tropical Depression/Tropical Storm/Hurricane" from the infobox? Dustin (talk) 03:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I might start a "start-off" article for Hurricane Blanca sometime later. Since it is going to make landfall soon (maybe) and its an early landfalling storm, I believe Blanca does suppose to have an article. Typhoon2013 (talk) 21:20, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi. What I am really annoyed about storm images are the size. That's why I changed the real Blanca image to a better size, and yes it does sucks if the image is not in gallery version. However Dustin reverted me because it's not in gallery version (which the gallery version is at a small size). There are three choices, unless we fix the size of it, find another photo at peak intensity (luckily Blanca made a second peak), or just keep searching a better Blanca image. If we just leave it alone, it kind of sucks with the image of Blanca being the smallest (maybe). What do you guys think of Blanca's image? Typhoon2013 (talk) 04:20, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
I feel we are running out of names - what if we do? Do we make a whole article then? Do we ask TWC or NOAA for names? What will we do?? 71.66.245.204 ( talk) 14:31, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Lately, I don't see that much people updating on current TCs in this page. No one edited / updated the infobox during Hilda. Just saying that I am a person who only edits in the WPac pages, however I'm interested in the CPac page which is a page like this. Also since this year is predicted to be a 'hyperactive' season especially when we broke the record of having the most Central Pacific named storms by tomorrow (maybe), we need to contribute and help this article become a good one like the rest. I mean, we need to add more information to make the article look good. @ Yellow Evan: and @ Iune:, I thought you were the guys who always edit in the EPac pages? Also Iune, why didn't you edit anything on TS Iune last month? Typhoon2013 (talk) 06:58, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
@
Typhoon2013: I'm new to this, I'm gonna try and help out when I manage to learn how to edit stuff properly. I'm really super interested in TCs though :(
Izmik (
talk)
07:38, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
@
Typhoon2013: Did I update Loke's infoboxthingy properly? I just did one for Danny too.
Izmik (
talk)
00:23, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
I might be wrong but looking at the CPHC's hurricane map it looks like Loke came closer to the Aluetian Islands than the person that made the track map gave credit for. Not sure, but was just checking into it. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.11.179.89 ( talk) 02:16, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Is Kilo the first CPac named storm that became a major hurricane since Iniki? HurricaneGonzalo ( talk) 22:54, 30 August 2015 (UTC) maybe we can do an aticle for Huricane kilo because it was one of the three category 4 Huricanes, along with Ignacio and Jimena?-- 68.6.143.63 ( talk) 20:06, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
@ HurricaneGonzalo: No, the most recent storm that became a major hurricane in the CPHC was Neki in 2009.
We need a section for Ignacio and Kevin, plus sources for some other sections. I'll try to help out with current storms if they come along so others can help update other stuff, but I have school stuff. Izmik ( talk) 22:17, 5 September 2015 (UTC) I think we should have an article for Huricane Jimena because it almost became a Catgory 5 Huricane -- 107.77.229.152 ( talk) 20:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello editors of this page, I was looking at this page just for fun. I went down and I saw that the Hurricane Marty section was completely empty! I decided to check the page history to see what happened and who removed it but I did not find any history match. What happened? If anyone has an answer to this question please reply below this comment or on my talk page. Thanks, 50.141.33.0 (talk) 06:32, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi guys, I just wanted to confirm if plagiarism is a problem on Wikipedia. I wanted to check because for the Hurricane Marty section I copied almost exactly as it was written in the reference. If it is a problem, someone please reword the sentences. Thanks, 73.223.175.207 ( talk) 05:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
According to the table in the List of Pacific hurricanes, 2015 is now the second busiest within the basin. However is it tied with 1985? Well the number of named storms and hurricanes have the same amount in both seasons, however there are more M. hurricanes this year. So is it really the second busiest, which makes 1985 now third? Or do we follow the amount of named storms? *At least it is likely to be second because models predict Rick forming during Nov. Typhoon2013 (talk) 03:12, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
A category 5 hurricane heading straight into Mexico is noteworthy here. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 02:50, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
It's incredible that at this time yesterday, Patricia was only a tropical storm. I think it is a custom of sorts that Category 5 hurricanes in the East Pacific have articles written about them, and this cyclone looks to not only be intense but destructive as well. It might be a bit premature, but it may be worth establishing this as the primary topic of Hurricane Patricia. Thoughts? Drafts in the works? Dustin (talk) 02:51, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
TXPN41 PHFO 310002
TCSNP1
CENTRAL PACIFIC TROPICAL CYCLONE SUMMARY - FIXES
NWS CENTRAL PACIFIC HURRICANE CENTER HONOLULU HI
0000 UTC THU DEC 31 2015
A. Tropical depression 09-c.
B. 30/2330Z.
C. 2.0°N.
D. 175.2°W.
E. Hmwri8/goes-15.
F. T2.0/2.0/d1.5/24 hrs.
G. Vis/ir/eir.
H. Remarks: A 0.25 wrap yields a DT of 1.5. The MET is 2.0 and the Pat is 1.5. Due to constraints, the FT is based on the met.
I. Addl positions none.
$$
Eaton.
Should we add it? ABC paulista ( talk) 01:35, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on 2015 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:20, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Now that Malia's report is up, I think it's time to update its track map here. @ Cyclonebiskit: and @ Supportstorm: could you guys please provide this? Thanks. ABC paulista ( talk) 18:56, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
@ Yellow Evan: has been somewhat hesitant against my recent addition of noting that Patricia was the second-strongest tropical cyclone worldwide, considering the storm is a bit more notable for that, and I would like some opinions on this as to why this is more notable for inclusion in infobox. -- MarioProtIV ( talk/ contribs) 20:44, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
It's about time the northern hemisphere basins recognized that January storms are generally continuations of the previous season. The only references CPHC has provided thus far are via Facebook. Can we source Facebook for something like this, since it is coming straight from CPHC? Not sure how to proceed reference wise. Thegreatdr ( talk) 20:42, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
which as I posted, the CPHC still lists Pali as a 2016 TC on its website in 3 places. And I wouldn't consider Bob Henson and Jeff Masters Joe Schmo. Y E Pacific Hurricane 21:54, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
The CPHC considers Pali an " unusual out of season tropical cyclone." More precisely, Pali "isn't counted in either 2015 or 2016 hurricane season" (from correspondance between I and the chief CPHC/NWS HNL meteorologist Chris Brenchley). Off-season storms are simply that: not in season. Since Pali was influenced by conditions that carried over from the 2015 season (Brenchley remarked that "continuation of cyclone activity" in this case meant "residual warm waters and El Nino conditions"), I think it should definitely get a mention (or even a more extended, though still brief, summary) in the 2015 season article, but its storm section should rest in the 2016 season article since it formed in 2016. Given that the official hurricane season year-to-year is separated by several months, I think this is an appropriate placement; no official system exists to assign a parent season to off-season cyclones. If we were to place Pali entirely in the 2015 article, this would introduce a case-by-case need to assess which season off-season storm X belongs to, and once again, no official, verifiable, and unambiguous system exists for that (we would get into WP:OR quickly). The only unambiguous and clear-cut placement guidance we have are the dates of formation and dissipation of Pali, which leans it towards the 2016 article. That said, I'm still undecided on how to count off-season storms in post-season statistics (for, say, the infobox), though if we were to follow the official lead of the CPHC, it would not be counted in any seasonal aggregate. TheAustinMan( Talk· Works) 02:19, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Now that Oho's report is up, I think it's time to add its extratropical phase on its track map here. @ Cyclonebiskit: and @ Supportstorm: could you guys please provide this? Thanks. ABC paulista ( talk) 21:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Now two storms had their reports released: Niala and Nine-C. @ Cyclonebiskit: and @ Supportstorm: could you guys please provide their updated tracks, please? Thanks. ABC paulista ( talk) 20:00, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Ok guys, let's reach a consensus here. According to the Nine-C's TCR, the depression was officially downgraded into a remnant low at 00:00 UTC on January 1, 2016, so can we say that the system can be considered one of the ones that existed in two calendar years like Zeta and Jangmi? @ KN2731: and @ Cyclonebiskit: seem to agree that its dissipation was on December 31, 2015, but @ Typhoon2013: and @ MarioProtIV: seem to defend that the dissipation occured on January 1, 2016. So, Nine-C dissipated on December 31 2015 or January 1, 2016? ABC paulista ( talk) 15:34, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on 2015 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:10, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
@ Cyclonebiskit: and @ Supportstorm: could you guys please update the track of Tropical Storm Iune? Its report is up now. ABC paulista ( talk) 16:26, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Hurricane Noah ( talk · contribs) 20:28, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Will do in a bit.
Noah
Talk
20:28, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
I hate to say it, but this will need a decent bit of work. I will organize it for you to make it easier, but I will have a lot to point out due to the number of systems and variance within them. Noah Talk 20:42, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Andres
Blanca
Carlos
Halola
Dolores
Enrique
Integers greater than nine expressible in one or two words may be expressed either in numerals or in wordsthough. IIRC I spell out numbers if they can be expressed in one word. ~ KN2731 { t · c} 05:15, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Guillermo
Eleven-E
Loke
Kilo
Ignacio
Jimena
Linda
Sixeteen-E
Oho
Eight-C
Nora
Olaf
Patricia
|abbr=on
. Not sure why the convert template doesn't have an abbreviation for acres. Maybe I'll do away with the template entirely. ~
KN2731 {
t ·
c}
12:57, 16 April 2019 (UTC)Rick
Sandra
I'm not a fan of interjecting in GA reviews but I just saw this GAN, and given my tenure and this article's importance, felt the need to interject. Could stuff from Stormdata be used to flesh out the sections for the US storms? Also use the NWS for Hawaii impact. Y E Pacific Hurricane 05:47, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
@ KN2731: I thoroughly went through the article over an hour and a half and fixed the remaining minor issues. I saw you still have some content to add, which will definitely improve the article. However, I feel the criteria for GA are met at this time and am passing this as a GA. I would highly suggest nominating the 2015 Pacific hurricane season for good topic now that all articles are good quality. If you really wanted to, you could easily get this to A class and possibly even FA at a later time. Whatever you decide to do, good luck. Sincerely, Noah Talk 21:58, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
@ Destroyeraa: The standard test is whether this article can accommodate the storm's impacts well. I think it does, and other stuff exists arguments do not hold water.-- Jasper Deng (talk) 19:53, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
If someone can expand Dolores' MH into two paragraphs, and add some info for Mexico, I'd support keeping the article. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 18:38, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Like I said before, add a bit about Mexico. That would make it at least start class worthy. Fleshing our the MH more and adding more Cali/SW US would be needed for C/GA class. Hurricanehink mobile ( talk) 18:09, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
@ Jasper Deng, Master of Time, Hurricanehink, and Hurricane Noah: I have worked on the article, adding information about preps and impacts for Mexico, as well as some new information about a postponed Los Angeles Angels baseball game for impacts in the U.S. Could use some more sources and an expansion in the MH, but I think it is at least start-class worthy. Nott quite C class, but I'll keep working on it. What do you guys think? ~ Destroyeraa 🌀 19:18, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2015 Pacific hurricane season article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | 2015 Pacific hurricane season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||
![]() | 2015 Pacific hurricane season is the main article in the 2015 Pacific hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Specialized archives: Tracking Data \\ ACE calcs |
Other basin talkpages (2015): Atlantic - W. Pacific - Central and East Pacific - N. Indian - S. Hemisphere |
For now, I have listed 1E (now Andres) using PDT, but its first public advisory uses MDT, and states that the use of local time zones will now be used for the first time this year. Should we continue using PDT or start using whatever time zone is indicated by the public advisory?-- Jasper Deng (talk) 09:20, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
No need for a note, but IMO add it to the seasonal summary section of this article and to the lead in the timeline. Y E Pacific Hurricane 19:10, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Do we go by NHC or the best track? If we go by NHC advisories, it will be 95 knots (90 knots at 21Z and 95 knots at 03Z). But if we go by the operational best track it should be 100 knots (a major hurricane). Krit-tonkla talk 10:35, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Guess what? Andres took care of business by becoming a major, so it's less of an issue. Thank the storm :P Also, NHC is the RMSC for the EPAC and ATL, so that takes priority over the JTWC. Y E Pacific Hurricane 20:46, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
← I'm working with Dr. Landsea on the Atlantic reanalysis project, currently finishing up the last few storms of 1964. Cyclonebiskit ( talk) 19:45, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Should we be concerned that the Running Best Track doesn't have 130 kt? ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 01:06, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
In the past, the actual storm titles have been included and not just their names (at least in the EPac and Atl). Jasper Deng is the person who first added the infobox for what is now Andres, and he just put Two-E in the infobox (without the "Tropical Depression" part of the storm's title). I don't remember him being here last year, so I can't say anything about previous instances of him in particular, but at least last year in the Pacific, we always included "Tropical Depression", "Tropical Storm", and "Hurricane" in the infoboxes. I have been reverted twice by Typhoon2013/Nino Marakot, and as a result, I am forced to bring this to the talk page. Maybe you don't have to change it, but the full title of 01E is "Hurricane Andres", not just "Andres", and if I am willing to take the time to change it when the storm later weakens, what is the purpose in re-removing the "Tropical Depression/Tropical Storm/Hurricane" from the infobox? Dustin (talk) 03:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I might start a "start-off" article for Hurricane Blanca sometime later. Since it is going to make landfall soon (maybe) and its an early landfalling storm, I believe Blanca does suppose to have an article. Typhoon2013 (talk) 21:20, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi. What I am really annoyed about storm images are the size. That's why I changed the real Blanca image to a better size, and yes it does sucks if the image is not in gallery version. However Dustin reverted me because it's not in gallery version (which the gallery version is at a small size). There are three choices, unless we fix the size of it, find another photo at peak intensity (luckily Blanca made a second peak), or just keep searching a better Blanca image. If we just leave it alone, it kind of sucks with the image of Blanca being the smallest (maybe). What do you guys think of Blanca's image? Typhoon2013 (talk) 04:20, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
I feel we are running out of names - what if we do? Do we make a whole article then? Do we ask TWC or NOAA for names? What will we do?? 71.66.245.204 ( talk) 14:31, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Lately, I don't see that much people updating on current TCs in this page. No one edited / updated the infobox during Hilda. Just saying that I am a person who only edits in the WPac pages, however I'm interested in the CPac page which is a page like this. Also since this year is predicted to be a 'hyperactive' season especially when we broke the record of having the most Central Pacific named storms by tomorrow (maybe), we need to contribute and help this article become a good one like the rest. I mean, we need to add more information to make the article look good. @ Yellow Evan: and @ Iune:, I thought you were the guys who always edit in the EPac pages? Also Iune, why didn't you edit anything on TS Iune last month? Typhoon2013 (talk) 06:58, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
@
Typhoon2013: I'm new to this, I'm gonna try and help out when I manage to learn how to edit stuff properly. I'm really super interested in TCs though :(
Izmik (
talk)
07:38, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
@
Typhoon2013: Did I update Loke's infoboxthingy properly? I just did one for Danny too.
Izmik (
talk)
00:23, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
I might be wrong but looking at the CPHC's hurricane map it looks like Loke came closer to the Aluetian Islands than the person that made the track map gave credit for. Not sure, but was just checking into it. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.11.179.89 ( talk) 02:16, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Is Kilo the first CPac named storm that became a major hurricane since Iniki? HurricaneGonzalo ( talk) 22:54, 30 August 2015 (UTC) maybe we can do an aticle for Huricane kilo because it was one of the three category 4 Huricanes, along with Ignacio and Jimena?-- 68.6.143.63 ( talk) 20:06, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
@ HurricaneGonzalo: No, the most recent storm that became a major hurricane in the CPHC was Neki in 2009.
We need a section for Ignacio and Kevin, plus sources for some other sections. I'll try to help out with current storms if they come along so others can help update other stuff, but I have school stuff. Izmik ( talk) 22:17, 5 September 2015 (UTC) I think we should have an article for Huricane Jimena because it almost became a Catgory 5 Huricane -- 107.77.229.152 ( talk) 20:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello editors of this page, I was looking at this page just for fun. I went down and I saw that the Hurricane Marty section was completely empty! I decided to check the page history to see what happened and who removed it but I did not find any history match. What happened? If anyone has an answer to this question please reply below this comment or on my talk page. Thanks, 50.141.33.0 (talk) 06:32, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi guys, I just wanted to confirm if plagiarism is a problem on Wikipedia. I wanted to check because for the Hurricane Marty section I copied almost exactly as it was written in the reference. If it is a problem, someone please reword the sentences. Thanks, 73.223.175.207 ( talk) 05:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
According to the table in the List of Pacific hurricanes, 2015 is now the second busiest within the basin. However is it tied with 1985? Well the number of named storms and hurricanes have the same amount in both seasons, however there are more M. hurricanes this year. So is it really the second busiest, which makes 1985 now third? Or do we follow the amount of named storms? *At least it is likely to be second because models predict Rick forming during Nov. Typhoon2013 (talk) 03:12, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
A category 5 hurricane heading straight into Mexico is noteworthy here. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 02:50, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
It's incredible that at this time yesterday, Patricia was only a tropical storm. I think it is a custom of sorts that Category 5 hurricanes in the East Pacific have articles written about them, and this cyclone looks to not only be intense but destructive as well. It might be a bit premature, but it may be worth establishing this as the primary topic of Hurricane Patricia. Thoughts? Drafts in the works? Dustin (talk) 02:51, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
TXPN41 PHFO 310002
TCSNP1
CENTRAL PACIFIC TROPICAL CYCLONE SUMMARY - FIXES
NWS CENTRAL PACIFIC HURRICANE CENTER HONOLULU HI
0000 UTC THU DEC 31 2015
A. Tropical depression 09-c.
B. 30/2330Z.
C. 2.0°N.
D. 175.2°W.
E. Hmwri8/goes-15.
F. T2.0/2.0/d1.5/24 hrs.
G. Vis/ir/eir.
H. Remarks: A 0.25 wrap yields a DT of 1.5. The MET is 2.0 and the Pat is 1.5. Due to constraints, the FT is based on the met.
I. Addl positions none.
$$
Eaton.
Should we add it? ABC paulista ( talk) 01:35, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on 2015 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:20, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Now that Malia's report is up, I think it's time to update its track map here. @ Cyclonebiskit: and @ Supportstorm: could you guys please provide this? Thanks. ABC paulista ( talk) 18:56, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
@ Yellow Evan: has been somewhat hesitant against my recent addition of noting that Patricia was the second-strongest tropical cyclone worldwide, considering the storm is a bit more notable for that, and I would like some opinions on this as to why this is more notable for inclusion in infobox. -- MarioProtIV ( talk/ contribs) 20:44, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
It's about time the northern hemisphere basins recognized that January storms are generally continuations of the previous season. The only references CPHC has provided thus far are via Facebook. Can we source Facebook for something like this, since it is coming straight from CPHC? Not sure how to proceed reference wise. Thegreatdr ( talk) 20:42, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
which as I posted, the CPHC still lists Pali as a 2016 TC on its website in 3 places. And I wouldn't consider Bob Henson and Jeff Masters Joe Schmo. Y E Pacific Hurricane 21:54, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
The CPHC considers Pali an " unusual out of season tropical cyclone." More precisely, Pali "isn't counted in either 2015 or 2016 hurricane season" (from correspondance between I and the chief CPHC/NWS HNL meteorologist Chris Brenchley). Off-season storms are simply that: not in season. Since Pali was influenced by conditions that carried over from the 2015 season (Brenchley remarked that "continuation of cyclone activity" in this case meant "residual warm waters and El Nino conditions"), I think it should definitely get a mention (or even a more extended, though still brief, summary) in the 2015 season article, but its storm section should rest in the 2016 season article since it formed in 2016. Given that the official hurricane season year-to-year is separated by several months, I think this is an appropriate placement; no official system exists to assign a parent season to off-season cyclones. If we were to place Pali entirely in the 2015 article, this would introduce a case-by-case need to assess which season off-season storm X belongs to, and once again, no official, verifiable, and unambiguous system exists for that (we would get into WP:OR quickly). The only unambiguous and clear-cut placement guidance we have are the dates of formation and dissipation of Pali, which leans it towards the 2016 article. That said, I'm still undecided on how to count off-season storms in post-season statistics (for, say, the infobox), though if we were to follow the official lead of the CPHC, it would not be counted in any seasonal aggregate. TheAustinMan( Talk· Works) 02:19, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Now that Oho's report is up, I think it's time to add its extratropical phase on its track map here. @ Cyclonebiskit: and @ Supportstorm: could you guys please provide this? Thanks. ABC paulista ( talk) 21:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Now two storms had their reports released: Niala and Nine-C. @ Cyclonebiskit: and @ Supportstorm: could you guys please provide their updated tracks, please? Thanks. ABC paulista ( talk) 20:00, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Ok guys, let's reach a consensus here. According to the Nine-C's TCR, the depression was officially downgraded into a remnant low at 00:00 UTC on January 1, 2016, so can we say that the system can be considered one of the ones that existed in two calendar years like Zeta and Jangmi? @ KN2731: and @ Cyclonebiskit: seem to agree that its dissipation was on December 31, 2015, but @ Typhoon2013: and @ MarioProtIV: seem to defend that the dissipation occured on January 1, 2016. So, Nine-C dissipated on December 31 2015 or January 1, 2016? ABC paulista ( talk) 15:34, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on 2015 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:10, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
@ Cyclonebiskit: and @ Supportstorm: could you guys please update the track of Tropical Storm Iune? Its report is up now. ABC paulista ( talk) 16:26, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Hurricane Noah ( talk · contribs) 20:28, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Will do in a bit.
Noah
Talk
20:28, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
I hate to say it, but this will need a decent bit of work. I will organize it for you to make it easier, but I will have a lot to point out due to the number of systems and variance within them. Noah Talk 20:42, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Andres
Blanca
Carlos
Halola
Dolores
Enrique
Integers greater than nine expressible in one or two words may be expressed either in numerals or in wordsthough. IIRC I spell out numbers if they can be expressed in one word. ~ KN2731 { t · c} 05:15, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Guillermo
Eleven-E
Loke
Kilo
Ignacio
Jimena
Linda
Sixeteen-E
Oho
Eight-C
Nora
Olaf
Patricia
|abbr=on
. Not sure why the convert template doesn't have an abbreviation for acres. Maybe I'll do away with the template entirely. ~
KN2731 {
t ·
c}
12:57, 16 April 2019 (UTC)Rick
Sandra
I'm not a fan of interjecting in GA reviews but I just saw this GAN, and given my tenure and this article's importance, felt the need to interject. Could stuff from Stormdata be used to flesh out the sections for the US storms? Also use the NWS for Hawaii impact. Y E Pacific Hurricane 05:47, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
@ KN2731: I thoroughly went through the article over an hour and a half and fixed the remaining minor issues. I saw you still have some content to add, which will definitely improve the article. However, I feel the criteria for GA are met at this time and am passing this as a GA. I would highly suggest nominating the 2015 Pacific hurricane season for good topic now that all articles are good quality. If you really wanted to, you could easily get this to A class and possibly even FA at a later time. Whatever you decide to do, good luck. Sincerely, Noah Talk 21:58, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
@ Destroyeraa: The standard test is whether this article can accommodate the storm's impacts well. I think it does, and other stuff exists arguments do not hold water.-- Jasper Deng (talk) 19:53, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
If someone can expand Dolores' MH into two paragraphs, and add some info for Mexico, I'd support keeping the article. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 18:38, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Like I said before, add a bit about Mexico. That would make it at least start class worthy. Fleshing our the MH more and adding more Cali/SW US would be needed for C/GA class. Hurricanehink mobile ( talk) 18:09, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
@ Jasper Deng, Master of Time, Hurricanehink, and Hurricane Noah: I have worked on the article, adding information about preps and impacts for Mexico, as well as some new information about a postponed Los Angeles Angels baseball game for impacts in the U.S. Could use some more sources and an expansion in the MH, but I think it is at least start-class worthy. Nott quite C class, but I'll keep working on it. What do you guys think? ~ Destroyeraa 🌀 19:18, 11 August 2020 (UTC)