This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It's good to include it. It's been there for ages so it has implicit consensus. Orderinchaos, if you wish to change it please discuss here. The table is labelled 2pp history of Canning. Not 2pp history using Canning's current boundaries. All seats get redistributed. It's a wonk of an argument. Perhaps you could help improve the article by adding rather than removing - how about a compromise like adding another row for 2pp swing %? Timeshift ( talk) 00:25, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Breaks all rules and can't even wait for a discussion before forcing their own view on the article with no consensus. VERY un-admin-like. Very displeased at today's events and subsequent bullying and steamrolling. Timeshift ( talk) 00:45, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
I think the issue here is you're too proud to admit you shouldn't have dived in with an edit war and instead go through the talkpage. I hope someone on here, an admin would be nice, would have the balls to call out Orderinchaos (an admin) for his incendiary actions after reviewing the flow of events. Far from admin-like. Very far. Timeshift ( talk) 01:21, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
I have removed what was essentially a collection of links to any political story since the by-election was called, which is so very much not what we are about. I am fairly dubious about the content under "polling issues" and "voter age groups" as well - the latter should be in a single paragraph if at all, and the former I don't think does a great job of explaining its significance (and seems to highlight a few issues for no apparent reason?). Would appreciate further input on this. Frickeg ( talk) 01:09, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Per the weekend West Australian, neither the Labor candidate nor the Liberal candidate are eligible to vote in the by-election, as they have not been residents of the electorate for the required time (one month). Is this worth putting in the article, or is it a bit too trivial? IgnorantArmies (talk) 10:21, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Does anyone know where to find group tickets (preferencing arrangements for each candidate) for the Canning by-election (for example, on the AEC website)? Perhaps the article could have a link to this information on the AEC website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.169.195.148 ( talk) 06:14, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Per WP:NCE:
Examples of "when", "where" and "what" titles
@ The Drover's Wife: is there any compelling reason not to move?
-- Callinus ( talk) 15:01, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Canning by-election, 2015. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:22, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It's good to include it. It's been there for ages so it has implicit consensus. Orderinchaos, if you wish to change it please discuss here. The table is labelled 2pp history of Canning. Not 2pp history using Canning's current boundaries. All seats get redistributed. It's a wonk of an argument. Perhaps you could help improve the article by adding rather than removing - how about a compromise like adding another row for 2pp swing %? Timeshift ( talk) 00:25, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Breaks all rules and can't even wait for a discussion before forcing their own view on the article with no consensus. VERY un-admin-like. Very displeased at today's events and subsequent bullying and steamrolling. Timeshift ( talk) 00:45, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
I think the issue here is you're too proud to admit you shouldn't have dived in with an edit war and instead go through the talkpage. I hope someone on here, an admin would be nice, would have the balls to call out Orderinchaos (an admin) for his incendiary actions after reviewing the flow of events. Far from admin-like. Very far. Timeshift ( talk) 01:21, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
I have removed what was essentially a collection of links to any political story since the by-election was called, which is so very much not what we are about. I am fairly dubious about the content under "polling issues" and "voter age groups" as well - the latter should be in a single paragraph if at all, and the former I don't think does a great job of explaining its significance (and seems to highlight a few issues for no apparent reason?). Would appreciate further input on this. Frickeg ( talk) 01:09, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Per the weekend West Australian, neither the Labor candidate nor the Liberal candidate are eligible to vote in the by-election, as they have not been residents of the electorate for the required time (one month). Is this worth putting in the article, or is it a bit too trivial? IgnorantArmies (talk) 10:21, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Does anyone know where to find group tickets (preferencing arrangements for each candidate) for the Canning by-election (for example, on the AEC website)? Perhaps the article could have a link to this information on the AEC website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.169.195.148 ( talk) 06:14, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Per WP:NCE:
Examples of "when", "where" and "what" titles
@ The Drover's Wife: is there any compelling reason not to move?
-- Callinus ( talk) 15:01, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Canning by-election, 2015. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:22, 30 July 2017 (UTC)