![]() | A news item involving 2013–14 Ashes series was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 20 December 2013. | ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All other sport articles mention their attendances. I have also created a Wikitable here for the attendances taking the information from the scorecard and report from ESPN Cricinfo. Please don't erase these. You can offer another way of representing it if you wish, but please don't erase these. Because all other sport articles mention their attendances, so should we do. Itz arka ( talk) 17:12, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Why is the score being listed as "wickets for runs" when almost every other site in the known universe lists it as "runs for wickets"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.192.232.123 ( talk) 13:49, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Australia regaining The Ashes has been nominated for an In The News entry on Wikipedia's main page. An Admin who might have posted it there has correctly pointed out that absolutely nothing in the three match reports is sourced. What on earth have you editors been doing?
Can anyone who did those reports quickly add the sources they used please? HiLo48 ( talk) 04:17, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
The series was not known by its sponsors name outside Australia. I followed the series very closely and was not aware of the alternative name. It also could be construed that the sponsors changed the first line for their own purposes. I think "known for ... Series" should be moved to the end of the first paragraph as "The series for sponsorship reasons was also known as the ..." PeterGrecian ( talk) 09:03, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
![]() | A news item involving 2013–14 Ashes series was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 20 December 2013. | ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All other sport articles mention their attendances. I have also created a Wikitable here for the attendances taking the information from the scorecard and report from ESPN Cricinfo. Please don't erase these. You can offer another way of representing it if you wish, but please don't erase these. Because all other sport articles mention their attendances, so should we do. Itz arka ( talk) 17:12, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Why is the score being listed as "wickets for runs" when almost every other site in the known universe lists it as "runs for wickets"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.192.232.123 ( talk) 13:49, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Australia regaining The Ashes has been nominated for an In The News entry on Wikipedia's main page. An Admin who might have posted it there has correctly pointed out that absolutely nothing in the three match reports is sourced. What on earth have you editors been doing?
Can anyone who did those reports quickly add the sources they used please? HiLo48 ( talk) 04:17, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
The series was not known by its sponsors name outside Australia. I followed the series very closely and was not aware of the alternative name. It also could be construed that the sponsors changed the first line for their own purposes. I think "known for ... Series" should be moved to the end of the first paragraph as "The series for sponsorship reasons was also known as the ..." PeterGrecian ( talk) 09:03, 19 January 2014 (UTC)