This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2010 Pune bombing article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
2010 Pune bombing received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
A news item involving 2010 Pune bombing was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 14 February 2010. |
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 13, 2012 and February 13, 2020. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from German Bakery was copied or moved into 2010 Pune bombing with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Text and/or other creative content from 2010 Pune blast was copied or moved into 2010 Pune bombing with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 2010 Pune bombing's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "ht":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:04, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
I dont know the really date, but this article says 9/11 2001. Obviously wrong, can someone who knows the right date fix it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.7.184.127 ( talk) 20:27, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
There is a reference to Will Ferrel in the first few lines of this article. Unless someone can prove his involvement I believe it should be removed from the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.38.251.22 ( talk) 20:47, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
There is a alot of vandalism in this article, someone care to fix it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.7.184.127 ( talk • contribs) 20:29, 14 February 2010
The map referred shows the state of Jammu & Kashmir as part of Pakistan. The map be removed/edited. Pyu.agrawal ( talk) 16:25, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Here we have a whole article dedicated to just 10 deaths, but for the terrorist attacks against Pakistanis, we have just a single line for typically 5 to 25 victims per attack. Sorry for using bold, but the lack of neutrality is appalling. As for the difference between state terrorism and non-state terrorism and apparent moral justifications, IMHO that should be neutral or at least NPOV too. See the article on state terrorism if you haven't read it before.
i'm not blaming anybody - this is related to the known problem of systemic bias in the English-language Wikipedia. The numbers of people willing to edit individual pages for each of the drone attacks and to find "reliable sources" are much smaller than the numbers of people willing to edit a page on this one single attack. This problem also includes the subjective concept of "notability". In US/Western Europe and for the best-internet-connected fluent-in-English people in Indian cities, the Pune attack is clearly "notable", but individual drone attacks in Pakistan are not as notable because they did not get as much publicity, and did not kill any US/European citizens, and probably did not kill any young, urban, internet-connected, fluent-in-English Indians.
However, if anybody working on this page is interested in helping to overcome these biases, please go ahead. Probably a practical way to start is to start some individual articles on some of the recent drone attacks. There should be enough Pakistani newspapers online, and some others (e.g. South Asian) that consider Pakistani drone attacks to be as "notable" as suspected-LeT-IM attacks in India. It does seem to me that several of the drone attacks gain a lot of publicity. Moreover, the perpetrator (organisation) is usually known, with only an ambiguity between which US service is responsible for the state-terrorist attack - CIA or army or whatever. Boud ( talk) 13:28, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
I think this list should be sorted by name.
Why in the world are the 2 foreigners listed 1st?
-- vvarkey ( talk) 22:14, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
The nationality of Gokul Nepali in the victim list is actually not ascertained! http://www.nepalnews.com/main/index.php/news-archive/19-general/4168-four-nepalis-injured-in-pune-terror-attack-one-dead-suspected-to-be-nepali.html -- JovianEye ( talk) 07:26, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on 2010 Pune bombing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
TrangaBellam ( talk) 12:03, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
[l]ist the appeals [] for final disposal in the third week of July 2022. So, I assume that the appeal has been decided but the order-copy is not yet uploaded to the portal — maybe, Naushervan will have some ideas? TrangaBellam ( talk) 12:25, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2010 Pune bombing article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
2010 Pune bombing received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
A news item involving 2010 Pune bombing was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 14 February 2010. |
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 13, 2012 and February 13, 2020. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from German Bakery was copied or moved into 2010 Pune bombing with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Text and/or other creative content from 2010 Pune blast was copied or moved into 2010 Pune bombing with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 2010 Pune bombing's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "ht":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:04, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
I dont know the really date, but this article says 9/11 2001. Obviously wrong, can someone who knows the right date fix it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.7.184.127 ( talk) 20:27, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
There is a reference to Will Ferrel in the first few lines of this article. Unless someone can prove his involvement I believe it should be removed from the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.38.251.22 ( talk) 20:47, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
There is a alot of vandalism in this article, someone care to fix it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.7.184.127 ( talk • contribs) 20:29, 14 February 2010
The map referred shows the state of Jammu & Kashmir as part of Pakistan. The map be removed/edited. Pyu.agrawal ( talk) 16:25, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Here we have a whole article dedicated to just 10 deaths, but for the terrorist attacks against Pakistanis, we have just a single line for typically 5 to 25 victims per attack. Sorry for using bold, but the lack of neutrality is appalling. As for the difference between state terrorism and non-state terrorism and apparent moral justifications, IMHO that should be neutral or at least NPOV too. See the article on state terrorism if you haven't read it before.
i'm not blaming anybody - this is related to the known problem of systemic bias in the English-language Wikipedia. The numbers of people willing to edit individual pages for each of the drone attacks and to find "reliable sources" are much smaller than the numbers of people willing to edit a page on this one single attack. This problem also includes the subjective concept of "notability". In US/Western Europe and for the best-internet-connected fluent-in-English people in Indian cities, the Pune attack is clearly "notable", but individual drone attacks in Pakistan are not as notable because they did not get as much publicity, and did not kill any US/European citizens, and probably did not kill any young, urban, internet-connected, fluent-in-English Indians.
However, if anybody working on this page is interested in helping to overcome these biases, please go ahead. Probably a practical way to start is to start some individual articles on some of the recent drone attacks. There should be enough Pakistani newspapers online, and some others (e.g. South Asian) that consider Pakistani drone attacks to be as "notable" as suspected-LeT-IM attacks in India. It does seem to me that several of the drone attacks gain a lot of publicity. Moreover, the perpetrator (organisation) is usually known, with only an ambiguity between which US service is responsible for the state-terrorist attack - CIA or army or whatever. Boud ( talk) 13:28, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
I think this list should be sorted by name.
Why in the world are the 2 foreigners listed 1st?
-- vvarkey ( talk) 22:14, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
The nationality of Gokul Nepali in the victim list is actually not ascertained! http://www.nepalnews.com/main/index.php/news-archive/19-general/4168-four-nepalis-injured-in-pune-terror-attack-one-dead-suspected-to-be-nepali.html -- JovianEye ( talk) 07:26, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on 2010 Pune bombing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
TrangaBellam ( talk) 12:03, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
[l]ist the appeals [] for final disposal in the third week of July 2022. So, I assume that the appeal has been decided but the order-copy is not yet uploaded to the portal — maybe, Naushervan will have some ideas? TrangaBellam ( talk) 12:25, 28 January 2023 (UTC)