This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2008–09 NBA season article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
I replaced the inline standings with transclusions of the already-existing standings templates. I did this so the standings do not need to be updated in multiple places at the conclusion of a game. It looks a little bit different because the templates have a few more columns than what was inline. If people do not like the current layout, my suggestion is to remove some of the columns from the template (games played can go first, IMO). – X96lee15 ( talk) 18:42, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Team | W | L | PCT | GB | Div | Conf |
---|
– Howard the Duck 11:15, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Unindent: Currently, NBA.com uses the following format:
Team | W | L | PCT | GB | Conf | Div | Home | Road | L 10 | Streak |
---|
Yahoo Sports does it this way:
Team | W | L | PCT | GB | Home | Road | Div | Conf | Streak | L10 |
---|
I also ripped off Yahoo Sports' conference standings and applied to the previous season's article and I was pleasantly surprised to see it on this article until right before the playoffs start.
ESPN's regular version:
Team | W | L | PCT | GB | Home | Road | Conf | Div | PF | PA | Diff | Streak | L10 |
---|
Compare to the current convention:
Team | W | L | PCT | GB | Home | Road | Div | GB | GP |
---|
If you'd notice, GB always comes after PCT. Check out my proposed table above to see the differences and similarities. I proposed ditching home and away records since they don't matter in playoff seedings, unless the NBA proposes a rule similar to the Away goals rule in soccer. – Howard the Duck 16:16, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Team | W | L | T | PCT | PF | PA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
New England Patriots | 5 | 2 | 0 | .714 | 153 | 132 | Details |
Team | W | L | T | PCT | PF | PA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
New England Patriots | 5 | 2 | 0 | .714 | 153 | 132 |
I don't think nobody will object if I'll put PCT and GB together again, isn't it? – Howard the Duck 12:42, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Since the templates use colors to highlight the team on its own season article, I suggest we use the traditional method of labeling teans that qualified for the playoffs. Like this:
The (4) is optional. The letters used will mean:
– Howard the Duck 13:07, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
In the statistic leaders section, why do we need to have the turnover/personal fouls leaders? It just doesn't seem to go together with the rest of statistics in the section. If we are going to include these somewhat uncommon stats, will we also include the leader in technical fouls per game or minutes per game? Henry talk 00:42, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
I think it needs to be said that there is a definite glut of "notable" occurrences in this article. With everyone's blessing, I'm gonna try and trim that section's length down. Dknights411 ( talk) 05:21, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
How many games does each team get to play? 24.12.249.201 ( talk) 17:43, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
OK 24.12.249.201 ( talk) 03:00, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm thinking about turning the several first "notable" events, the trades on June 26th into a table.
Would this be suitable?
Teams Involved | Players Traded | ||
---|---|---|---|
Milwaukee Bucks / New Jersey Nets | Bobby Simmons, Yi Jianlian | for | Richard Jefferson |
Indiana Pacers / Portland Trail Blazers | Jerryd Bayless, Ike Diogu | for |
Brandon Rush,
Jarret Jack, Josh McRoberts |
Indiana Pacers / Toronto Raptors | Jermaine O'Neal, Natha Jawai | for |
T. J. Ford,
Rasho Nesterovič, Roy Hibbert, Maceo Baston. |
Memphis Grizzlies / Minnesota Timberwolves |
Kevin Love,
Mike Miller,
Brian Cardinal Jason Collins |
for |
O. J. Mayo,
Antoine Walker, Marko Jaric, Greg Buckner |
or this
Three-way Trades | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date | Team | Recieves | Team | Recieves | Team | Recieves |
August 13, 2008 | Cleveland Cavaliers | Mo Williams | Milwaukee Bucks | Damon Jones, Luke Ridnour, Adrian Griffin | Oklahoma City Thunder | Joe Smith, Desmond Mason |
December 10, 2008 | Washington Wizards | Mike James, Javaris Crittenton | New Orleans Hornets | Antonio Daniels, conditional second-round pick | Oklahoma City Thunder | conditional first-round pick |
February 19, 2009 | Orlando Magic | Rafer Alston | Houston Rockets | Kyle Lowry, Brian Cook | Memphis Grizzlies | Adonal Foyle, Mike Wilks, first-round pick from Orlando |
I'm just thinking about doing this for all the trades this year and creating a "Trades" section so the "notable occurences" section seems less inflated. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
SyogunAW (
talk •
contribs)
08:50, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Well, I'll just go ahead and do it. If it itself becomes distracting, turn into a separate page or have the option to hide/show it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SyogunAW ( talk • contribs) 08:51, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
User:Syjytg keeps changing the stat section into using five decimal numbers in each stat. This is excessive and it makes no difference as to the informativeness of the table. In fact, the stats are harder to read this way. It is a common policy to use one decimal for figures over 10, two decimals for under 10 and three for percentages. NBA.com uses this policy and unless the aforementioned user (or anyone else for that matter) manages to provide valid reasons for using five instead, we should stick to the one that is generally used. Antti29 ( talk) 15:18, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
How about adding the scores but in a tabular format? Since the NBA is doesn't have an equal strength of schedule, I suggest having an intradivision, intraconference and interconference tables. For example for the Southeast Division:
Intradivision | ATL | CHA | MIA | ORL | WSH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atlanta | – | 88–83 83–79 |
91–83 Apr 14 |
102–106 82–88 |
91–87 111–90 |
Charlotte | 97–102 98–91 |
– | 100–87 92–97 |
85–90 80–82 |
80–72 101–89 |
Miami | 73–87 95–79 |
100–96 96–92 |
– | 103–97 95–101 |
97–77 93–71 |
Orlando | 85–99 121–87 |
107–102* Apr 15 |
86–76 122–99 |
– | 106–81 89–80 |
Washington | 98–102 89–98 |
89–92 95–93 |
87–94 104–118 |
90–105 103–112 |
– |
Intraconference | BOS | CHI | CLE | DET | IND | MIL | NJ | NY | PHI | TOR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atlanta | ||||||||||
Charlotte | ||||||||||
Miami | ||||||||||
Orlando | ||||||||||
Washington |
Interconference matchups can be placed in one table:
Interconference | DAL | DEN | GS | HOU | LAC | LAL | MEM | MIN | NO | OKC | PHX | POR | SAC | SA | Utah |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atlanta | |||||||||||||||
Boston | |||||||||||||||
Charlotte | |||||||||||||||
Chicago | |||||||||||||||
Cleveland | |||||||||||||||
Detroit | |||||||||||||||
Indiana | |||||||||||||||
Miami | |||||||||||||||
Milwaukee | |||||||||||||||
New Jersey | |||||||||||||||
New York | |||||||||||||||
Orlando | |||||||||||||||
Philadelphia | |||||||||||||||
Toronto | |||||||||||||||
Washington |
– Howard the Duck 10:04, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Team | ATL | BOS | CHA | CHI | DAL | DEN | DET | GS | HOU | IND | LAC | LAL | MEM | MIA | MIL | MIN | NJ | NO | NY | OKC | ORL | PHI | PHX | POR | SAC | SA | TOR | Utah | WSH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atlanta | 0–4 | 3–1 | 3–0 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 3–0 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 3–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 3–1 | 3–1 | 2–0 | 1–3 | 2–0 | 1–2 | 2–0 | 1–3 | 1–2 | 0–2 | 1–1 | 2–0 | 0–2 | 3–1 | 1–1 | 4–0 | |
Boston | 4–0 | 2–1 | 2–1 | 2–0 | 1–1 | 3–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 3–1 | 1–1 | 0–2 | 2–0 | 3–1 | 2–1 | 2–0 | 4–0 | 2–0 | 3–1 | 2–0 | 2–2 | 4–0 | 2–0 | 1–1 | 2–0 | 1–1 | 4–0 | 1–1 | 3–0 | |
Charlotte | 1–3 | 1–2 | 2–1 | 0–2 | 0–2 | 1–3 | 1–1 | 0–2 | 2–2 | 2–0 | 2–0 | 2–0 | 1–3 | 1–3 | 1–1 | 1–2 | 1–1 | 2–2 | 1–1 | 0–4 | 3–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 2–0 | 0–2 | 2–2 | 1–1 | 3–1 |
Team | Eastern Conference | Western Conference | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATL | BOS | CHA | CHI | CLE | DET | IND | MIA | MIL | NJ | NY | ORL | PHI | TOR | WSH | DAL | DEN | GS | HOU | LAC | LAL | MEM | MIN | NO | OKC | PHX | POR | SAC | SA | Utah | |
Atlanta | 0–4 | 3–1 | 3–0 | 1–3 | 3–0 | 3–1 | 3–1 | 3–1 | 1–3 | 1–2 | 1–3 | 1–2 | 3–1 | 4–0 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 2–0 | 2–0 | 2–0 | 0–2 | 1–1 | 2–0 | 0–2 | 1–1 |
Reindent: This is how it'll look like:
Team | ATL | BOS | CHA | CHI | CLE | DET | IND | MIA | MIL | NJN | NYK | ORL | PHI | TOR | WAS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atlanta | 0–4 | 3–1 | 3–0 | 1–3 | 3–0 | 3–1 | 3–1 | 3–1 | 1–3 | 1–2 | 1–3 | 1–2 | 3–1 | 4–0 |
Team | DAL | DEN | GSW | HOU | LAC | LAL | MEM | MIN | NOH | OKC | PHX | POR | SAC | SAS | UTA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atlanta | 1–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 2–0 | 2–0 | 2–0 | 0–2 | 1–1 | 2–0 | 0–2 | 1–1 |
– Howard the Duck 12:00, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
How about adding a small section explaining how the tied teams were ordered? Especially that 3-way tie in the west for second place. I'm talking about displaying the season series among the tied teams, and not just repeating the tie-breaking rules. Juve2000 ( talk) 01:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
The Portland Trail Blazers share this title with The Denver Nuggets. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.237.87.149 ( talk) 03:57, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
I don't think Stephon Marbury signing with the Celtics and Shaun Livingston signing with the Heat (before he was waived and signed by the Thunder) are notable enough. There are plenty of free agency signing that resulted in the players who made more impacts than these two. 125.161.247.198 ( talk) 09:25, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Also if the 'Noche Latina' event was mentioned, I think NBA Green week need to be mentioned as well. 125.161.247.198 ( talk) 09:29, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
How about a separate section for records broken this season? There seems to be a lot and it takes up a good portion of the "Notable Events" category. I think the "readability" of the article would be better if large blocks of text were broken into smaller sections. You guys agreed with that when I took off the player transactions and coaching changes and gave them their own sections, but I want to make sure. Yea or nay? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.151.26.104 ( talk) 07:18, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Shouldn't there be something about team and league-wide attendance figures? -- Ttownfeen ( talk) 04:10, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 13 external links on 2008–09 NBA season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:22, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on 2008–09 NBA season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:36, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2008–09 NBA season article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
I replaced the inline standings with transclusions of the already-existing standings templates. I did this so the standings do not need to be updated in multiple places at the conclusion of a game. It looks a little bit different because the templates have a few more columns than what was inline. If people do not like the current layout, my suggestion is to remove some of the columns from the template (games played can go first, IMO). – X96lee15 ( talk) 18:42, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Team | W | L | PCT | GB | Div | Conf |
---|
– Howard the Duck 11:15, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Unindent: Currently, NBA.com uses the following format:
Team | W | L | PCT | GB | Conf | Div | Home | Road | L 10 | Streak |
---|
Yahoo Sports does it this way:
Team | W | L | PCT | GB | Home | Road | Div | Conf | Streak | L10 |
---|
I also ripped off Yahoo Sports' conference standings and applied to the previous season's article and I was pleasantly surprised to see it on this article until right before the playoffs start.
ESPN's regular version:
Team | W | L | PCT | GB | Home | Road | Conf | Div | PF | PA | Diff | Streak | L10 |
---|
Compare to the current convention:
Team | W | L | PCT | GB | Home | Road | Div | GB | GP |
---|
If you'd notice, GB always comes after PCT. Check out my proposed table above to see the differences and similarities. I proposed ditching home and away records since they don't matter in playoff seedings, unless the NBA proposes a rule similar to the Away goals rule in soccer. – Howard the Duck 16:16, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Team | W | L | T | PCT | PF | PA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
New England Patriots | 5 | 2 | 0 | .714 | 153 | 132 | Details |
Team | W | L | T | PCT | PF | PA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
New England Patriots | 5 | 2 | 0 | .714 | 153 | 132 |
I don't think nobody will object if I'll put PCT and GB together again, isn't it? – Howard the Duck 12:42, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Since the templates use colors to highlight the team on its own season article, I suggest we use the traditional method of labeling teans that qualified for the playoffs. Like this:
The (4) is optional. The letters used will mean:
– Howard the Duck 13:07, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
In the statistic leaders section, why do we need to have the turnover/personal fouls leaders? It just doesn't seem to go together with the rest of statistics in the section. If we are going to include these somewhat uncommon stats, will we also include the leader in technical fouls per game or minutes per game? Henry talk 00:42, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
I think it needs to be said that there is a definite glut of "notable" occurrences in this article. With everyone's blessing, I'm gonna try and trim that section's length down. Dknights411 ( talk) 05:21, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
How many games does each team get to play? 24.12.249.201 ( talk) 17:43, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
OK 24.12.249.201 ( talk) 03:00, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm thinking about turning the several first "notable" events, the trades on June 26th into a table.
Would this be suitable?
Teams Involved | Players Traded | ||
---|---|---|---|
Milwaukee Bucks / New Jersey Nets | Bobby Simmons, Yi Jianlian | for | Richard Jefferson |
Indiana Pacers / Portland Trail Blazers | Jerryd Bayless, Ike Diogu | for |
Brandon Rush,
Jarret Jack, Josh McRoberts |
Indiana Pacers / Toronto Raptors | Jermaine O'Neal, Natha Jawai | for |
T. J. Ford,
Rasho Nesterovič, Roy Hibbert, Maceo Baston. |
Memphis Grizzlies / Minnesota Timberwolves |
Kevin Love,
Mike Miller,
Brian Cardinal Jason Collins |
for |
O. J. Mayo,
Antoine Walker, Marko Jaric, Greg Buckner |
or this
Three-way Trades | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date | Team | Recieves | Team | Recieves | Team | Recieves |
August 13, 2008 | Cleveland Cavaliers | Mo Williams | Milwaukee Bucks | Damon Jones, Luke Ridnour, Adrian Griffin | Oklahoma City Thunder | Joe Smith, Desmond Mason |
December 10, 2008 | Washington Wizards | Mike James, Javaris Crittenton | New Orleans Hornets | Antonio Daniels, conditional second-round pick | Oklahoma City Thunder | conditional first-round pick |
February 19, 2009 | Orlando Magic | Rafer Alston | Houston Rockets | Kyle Lowry, Brian Cook | Memphis Grizzlies | Adonal Foyle, Mike Wilks, first-round pick from Orlando |
I'm just thinking about doing this for all the trades this year and creating a "Trades" section so the "notable occurences" section seems less inflated. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
SyogunAW (
talk •
contribs)
08:50, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Well, I'll just go ahead and do it. If it itself becomes distracting, turn into a separate page or have the option to hide/show it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SyogunAW ( talk • contribs) 08:51, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
User:Syjytg keeps changing the stat section into using five decimal numbers in each stat. This is excessive and it makes no difference as to the informativeness of the table. In fact, the stats are harder to read this way. It is a common policy to use one decimal for figures over 10, two decimals for under 10 and three for percentages. NBA.com uses this policy and unless the aforementioned user (or anyone else for that matter) manages to provide valid reasons for using five instead, we should stick to the one that is generally used. Antti29 ( talk) 15:18, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
How about adding the scores but in a tabular format? Since the NBA is doesn't have an equal strength of schedule, I suggest having an intradivision, intraconference and interconference tables. For example for the Southeast Division:
Intradivision | ATL | CHA | MIA | ORL | WSH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atlanta | – | 88–83 83–79 |
91–83 Apr 14 |
102–106 82–88 |
91–87 111–90 |
Charlotte | 97–102 98–91 |
– | 100–87 92–97 |
85–90 80–82 |
80–72 101–89 |
Miami | 73–87 95–79 |
100–96 96–92 |
– | 103–97 95–101 |
97–77 93–71 |
Orlando | 85–99 121–87 |
107–102* Apr 15 |
86–76 122–99 |
– | 106–81 89–80 |
Washington | 98–102 89–98 |
89–92 95–93 |
87–94 104–118 |
90–105 103–112 |
– |
Intraconference | BOS | CHI | CLE | DET | IND | MIL | NJ | NY | PHI | TOR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atlanta | ||||||||||
Charlotte | ||||||||||
Miami | ||||||||||
Orlando | ||||||||||
Washington |
Interconference matchups can be placed in one table:
Interconference | DAL | DEN | GS | HOU | LAC | LAL | MEM | MIN | NO | OKC | PHX | POR | SAC | SA | Utah |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atlanta | |||||||||||||||
Boston | |||||||||||||||
Charlotte | |||||||||||||||
Chicago | |||||||||||||||
Cleveland | |||||||||||||||
Detroit | |||||||||||||||
Indiana | |||||||||||||||
Miami | |||||||||||||||
Milwaukee | |||||||||||||||
New Jersey | |||||||||||||||
New York | |||||||||||||||
Orlando | |||||||||||||||
Philadelphia | |||||||||||||||
Toronto | |||||||||||||||
Washington |
– Howard the Duck 10:04, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Team | ATL | BOS | CHA | CHI | DAL | DEN | DET | GS | HOU | IND | LAC | LAL | MEM | MIA | MIL | MIN | NJ | NO | NY | OKC | ORL | PHI | PHX | POR | SAC | SA | TOR | Utah | WSH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atlanta | 0–4 | 3–1 | 3–0 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 3–0 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 3–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 3–1 | 3–1 | 2–0 | 1–3 | 2–0 | 1–2 | 2–0 | 1–3 | 1–2 | 0–2 | 1–1 | 2–0 | 0–2 | 3–1 | 1–1 | 4–0 | |
Boston | 4–0 | 2–1 | 2–1 | 2–0 | 1–1 | 3–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 3–1 | 1–1 | 0–2 | 2–0 | 3–1 | 2–1 | 2–0 | 4–0 | 2–0 | 3–1 | 2–0 | 2–2 | 4–0 | 2–0 | 1–1 | 2–0 | 1–1 | 4–0 | 1–1 | 3–0 | |
Charlotte | 1–3 | 1–2 | 2–1 | 0–2 | 0–2 | 1–3 | 1–1 | 0–2 | 2–2 | 2–0 | 2–0 | 2–0 | 1–3 | 1–3 | 1–1 | 1–2 | 1–1 | 2–2 | 1–1 | 0–4 | 3–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 2–0 | 0–2 | 2–2 | 1–1 | 3–1 |
Team | Eastern Conference | Western Conference | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATL | BOS | CHA | CHI | CLE | DET | IND | MIA | MIL | NJ | NY | ORL | PHI | TOR | WSH | DAL | DEN | GS | HOU | LAC | LAL | MEM | MIN | NO | OKC | PHX | POR | SAC | SA | Utah | |
Atlanta | 0–4 | 3–1 | 3–0 | 1–3 | 3–0 | 3–1 | 3–1 | 3–1 | 1–3 | 1–2 | 1–3 | 1–2 | 3–1 | 4–0 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 2–0 | 2–0 | 2–0 | 0–2 | 1–1 | 2–0 | 0–2 | 1–1 |
Reindent: This is how it'll look like:
Team | ATL | BOS | CHA | CHI | CLE | DET | IND | MIA | MIL | NJN | NYK | ORL | PHI | TOR | WAS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atlanta | 0–4 | 3–1 | 3–0 | 1–3 | 3–0 | 3–1 | 3–1 | 3–1 | 1–3 | 1–2 | 1–3 | 1–2 | 3–1 | 4–0 |
Team | DAL | DEN | GSW | HOU | LAC | LAL | MEM | MIN | NOH | OKC | PHX | POR | SAC | SAS | UTA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atlanta | 1–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 | 2–0 | 2–0 | 2–0 | 0–2 | 1–1 | 2–0 | 0–2 | 1–1 |
– Howard the Duck 12:00, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
How about adding a small section explaining how the tied teams were ordered? Especially that 3-way tie in the west for second place. I'm talking about displaying the season series among the tied teams, and not just repeating the tie-breaking rules. Juve2000 ( talk) 01:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
The Portland Trail Blazers share this title with The Denver Nuggets. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.237.87.149 ( talk) 03:57, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
I don't think Stephon Marbury signing with the Celtics and Shaun Livingston signing with the Heat (before he was waived and signed by the Thunder) are notable enough. There are plenty of free agency signing that resulted in the players who made more impacts than these two. 125.161.247.198 ( talk) 09:25, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Also if the 'Noche Latina' event was mentioned, I think NBA Green week need to be mentioned as well. 125.161.247.198 ( talk) 09:29, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
How about a separate section for records broken this season? There seems to be a lot and it takes up a good portion of the "Notable Events" category. I think the "readability" of the article would be better if large blocks of text were broken into smaller sections. You guys agreed with that when I took off the player transactions and coaching changes and gave them their own sections, but I want to make sure. Yea or nay? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.151.26.104 ( talk) 07:18, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Shouldn't there be something about team and league-wide attendance figures? -- Ttownfeen ( talk) 04:10, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 13 external links on 2008–09 NBA season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:22, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on 2008–09 NBA season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:36, 4 September 2017 (UTC)