![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on December 18, 2011. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
From my Point of view, it is a big disaster for Malaysia and Indonesia , so it should not be merged because both of the event have different situation eventhough in the same time and cause by same things. The relief works are different within these two countries. So to make a link from a page as an example from " Flood cause by Typhoon Utor in 2006" is advisable. User:Senyuman12.23a.m GMT +8, 14 Jan 07
Do not copy and paste news report. __earth ( Talk) 07:08, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm surprised to see that the floods in nearby North Sumatra are not even mentioned in this article. Compared to the six dead in Malaysia, the 105 dead and several hundred missing in Sumatra are much more noteable [1]. I suggest that the article is rewritten so that the Sumatra floods become its main subject and the Malaysian side-effects are treated as such. Preslav 16:21, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
I disagree on the renaming. It would be better to have two separate pages that mention each other. Or, if we are to merge it, perhaps a page with the effect of Effect of Typhoon Utor on Southeast Asia is more suitable. __earth ( Talk) 03:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Given that this is main page linked, I felt that we need to update it to include Indonesia. I've begun to add Indonesia but someone needs to continue. Also, could a brave sole or an admin move it to 2006 Typhoon Utor associated floods or whatever you think is appropriate. Ideally we should discuss this first but I think we should move it to a more neutral name first given that it's not just covering the Malaysian floods. I was planning to do this myself but I decided moving a mainpage linked article might be more reckless then bold. Nil Einne 19:36, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
There have been reports of politicization of the flood; this includes but not limited to the "wrath of god" theory, poor storm water and river management. Should these be in the article? -- 124.82.8.195 13:51, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:52, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:53, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on 2006–07 Southeast Asian floods. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:59, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on December 18, 2011. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
From my Point of view, it is a big disaster for Malaysia and Indonesia , so it should not be merged because both of the event have different situation eventhough in the same time and cause by same things. The relief works are different within these two countries. So to make a link from a page as an example from " Flood cause by Typhoon Utor in 2006" is advisable. User:Senyuman12.23a.m GMT +8, 14 Jan 07
Do not copy and paste news report. __earth ( Talk) 07:08, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm surprised to see that the floods in nearby North Sumatra are not even mentioned in this article. Compared to the six dead in Malaysia, the 105 dead and several hundred missing in Sumatra are much more noteable [1]. I suggest that the article is rewritten so that the Sumatra floods become its main subject and the Malaysian side-effects are treated as such. Preslav 16:21, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
I disagree on the renaming. It would be better to have two separate pages that mention each other. Or, if we are to merge it, perhaps a page with the effect of Effect of Typhoon Utor on Southeast Asia is more suitable. __earth ( Talk) 03:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Given that this is main page linked, I felt that we need to update it to include Indonesia. I've begun to add Indonesia but someone needs to continue. Also, could a brave sole or an admin move it to 2006 Typhoon Utor associated floods or whatever you think is appropriate. Ideally we should discuss this first but I think we should move it to a more neutral name first given that it's not just covering the Malaysian floods. I was planning to do this myself but I decided moving a mainpage linked article might be more reckless then bold. Nil Einne 19:36, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
There have been reports of politicization of the flood; this includes but not limited to the "wrath of god" theory, poor storm water and river management. Should these be in the article? -- 124.82.8.195 13:51, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:52, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:53, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on 2006–07 Southeast Asian floods. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:59, 17 June 2017 (UTC)