This
level-5 vital article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives ( Index) |
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
Unfortunately, the " Columbine massacre" is not that unusual in the US any more. Possibly this one is notable in the 1990s, but I would argue against further school shootings being notable in year or decade articles.
In any case, it's not a terrorist act. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:15, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 05:26, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 00:22, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
@ MaesterTonberry:: I just realised the collage for 1990s has no image for the handover of Hong Kong, which was a big deal. It should perhaps replace either Hubble Telescope or Princess Diana. Ythlev ( talk) 10:54, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The collage image is perfectly fine. Leaf8613 ( talk) 22:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
I agree with Ythlev - I remember the handover of Hong Kong, even though I'm european and was a child at that time. Can't be compared to the funeral, which, after all, was a media event about a celebrity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:1110:118:A377:15E1:DBE0:6326:5D9C ( talk) 23:50, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
What do we think about swapping the picture of the cloned Dolly the Sheep with this image of Michael Jordan in the lead montage? It has been since the 1920s article (with Babe Ruth) that an athlete was included in the lead montage and Jordan certainly could be the first since Ruth where an athlete had such a profound impact on a sport throughout a decade. Note also that the same Dolly the Sheep image is still included in the body of the article with the same caption it currently has in the montage. Caption for new MJ photo could be something like: " Michael Jordan becomes the most famous basketball player of the era." No formatting changes to the montage would be needed. ~ Flyedit32 ( talk) 13:26, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Perhaps this is not as important to others on here, but I just can't help but keep coming back to Babe Ruth being included in the 1920s montage. Then why not Jordan in the 1990s montage? To many, Jordan was even more globally relevant than Ruth in their respective eras, and defined his decade in the world of sports even more so than Ruth defined his (although not by much) -- many call Jordan the greatest basketball player of all time and one of (if not thee) greatest athlete of all time as well. So shouldn't he be included in the montage then? Thanks for contributing. ~ Flyedit32 ( talk) 09:51, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 10:06, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 18:06, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Is it just me or is this whole page filled with bias? Some of the things are wrong here and the 90s had a lot of bad events that defined the decade but for some reason isn’t here. ExoticPride ( talk) 15:23, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 23:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 04:38, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
'Many high developed countries were economically prosperous in the 1990s'
That's a wrong statement. It was mostly just the United States. Europe and Asia were struggling. Melotrance ( talk) 11:24, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
It was big deal back then I suppose. Sertyt ( talk) 11:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
It appears an RFC on collages on Wikiproject years will be interpreted to also ban collages in decade articles. Users here may wish to participate. Koopinator ( talk) 07:17, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
How come the wikipedia article for the 1990s says the 1990s ended on December 31, 1999, despite 20th century stating the century as having ended on December 31, 2000, and 2nd millennium stating the millennium ended on December 31, 2000? 24.115.255.37 ( talk) 15:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
It's all about sex in the early 90's. 71.247.208.187 ( talk) 14:49, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
This
level-5 vital article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives ( Index) |
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
Unfortunately, the " Columbine massacre" is not that unusual in the US any more. Possibly this one is notable in the 1990s, but I would argue against further school shootings being notable in year or decade articles.
In any case, it's not a terrorist act. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:15, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 05:26, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 00:22, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
@ MaesterTonberry:: I just realised the collage for 1990s has no image for the handover of Hong Kong, which was a big deal. It should perhaps replace either Hubble Telescope or Princess Diana. Ythlev ( talk) 10:54, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The collage image is perfectly fine. Leaf8613 ( talk) 22:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
I agree with Ythlev - I remember the handover of Hong Kong, even though I'm european and was a child at that time. Can't be compared to the funeral, which, after all, was a media event about a celebrity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:1110:118:A377:15E1:DBE0:6326:5D9C ( talk) 23:50, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
What do we think about swapping the picture of the cloned Dolly the Sheep with this image of Michael Jordan in the lead montage? It has been since the 1920s article (with Babe Ruth) that an athlete was included in the lead montage and Jordan certainly could be the first since Ruth where an athlete had such a profound impact on a sport throughout a decade. Note also that the same Dolly the Sheep image is still included in the body of the article with the same caption it currently has in the montage. Caption for new MJ photo could be something like: " Michael Jordan becomes the most famous basketball player of the era." No formatting changes to the montage would be needed. ~ Flyedit32 ( talk) 13:26, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Perhaps this is not as important to others on here, but I just can't help but keep coming back to Babe Ruth being included in the 1920s montage. Then why not Jordan in the 1990s montage? To many, Jordan was even more globally relevant than Ruth in their respective eras, and defined his decade in the world of sports even more so than Ruth defined his (although not by much) -- many call Jordan the greatest basketball player of all time and one of (if not thee) greatest athlete of all time as well. So shouldn't he be included in the montage then? Thanks for contributing. ~ Flyedit32 ( talk) 09:51, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 10:06, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 18:06, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Is it just me or is this whole page filled with bias? Some of the things are wrong here and the 90s had a lot of bad events that defined the decade but for some reason isn’t here. ExoticPride ( talk) 15:23, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 23:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 04:38, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
'Many high developed countries were economically prosperous in the 1990s'
That's a wrong statement. It was mostly just the United States. Europe and Asia were struggling. Melotrance ( talk) 11:24, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
It was big deal back then I suppose. Sertyt ( talk) 11:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
It appears an RFC on collages on Wikiproject years will be interpreted to also ban collages in decade articles. Users here may wish to participate. Koopinator ( talk) 07:17, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
How come the wikipedia article for the 1990s says the 1990s ended on December 31, 1999, despite 20th century stating the century as having ended on December 31, 2000, and 2nd millennium stating the millennium ended on December 31, 2000? 24.115.255.37 ( talk) 15:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
It's all about sex in the early 90's. 71.247.208.187 ( talk) 14:49, 29 February 2024 (UTC)