1961 Indonesian census has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 3, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from 1961 Indonesian census appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 9 January 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk) 01:18, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Created by Arsonal ( talk). Self-nominated at 05:28, 17 December 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: @ Arsonal: Good article. Will have to AGF on the Indonesian sources. Onegreatjoke ( talk) 16:27, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 07:37, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Llywrch ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
I apologize again for the irresponsible delay in completing this. Having a family & a full-time job tends to encourage me from promptly completing tasks on Wikipedia.
First off, to repeat what I said above this is a strong article that covers most aspects of the subject. In fact, after my first read I felt this should be used as a model for future articles on national censuses. (Of course someone will eventually write a better one that will reach FA status, but not only is that inevitable, it will require a lot more work than was put into this article.) I appreciate that you provided background to this census; not only are many readers unaware of the motivations & efforts required to undertake a national census in non-Western countries, but covering that enlivens an otherwise dull topic.
I do have a couple of thoughts, none critical to rating this article, but I felt I should share them.
to make sure numbers are not separated from the relevant value, such as 31 October.Now for some further suggestions if you want to turn this into an FA:
So I'll wait for your responses to these thoughts, before taking further action. -- llywrch ( talk) 23:20, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
1961 Indonesian census has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 3, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from 1961 Indonesian census appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 9 January 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk) 01:18, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Created by Arsonal ( talk). Self-nominated at 05:28, 17 December 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: @ Arsonal: Good article. Will have to AGF on the Indonesian sources. Onegreatjoke ( talk) 16:27, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 07:37, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Llywrch ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
I apologize again for the irresponsible delay in completing this. Having a family & a full-time job tends to encourage me from promptly completing tasks on Wikipedia.
First off, to repeat what I said above this is a strong article that covers most aspects of the subject. In fact, after my first read I felt this should be used as a model for future articles on national censuses. (Of course someone will eventually write a better one that will reach FA status, but not only is that inevitable, it will require a lot more work than was put into this article.) I appreciate that you provided background to this census; not only are many readers unaware of the motivations & efforts required to undertake a national census in non-Western countries, but covering that enlivens an otherwise dull topic.
I do have a couple of thoughts, none critical to rating this article, but I felt I should share them.
to make sure numbers are not separated from the relevant value, such as 31 October.Now for some further suggestions if you want to turn this into an FA:
So I'll wait for your responses to these thoughts, before taking further action. -- llywrch ( talk) 23:20, 25 April 2023 (UTC)