![]() | 1947 Fort Lauderdale hurricane received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
From Hurricane Andrew
But from 1947 Fort Lauderdale Hurricane
Was this an oversight, or is there some error? -- zandperl 05:18, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
What about hurricane Cleo (1964) which had a eye crossing Ft. Lauderdale? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.48.206.189 ( talk) 21:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Category 3? That's not what the best track says. -- § Hurricane E RIC § archive 01:19, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to reorganize this to use the Storm history/Impact format that has become popular (the article basically pre-dates this format, which is now used for almost all storms). Jdorje 20:23, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
The most heavily-used citation on this page ( http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/easyhurdat_5106.html ) is a dead link. It's mainly cited for track information, but also cites that source in claiming that it's one of five storms to hit the US at 155 MPH or higher. I know the other three (1935, Camille, and Andrew) but I'd love to see what the fifth one is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.183.150.149 ( talk) 14:00, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Even though HURDAT doesn't carry this name, there are two online references which acknowledge that this system was named George: The Louisiana Hurricane History and Bryan Norcross' Hurricane Almanac. There's even an AWS document naming the system George, which in this case would be the primary reference. Shall we name it George, or wait for the hurricane re-analysis to do so in HURDAT within the next several years? Thegreatdr ( talk) 14:49, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 16:42, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 16:43, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
1947 Fort Lauderdale hurricane. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the
|checked=
to true
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 03:19, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on 1947 Fort Lauderdale hurricane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:58, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
![]() | 1947 Fort Lauderdale hurricane received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
From Hurricane Andrew
But from 1947 Fort Lauderdale Hurricane
Was this an oversight, or is there some error? -- zandperl 05:18, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
What about hurricane Cleo (1964) which had a eye crossing Ft. Lauderdale? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.48.206.189 ( talk) 21:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Category 3? That's not what the best track says. -- § Hurricane E RIC § archive 01:19, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to reorganize this to use the Storm history/Impact format that has become popular (the article basically pre-dates this format, which is now used for almost all storms). Jdorje 20:23, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
The most heavily-used citation on this page ( http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/easyhurdat_5106.html ) is a dead link. It's mainly cited for track information, but also cites that source in claiming that it's one of five storms to hit the US at 155 MPH or higher. I know the other three (1935, Camille, and Andrew) but I'd love to see what the fifth one is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.183.150.149 ( talk) 14:00, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Even though HURDAT doesn't carry this name, there are two online references which acknowledge that this system was named George: The Louisiana Hurricane History and Bryan Norcross' Hurricane Almanac. There's even an AWS document naming the system George, which in this case would be the primary reference. Shall we name it George, or wait for the hurricane re-analysis to do so in HURDAT within the next several years? Thegreatdr ( talk) 14:49, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 16:42, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 16:43, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
1947 Fort Lauderdale hurricane. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the
|checked=
to true
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 03:19, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on 1947 Fort Lauderdale hurricane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:58, 13 September 2016 (UTC)