This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
1933 NFL Championship Game article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from 1933 NFL Championship Game appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 17 December 2010 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 3 May 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to 1933 NFL championship game. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1933 NFL Championship Game. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:06, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
The following revision from 2016 appears to have mangled two paragraphs in the game discussion, resulting in a nonsense sentence.
Revision: (cur | prev) 00:22, 4 January 2016 2601:602:c102:31f0:b8e8:af8b:215:9b11 (talk) . . (11,254 bytes) (-1,021) . . (undo)
Nonsense sentence: "New York responded with a drive in which a 30 yard run ball to Newman who then passed it back to Strong for a touchdown. "
Diff the 4 Jan 2016 edit against the previous revision, and you see a much better description of the game action. I suggest reverting the edit in question, which does not appear to provide any value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.26.5.48 ( talk) 05:15, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:ACC Championship Game which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 23:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
This discussion was listed at Wikipedia:Move review on 15 May 2024. The result of the move review was endorsed. |
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Sceptre ( talk) 20:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Edit: As per a request on my talk page, I'll share the reasoning for closing this the way I did:
“ | @ Gonzo fan2007: et al had the correct interpretation of MOS:SPORTSCAPS. The pre-Super Bowl championship games (and the conference championships, for that matter) are more often capitalised than not, especially as they're trademarked. Sceptre ( talk) 23:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC) | ” |
Thanks, Sceptre ( talk) 15:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
– NFL championship game is not a proper name, quite often lowercase in sources. Dicklyon ( talk) 05:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Some data – Books n-grams show less than half capitalization, not the "consistently capitalized" that MOS:CAPS specifies. Dicklyon ( talk) 05:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Specific competition titles and events (or series thereof) are capitalized if they are usually capitalized in independent sources. Note the difference between this wording and the
consistently capitalized in a substantial majority of independent, reliable sources(emphasis from source) wording quoted in the nomination.
...usually capitalizedseems to be a lower bar to clear than the nominator's rationale. Withholding my opinion for now to hear the discussion from my Wikipedia colleagues. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 19:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
1933 NFL Championship Game article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from 1933 NFL Championship Game appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 17 December 2010 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 3 May 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to 1933 NFL championship game. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1933 NFL Championship Game. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:06, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
The following revision from 2016 appears to have mangled two paragraphs in the game discussion, resulting in a nonsense sentence.
Revision: (cur | prev) 00:22, 4 January 2016 2601:602:c102:31f0:b8e8:af8b:215:9b11 (talk) . . (11,254 bytes) (-1,021) . . (undo)
Nonsense sentence: "New York responded with a drive in which a 30 yard run ball to Newman who then passed it back to Strong for a touchdown. "
Diff the 4 Jan 2016 edit against the previous revision, and you see a much better description of the game action. I suggest reverting the edit in question, which does not appear to provide any value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.26.5.48 ( talk) 05:15, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:ACC Championship Game which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 23:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
This discussion was listed at Wikipedia:Move review on 15 May 2024. The result of the move review was endorsed. |
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Sceptre ( talk) 20:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Edit: As per a request on my talk page, I'll share the reasoning for closing this the way I did:
“ | @ Gonzo fan2007: et al had the correct interpretation of MOS:SPORTSCAPS. The pre-Super Bowl championship games (and the conference championships, for that matter) are more often capitalised than not, especially as they're trademarked. Sceptre ( talk) 23:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC) | ” |
Thanks, Sceptre ( talk) 15:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
– NFL championship game is not a proper name, quite often lowercase in sources. Dicklyon ( talk) 05:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Some data – Books n-grams show less than half capitalization, not the "consistently capitalized" that MOS:CAPS specifies. Dicklyon ( talk) 05:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Specific competition titles and events (or series thereof) are capitalized if they are usually capitalized in independent sources. Note the difference between this wording and the
consistently capitalized in a substantial majority of independent, reliable sources(emphasis from source) wording quoted in the nomination.
...usually capitalizedseems to be a lower bar to clear than the nominator's rationale. Withholding my opinion for now to hear the discussion from my Wikipedia colleagues. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 19:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)