190th Street station has been listed as one of the
Engineering and technology good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 20, 2019. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from 190th Street station appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 21 February 2019 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Yes, I believe it's important to note if a subway station is accessible or not whenever there is an elevator. But I don't think it is relevant to the station to point out where the nearest accessible station is. That is more of a transit guide issue (see WP:NOT a travel guide). If someone needs to find the nearest accessible station, the user would be better off looking at the service article (in this case, the A (New York City Subway service)). Clark Street (IRT Broadway-Seventh Avenue Line) is almost the same situation–an elevator takes passengers from street level to the mezzanine, but there is no elevator to the platform. But that article doesn't say where the next ADA accessible station is. Tinlinkin 18:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:163rd Street–Amsterdam Avenue (IND Eighth Avenue Line) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 18:02, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 190th Street (IND Eighth Avenue Line). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:14, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
I'm looking at doing a GA review of this article. There are some potential flaws that should probably be corrected before I start:
by comparison, Hudson Yards station is 110 feet deepor something similar.
@ Pi.1415926535: I turned it into a note.-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 00:29, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Done
|subscription=yes
in the citation template.Done
Done
Once these are fixed (or justified), I can probably do a pretty speedy GA review. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 23:52, 5 April 2018 (UTC) @ Pi.1415926535: Most, if not all, of these issues have been resolved. @ Pi.1415926535: The above ping by Kew Gardens 613 didn't work. epicgenius ( talk) 15:08, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
@ Pi.1415926535: Will you do a review? Thanks.-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 00:13, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Mgasparin ( talk · contribs) 08:16, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
All claims and facts are backed up with references and no original research appears to be present.
3. Is it broad in its coverage?
This article gives the reader a very balanced mix of generality and detail such that it would be useful to anyone.
4. Is it neutral?
5. Is it stable? No edit wars, etc:
6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
Plenty of pictures, perhaps even too many. I would consider removing some images from the article, although this is not mandatory.
Overall, this article is very well written and is very informative about the history, layout, constuction, etc., of this NYC subway station. It provides numerous images and cites all sources of factual information. I pass this article on these grounds. Mgasparin ( talk) 08:16, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
190th Street station has been listed as one of the
Engineering and technology good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 20, 2019. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from 190th Street station appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 21 February 2019 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Yes, I believe it's important to note if a subway station is accessible or not whenever there is an elevator. But I don't think it is relevant to the station to point out where the nearest accessible station is. That is more of a transit guide issue (see WP:NOT a travel guide). If someone needs to find the nearest accessible station, the user would be better off looking at the service article (in this case, the A (New York City Subway service)). Clark Street (IRT Broadway-Seventh Avenue Line) is almost the same situation–an elevator takes passengers from street level to the mezzanine, but there is no elevator to the platform. But that article doesn't say where the next ADA accessible station is. Tinlinkin 18:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:163rd Street–Amsterdam Avenue (IND Eighth Avenue Line) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 18:02, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 190th Street (IND Eighth Avenue Line). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:14, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
I'm looking at doing a GA review of this article. There are some potential flaws that should probably be corrected before I start:
by comparison, Hudson Yards station is 110 feet deepor something similar.
@ Pi.1415926535: I turned it into a note.-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 00:29, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Done
|subscription=yes
in the citation template.Done
Done
Once these are fixed (or justified), I can probably do a pretty speedy GA review. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 23:52, 5 April 2018 (UTC) @ Pi.1415926535: Most, if not all, of these issues have been resolved. @ Pi.1415926535: The above ping by Kew Gardens 613 didn't work. epicgenius ( talk) 15:08, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
@ Pi.1415926535: Will you do a review? Thanks.-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 00:13, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Mgasparin ( talk · contribs) 08:16, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
All claims and facts are backed up with references and no original research appears to be present.
3. Is it broad in its coverage?
This article gives the reader a very balanced mix of generality and detail such that it would be useful to anyone.
4. Is it neutral?
5. Is it stable? No edit wars, etc:
6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
Plenty of pictures, perhaps even too many. I would consider removing some images from the article, although this is not mandatory.
Overall, this article is very well written and is very informative about the history, layout, constuction, etc., of this NYC subway station. It provides numerous images and cites all sources of factual information. I pass this article on these grounds. Mgasparin ( talk) 08:16, 20 January 2019 (UTC)