![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I cannot see a section of "important personalities" on other decades and don't think that is the best description of Freud. Is there anyway of getting standard headings for the decades? BozMo (talk)
The only references I find to Lawrence Hargrave indicate that his work took place in the 1880s and 1890s. This appears to be the only reference to this "stable wing" design in the 1990s. Can someone please confirm or remove this entry? - Harmil 28 June 2005 11:40 (UTC)
I was thinking, since the 1910's-2000's(the rest of the 20th century, plus some of the 21st) each have their own descriptions, maybe this should have one as well. Thanks for the time. -Chris, Nov. 28 2005 6:03pm
How did people refer to the 1900s in the 1900s, does anybody know? -- Bungopolis 07:48, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Maybe they called it the 1900s? -- Anomynous 19:28, 25 November 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.199.18.136 ( talk)
I would like to know myself. Was it really the aughts? What about 1800-1810, would that be the eighteen aughts, similar to the eighteen twenties? Are we in the two-thousand aughts or the two-thousand zeros? Does anyone know? GalaxyMage@aol.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.142.21.43 ( talk) 09:33, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Since when was the 20th Century as a whole ever referred to as the 1900s? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.171.163.185 ( talk) 13:32, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
I tried to fix it up as much as I could. In my opinion, the Technology section might still need to be shortened a bit. TheCuriousGnome ( talk) 18:33, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
We need to reach a consensus on the final selection of images included in the 1900s montage on the top of the page through a discussion (and not through edit wars) which would include (hopefully) many Wikipedians.
The current montage is composed of the following images:
Please share your opinion on this matter BELOW supplying reasons for or against the current images included and/or supply alternative suggestions. TheCuriousGnome ( talk) 20:03, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:34, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:34, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:34, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:35, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:35, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:35, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
1st January 1901 to 31st December 1910 is the first decade of the 20th century. The 1900s presumably include 1900, even though it is in the 19th century? -- most confusing!! Rwood128 ( talk) 11:29, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
I have referred this to WP:RY Rwood128 ( talk) 11:21, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
This page shows that Bulgaria declared it's independence on October 5, 1908, as does "The Twentieth Century: An Almanac". However, the Bulgaria page in Wikipedia shows September 22, 1908 as the date Bulgaria declared independence. Does anyone have the correct, verifiable date? Or is there something different that happened on both dates regarding Bulgarian independence? Jtyroler ( talk) 19:43, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
1900s (decade). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 15:47, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
A new article titled "Aughts" could be created using pieces of 1900s (decade) and 2000s (decade), which I've cobbled together a candidate for at User:RobLa/sandbox/Aughts. "Aughts" is one possible general term for the first decade of every century (e.g. 1800s (decade), 1700s (decade), etc). The naming problem is a topic that has gathered mainstream attention through the years (as noted in the citations for User:RobLa/sandbox/Aughts), and the redirect currently at the top of this article is a bit confusing to navigate. Any problem with renaming User:RobLa/sandbox/Aughts to Aughts? -- RobLa ( talk) 15:28, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on 1900s (decade). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:41, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
I find many of the decade montages ignorant of much of the world. I would recommend adding an image of Atrocities in the Congo Free State for three reasons: It was a horrible and noteworthy period in itself, it brings representation to Africa, and it brings representation to western colonialism. I think this is more significant to humanity than the assassination of William McKinley or the San Francisco earthquake, so maybe it could replace one of them? 05:30, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Silikonz 💬 20:30, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
– Per Wikinav, 72.6% of people who go to the 1900s article click through to 1900s (decade). Only 27.2% click through to 20th century. For the latter group, we could just put a hatnote redirecting people to 20th century. Koopinator ( talk) 13:58, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
The 1900s" usually denotes a century long period, starting with the year 1900 and ending with 1999. The "19 - Aughts" is far more specific to a decade. 2603:6011:A400:259:E072:4AB0:8E6C:CD23 ( talk) 23:51, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
It appears an RFC on collages on Wikiproject years will be interpreted to also ban collages in decade articles. Users here may wish to participate. Koopinator ( talk) 07:35, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I cannot see a section of "important personalities" on other decades and don't think that is the best description of Freud. Is there anyway of getting standard headings for the decades? BozMo (talk)
The only references I find to Lawrence Hargrave indicate that his work took place in the 1880s and 1890s. This appears to be the only reference to this "stable wing" design in the 1990s. Can someone please confirm or remove this entry? - Harmil 28 June 2005 11:40 (UTC)
I was thinking, since the 1910's-2000's(the rest of the 20th century, plus some of the 21st) each have their own descriptions, maybe this should have one as well. Thanks for the time. -Chris, Nov. 28 2005 6:03pm
How did people refer to the 1900s in the 1900s, does anybody know? -- Bungopolis 07:48, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Maybe they called it the 1900s? -- Anomynous 19:28, 25 November 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.199.18.136 ( talk)
I would like to know myself. Was it really the aughts? What about 1800-1810, would that be the eighteen aughts, similar to the eighteen twenties? Are we in the two-thousand aughts or the two-thousand zeros? Does anyone know? GalaxyMage@aol.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.142.21.43 ( talk) 09:33, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Since when was the 20th Century as a whole ever referred to as the 1900s? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.171.163.185 ( talk) 13:32, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
I tried to fix it up as much as I could. In my opinion, the Technology section might still need to be shortened a bit. TheCuriousGnome ( talk) 18:33, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
We need to reach a consensus on the final selection of images included in the 1900s montage on the top of the page through a discussion (and not through edit wars) which would include (hopefully) many Wikipedians.
The current montage is composed of the following images:
Please share your opinion on this matter BELOW supplying reasons for or against the current images included and/or supply alternative suggestions. TheCuriousGnome ( talk) 20:03, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:34, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:34, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:34, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:35, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:35, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:35, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
1st January 1901 to 31st December 1910 is the first decade of the 20th century. The 1900s presumably include 1900, even though it is in the 19th century? -- most confusing!! Rwood128 ( talk) 11:29, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
I have referred this to WP:RY Rwood128 ( talk) 11:21, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
This page shows that Bulgaria declared it's independence on October 5, 1908, as does "The Twentieth Century: An Almanac". However, the Bulgaria page in Wikipedia shows September 22, 1908 as the date Bulgaria declared independence. Does anyone have the correct, verifiable date? Or is there something different that happened on both dates regarding Bulgarian independence? Jtyroler ( talk) 19:43, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
1900s (decade). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 15:47, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
A new article titled "Aughts" could be created using pieces of 1900s (decade) and 2000s (decade), which I've cobbled together a candidate for at User:RobLa/sandbox/Aughts. "Aughts" is one possible general term for the first decade of every century (e.g. 1800s (decade), 1700s (decade), etc). The naming problem is a topic that has gathered mainstream attention through the years (as noted in the citations for User:RobLa/sandbox/Aughts), and the redirect currently at the top of this article is a bit confusing to navigate. Any problem with renaming User:RobLa/sandbox/Aughts to Aughts? -- RobLa ( talk) 15:28, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on 1900s (decade). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:41, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
I find many of the decade montages ignorant of much of the world. I would recommend adding an image of Atrocities in the Congo Free State for three reasons: It was a horrible and noteworthy period in itself, it brings representation to Africa, and it brings representation to western colonialism. I think this is more significant to humanity than the assassination of William McKinley or the San Francisco earthquake, so maybe it could replace one of them? 05:30, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Silikonz 💬 20:30, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
– Per Wikinav, 72.6% of people who go to the 1900s article click through to 1900s (decade). Only 27.2% click through to 20th century. For the latter group, we could just put a hatnote redirecting people to 20th century. Koopinator ( talk) 13:58, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
The 1900s" usually denotes a century long period, starting with the year 1900 and ending with 1999. The "19 - Aughts" is far more specific to a decade. 2603:6011:A400:259:E072:4AB0:8E6C:CD23 ( talk) 23:51, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
It appears an RFC on collages on Wikiproject years will be interpreted to also ban collages in decade articles. Users here may wish to participate. Koopinator ( talk) 07:35, 24 December 2023 (UTC)