GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ¡
Article talk (
|
history) ¡
Watch
Reviewer: Chipmunkdavis ( talk ¡ contribs) 06:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Will take this on. If the current closure is temporary, it's probably a good idea to note that in the infobox where the "Closed" parameter seems quite final. The placement of the NRHP information seems quite out of place, not sure how it's part of the "Station layout". I'd generally expect it to be part of a cultural impact section, but if this stations has no such impact, the History section seems a better fit. The "Street stair" caption could be improved. Overall the article looks good at first glance however. Will get to a more detailed study over the next day or two. Best,
CMD (
talk)
06:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Thus the year 1899 ended with all the legal difficulties cleared away, all other obstacles surmounted and the path open for the advertisement and award of the great contract.Epicgenius ( talk) 17:53, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Stopping for now, would appreciate clarity on whether I'm reading the sources wrong, especially Walker. CMD ( talk) 16:48, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
I can't access most of the sources in this section, but given an issue was found and given the previous section this is a bit concerning.
Design seems well-written and supported.
Overall, it does feel this nomination was premature. Some sourcing concerns were addressed, but it seems there were more even among accessible ones. It does feel like there could be one or two more images, and that the images could be more effectively situated and captioned. On broadness, I'm not sure how reliable Forgotten NY is, but it notes there were 3 overhead crossovers [1]. This source notes that the elevator repair is intended to allow them to open directly onto the platform, which if true is missing from the article. This source and the MTA (assume that source got it from the MTA source) also say the elevators are 80 years old, whereas the article (and the bulletin sourced) say new ones were installed in the 90s. It would be interesting to know what exactly happened in the 90s and what is happening now, if sources allow. This article is also missing why the station is so deep, a question that seems readily answered by the Wheels that drove New York source already used for a different page. Given these, I am going to close this GAN for now, as it seems to need a thorough source check, but I hope work progresses on the matter, and that it can become a good article before it reopens. Best, CMD ( talk) 11:31, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ¡
Article talk (
|
history) ¡
Watch
Reviewer: Chipmunkdavis ( talk ¡ contribs) 06:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Will take this on. If the current closure is temporary, it's probably a good idea to note that in the infobox where the "Closed" parameter seems quite final. The placement of the NRHP information seems quite out of place, not sure how it's part of the "Station layout". I'd generally expect it to be part of a cultural impact section, but if this stations has no such impact, the History section seems a better fit. The "Street stair" caption could be improved. Overall the article looks good at first glance however. Will get to a more detailed study over the next day or two. Best,
CMD (
talk)
06:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Thus the year 1899 ended with all the legal difficulties cleared away, all other obstacles surmounted and the path open for the advertisement and award of the great contract.Epicgenius ( talk) 17:53, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Stopping for now, would appreciate clarity on whether I'm reading the sources wrong, especially Walker. CMD ( talk) 16:48, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
I can't access most of the sources in this section, but given an issue was found and given the previous section this is a bit concerning.
Design seems well-written and supported.
Overall, it does feel this nomination was premature. Some sourcing concerns were addressed, but it seems there were more even among accessible ones. It does feel like there could be one or two more images, and that the images could be more effectively situated and captioned. On broadness, I'm not sure how reliable Forgotten NY is, but it notes there were 3 overhead crossovers [1]. This source notes that the elevator repair is intended to allow them to open directly onto the platform, which if true is missing from the article. This source and the MTA (assume that source got it from the MTA source) also say the elevators are 80 years old, whereas the article (and the bulletin sourced) say new ones were installed in the 90s. It would be interesting to know what exactly happened in the 90s and what is happening now, if sources allow. This article is also missing why the station is so deep, a question that seems readily answered by the Wheels that drove New York source already used for a different page. Given these, I am going to close this GAN for now, as it seems to need a thorough source check, but I hope work progresses on the matter, and that it can become a good article before it reopens. Best, CMD ( talk) 11:31, 29 March 2021 (UTC)