This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
As is done with the pages on 1000, 2000, ... 9000, this page will have a list of selected non-round numbers following, but here it will go through to 99999, because it is foreseen that fewer numbers in the 10001 - 99999 range will merit their own pages than is the case with 1001 - 9999. So properties are added to numbers listed here, or if the number is not already listed, then it is added. If a number has enough properties listed that it merits its own article, then the content is moved to its own article and formatted according to the template given at Wikipedia:WikiProject Numbers, and on this page a link to the new page is put. PrimeFan 23:15, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Shouldn't this page have a comma in the title? ( 10,000 (number))
I removed this because I don't quite believe it. "Idolized and respected"? Just for posting 10000 messages? Then another group that ought to be "idolized and respected" consists of Republican bloggers too chicken to enlist in the Army or Navy. PrimeFan 17:50, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
There are over 300 balanced primes with 5 digits in base 10, so it's not necessary to list them on this page. PrimeFan 21:37, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
maybe now its the time to split this into 20000 (number), 30000 (number), etc. Numerao 22:08, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
With Unicode encoding I'm not seeing the characters in Aramaic. For the other languages yes, but not this one. Are there unicode characters for Aramaic? If not, it will have to be given as a transliteration only. - Parsa ( talk) 04:54, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 21:09, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 21:10, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 21:10, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 21:10, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Yesterday
Arthur Rubin has "Reverted
good faith edits by Maurice Carbonaro motivating with "
Seems trivial" the line about 10101 (number) properties as follow:
It may seem trivial but I wonder who knows why this happens or knows anything about this particular number property.
I am posting a RFC on the talk page to discuss wether it should be the case to cancel this contibution alltogether.
Thanks.
Maurice Carbonaro (
talk)
06:52, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
I am trying to find a word for equals 10,000 years — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.165.77.184 ( talk) 13:11, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
or
The result of the move request was: pages moved. Will perform the moves now. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Steven Crossin 02:17, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
10000 (number) →
10,000,
20000 (number) →
20,000,
30000 (number) →
30,000,
40000 (number) →
40,000,
50000 (number) →
50,000,
60000 (number) →
60,000,
70000 (number) →
70,000,
80000 (number) →
80,000, and
90000 (number) →
90,000, – (number) dab not needed for five digit numbers.
Fish567 (
talk)
01:30, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Follow-up question: If this discussion closes as move, can we also boldly move other five-digit integers such as 16807 (number), or does anyone feel that this would need a further RM? Certes ( talk) 10:47, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:300 (number) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 19:17, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
As is done with the pages on 1000, 2000, ... 9000, this page will have a list of selected non-round numbers following, but here it will go through to 99999, because it is foreseen that fewer numbers in the 10001 - 99999 range will merit their own pages than is the case with 1001 - 9999. So properties are added to numbers listed here, or if the number is not already listed, then it is added. If a number has enough properties listed that it merits its own article, then the content is moved to its own article and formatted according to the template given at Wikipedia:WikiProject Numbers, and on this page a link to the new page is put. PrimeFan 23:15, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Shouldn't this page have a comma in the title? ( 10,000 (number))
I removed this because I don't quite believe it. "Idolized and respected"? Just for posting 10000 messages? Then another group that ought to be "idolized and respected" consists of Republican bloggers too chicken to enlist in the Army or Navy. PrimeFan 17:50, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
There are over 300 balanced primes with 5 digits in base 10, so it's not necessary to list them on this page. PrimeFan 21:37, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
maybe now its the time to split this into 20000 (number), 30000 (number), etc. Numerao 22:08, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
With Unicode encoding I'm not seeing the characters in Aramaic. For the other languages yes, but not this one. Are there unicode characters for Aramaic? If not, it will have to be given as a transliteration only. - Parsa ( talk) 04:54, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 21:09, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 21:10, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 21:10, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 21:10, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Yesterday
Arthur Rubin has "Reverted
good faith edits by Maurice Carbonaro motivating with "
Seems trivial" the line about 10101 (number) properties as follow:
It may seem trivial but I wonder who knows why this happens or knows anything about this particular number property.
I am posting a RFC on the talk page to discuss wether it should be the case to cancel this contibution alltogether.
Thanks.
Maurice Carbonaro (
talk)
06:52, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
I am trying to find a word for equals 10,000 years — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.165.77.184 ( talk) 13:11, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
or
The result of the move request was: pages moved. Will perform the moves now. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Steven Crossin 02:17, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
10000 (number) →
10,000,
20000 (number) →
20,000,
30000 (number) →
30,000,
40000 (number) →
40,000,
50000 (number) →
50,000,
60000 (number) →
60,000,
70000 (number) →
70,000,
80000 (number) →
80,000, and
90000 (number) →
90,000, – (number) dab not needed for five digit numbers.
Fish567 (
talk)
01:30, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Follow-up question: If this discussion closes as move, can we also boldly move other five-digit integers such as 16807 (number), or does anyone feel that this would need a further RM? Certes ( talk) 10:47, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:300 (number) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 19:17, 14 April 2024 (UTC)