This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
100,000 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
This needs to be moved back to 100000 (number) for consistency with other articles on integer > 999. This issue was already voted on a couple of years ago and the commaless format was agreed on. PrimeFan 22:31, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
This article claims that 107777 is the smallest number requiring 16 syllables in English. What about 77777? Ok I may be wrong but please bear with me: se-ven-ty-se-ven-thou-sand-se-ven-hun-dred-se-ven-ty-se-ven... Where's my (probably stupid) mistake? — Hillel 04:18, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
...following 99999 and preceding 100001.
Citation needed?
CartoonistHenning (
talk) 18:00, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
all vampire numbers cannot be prime numbers. 117607 is divisible by 167 and 701. 175.139.46.122 ( talk) 08:35, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
nhxjbdeuasx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.250.30.115 ( talk) 02:18, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Does this belong here? All other numbers are mathematically interesting, but not this one. 78.159.216.4 ( talk) 15:53, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: article moved.( non-admin closure) Kostas20142 ( talk) 16:41, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
100000 (number) →
100,000 – Easier to read, also removes unnecessary (number) dab.
Fish567 (
talk) 23:24, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 262144. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 13:28, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
105.112.11.60 ( talk) 15:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Why are there different sections at #100,001 to 199,999, like #100,001 to 109,999? Shouldn't it be all in a single section? Viewer719 Talk!/ Contribs! 10:01, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:300 (number) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 19:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
100,000 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
This needs to be moved back to 100000 (number) for consistency with other articles on integer > 999. This issue was already voted on a couple of years ago and the commaless format was agreed on. PrimeFan 22:31, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
This article claims that 107777 is the smallest number requiring 16 syllables in English. What about 77777? Ok I may be wrong but please bear with me: se-ven-ty-se-ven-thou-sand-se-ven-hun-dred-se-ven-ty-se-ven... Where's my (probably stupid) mistake? — Hillel 04:18, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
...following 99999 and preceding 100001.
Citation needed?
CartoonistHenning (
talk) 18:00, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
all vampire numbers cannot be prime numbers. 117607 is divisible by 167 and 701. 175.139.46.122 ( talk) 08:35, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
nhxjbdeuasx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.250.30.115 ( talk) 02:18, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Does this belong here? All other numbers are mathematically interesting, but not this one. 78.159.216.4 ( talk) 15:53, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: article moved.( non-admin closure) Kostas20142 ( talk) 16:41, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
100000 (number) →
100,000 – Easier to read, also removes unnecessary (number) dab.
Fish567 (
talk) 23:24, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 262144. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 13:28, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
105.112.11.60 ( talk) 15:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Why are there different sections at #100,001 to 199,999, like #100,001 to 109,999? Shouldn't it be all in a single section? Viewer719 Talk!/ Contribs! 10:01, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:300 (number) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 19:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC)