A user with 12,368 edits. Account created on 4 February 2005.
17 February 2015
- 04:30 04:30, 17 February 2015 diff hist +123 m Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 4 →Support: Adjusted after refactoring of the page: "See my response to Beeblebrox at my Oppose vote, below (now moved to the talkpage). It's all very telling!"
- 04:16 04:16, 17 February 2015 diff hist +4,272 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 4 →Discussion concerning Noetica's oppose: Since we're tidying things, let's do it evenhandedly
- 04:16 04:16, 17 February 2015 diff hist −3,846 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 4 →Oppose: Since we're tidying things, let's do it evenhandedly
15 February 2015
- 22:02 22:02, 15 February 2015 diff hist +462 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 4 →Oppose: I share your confidence, Beeblebrox: on present evidence the crats must deal with vastly more impartiality than we can expect from the admin corps. NOW stop? ☺?
14 February 2015
- 23:51 23:51, 14 February 2015 diff hist +327 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 4 →Oppose: It's interesting that it troubles Beeblebrox ... Just move on.
- 23:29 23:29, 14 February 2015 diff hist +521 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 4 →Oppose: I suppose that's one way to crash through, Beeblebrox – when evidence and dispassionate argument can't be summoned.
- 22:23 22:23, 14 February 2015 diff hist +241 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 4 →Support: On Beeblebrox and "grudgeholding": Perhaps that is an easy aspersion to cast, for an admin not interested in the other sides of stories. ☺
- 22:16 22:16, 14 February 2015 diff hist +939 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 4 →Oppose: Will others turned off by Sarek's marauding come forward and vote here? Not likely, if they risk a reception such as Beeblebrox gives.
13 February 2015
- 12:02 12:02, 13 February 2015 diff hist +2 m Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 4 →Oppose: Fixed the date; Sarek's third RfA was just a year before this fourth one
- 06:43 06:43, 13 February 2015 diff hist +1,083 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 4 →Oppose: Oppose as before. What has changed?
21 March 2014
- 01:31 01:31, 21 March 2014 diff hist 0 m Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment →Statement by Noetica: Punctuation fix.
- 01:14 01:14, 21 March 2014 diff hist +1,291 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment →Statement by Noetica: To Carcharoth: please recuse forthwith
20 March 2014
- 05:33 05:33, 20 March 2014 diff hist +296 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment →Statement by Noetica: Additions and amendments for clarity
- 04:12 04:12, 20 March 2014 diff hist +2,345 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment →Statement by {other user}: User:Noetica's statement in support of "an un-diffed log"
25 January 2014
- 01:25 01:25, 25 January 2014 diff hist +3,693 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 3 →Oppose: [Though retired:] Moved some commentary from above, now part of my vote; editors, do not censor serious contributions; the section is labelled DISCUSSION; compare many many other RfAs, like this: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Cindamuse
24 January 2014
- 15:54 15:54, 24 January 2014 diff hist +541 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 3 →Support: From the desk of one retired from editing, and blissfully above the fray: "If you don't know Sarek's handiwork, study the opinions of those who know it all too well. Otherwise, better and more honest to vote with a monosyllable."
- 02:52 02:52, 24 January 2014 diff hist +546 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 3 →Support: Comment from a retired editor, again: "To move beyond impressions and guesswork, look at the whole history in WP:AE archives, and ''much'' more that preceded that." Opposition is well founded, and the evidence is all there if you want it.
- 02:16 02:16, 24 January 2014 diff hist +458 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 3 →Support: Another brief post from a retired editor: "Interesting. And I, maintaining a consistent opposition to indulging such sustained disregard for process, fairness, and ordinary hard-working Wikipedians, urge opposers to keep opposing."
23 January 2014
- 11:49 11:49, 23 January 2014 diff hist +65 Wikipedia:Featured article candidates Undid revision 592010799 by Noetica ( talk) Sorry. I don't even edit WP any more! Accidentally clicked on rollback as I browsed through recent changes.
- 11:46 11:46, 23 January 2014 diff hist −65 m Wikipedia:Featured article candidates Reverted edits by Mike Cline ( talk) to last version by Ian Rose
22 January 2014
- 01:19 01:19, 22 January 2014 diff hist +867 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 3 →Support: Another brief appearance, though I am retired from editing: "How is that not a typically superficial response to the cultivated macho glamour that this candidate exhibits?"
20 January 2014
- 01:44 01:44, 20 January 2014 diff hist +1,207 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 3 →Oppose: Appearing just briefly, to oppose a would-be admin whose behaviour is ultimately responsible for my permanent retirement from editing Wikipedia
11 April 2013
- 05:28 05:28, 11 April 2013 diff hist +1,696 Wikipedia:Reference desk/Computing →Router: current UK pronunciations?: Risposta al trovatore
10 April 2013
- 09:30 09:30, 10 April 2013 diff hist +990 Wikipedia:Reference desk/Computing →Router: current UK pronunciations?: Thanks
9 April 2013
- 11:21 11:21, 9 April 2013 diff hist +787 Wikipedia:Reference desk/Computing →Router: current UK pronunciations?: new section
9 February 2013
- 22:04 22:04, 9 February 2013 diff hist +336 User talk:Sven Manguard Undid revision 537447643 by Noetica ( talk); accidental edit, completely random – when using a handheld device to view my watchlist
- 22:01 22:01, 9 February 2013 diff hist −336 m User talk:Sven Manguard Reverted edits by Dom497 ( talk) to last version by Sven Manguard
- 05:27 05:27, 9 February 2013 diff hist +218 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dirtlawyer1 →Oppose: More fixes
- 05:15 05:15, 9 February 2013 diff hist +59 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dirtlawyer1 →Oppose: Small fixes, and I'm outa here (৳!)
- 05:10 05:10, 9 February 2013 diff hist +2,402 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dirtlawyer1 →Oppose: Oppose (Noetica's cameo appearance ♥)
7 February 2013
- 09:13 09:13, 7 February 2013 diff hist −9,495 User talk:Noetica Final archiving
3 February 2013
- 11:38 11:38, 3 February 2013 diff hist −3,512 User talk:Noetica →Leaving Wikipedia, as promised: Finishing archiving
- 11:37 11:37, 3 February 2013 diff hist +922 User talk:Noetica →Retired from Wikipedia: new section
- 11:33 11:33, 3 February 2013 diff hist −23 User talk:Noetica Fixing a date range
- 11:18 11:18, 3 February 2013 diff hist −54,304 User talk:Noetica Archiving
- 11:15 11:15, 3 February 2013 diff hist −13,017 User talk:Noetica Retired now
- 11:05 11:05, 3 February 2013 diff hist +1,065 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style →An edit in the provisions for ellipses: Of course ellipses feature in mathematical notations ...
- 09:03 09:03, 3 February 2013 diff hist +3,141 User talk:Noetica →Leaving Wikipedia, as promised: Answering Born2cycle, and sequestering the exchange in a box ☺
- 01:53 01:53, 3 February 2013 diff hist +1,286 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style →An edit in the provisions for ellipses: new section
- 01:42 01:42, 3 February 2013 diff hist −54 m Wikipedia:Manual of Style Reverted edits by TakuyaMurata ( talk) to last version by Noetica
- 01:11 01:11, 3 February 2013 diff hist −54 Wikipedia:Manual of Style Revert addition of this text to the provisions for ellipses: "(This section does not apply to mathematical notion.)" [sic]; editors, please do not make substantive changes like that without discussing them first; and DO leave informative edit summaries♥
- 01:05 01:05, 3 February 2013 diff hist +600 User talk:Noetica →Sandstein's misunderstanding of the AE issues and consequent bogus warning: I'm leaving, for good. See above. The only reason I will stay on for a while is to support any ArbCom action ... to deal with the abuses by admins listed above. ☺
2 February 2013
- 08:50 08:50, 2 February 2013 diff hist +1,344 User talk:Noetica →Your thoughts on article titles: Answering BDD
- 08:25 08:25, 2 February 2013 diff hist +223 User talk:Sandstein →Talkback: From Noetica also
- 08:22 08:22, 2 February 2013 diff hist +2,015 User talk:Noetica →Arbitration enforcement warning: Manual of Style and article titles policy: Adding a subsection: "=== Leaving Wikipedia, as promised ==="
- 07:45 07:45, 2 February 2013 diff hist +2,216 Talk:Big (film) →Discuss RM 2, section 2: Some responses, and tidying up
- 07:21 07:21, 2 February 2013 diff hist −1 m Talk:Big (film) →Discuss RM 2, section 1: Fixed an accidental linebreak
- 05:35 05:35, 2 February 2013 diff hist +583 Talk:Theater District, Manhattan →Requested move: Oppose; boldly corrected one word in the proposal, to avoid confusion: English → British
- 05:21 05:21, 2 February 2013 diff hist −5 m Talk:Brand New →Survey: Typo
- 05:17 05:17, 2 February 2013 diff hist +236 Talk:Brand New →Discussion: Pointer to new subsection: "I have addressed the failed refutation below. See the subsection #Count the psychopaths."
A user with 12,368 edits. Account created on 4 February 2005.
17 February 2015
- 04:30 04:30, 17 February 2015 diff hist +123 m Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 4 →Support: Adjusted after refactoring of the page: "See my response to Beeblebrox at my Oppose vote, below (now moved to the talkpage). It's all very telling!"
- 04:16 04:16, 17 February 2015 diff hist +4,272 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 4 →Discussion concerning Noetica's oppose: Since we're tidying things, let's do it evenhandedly
- 04:16 04:16, 17 February 2015 diff hist −3,846 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 4 →Oppose: Since we're tidying things, let's do it evenhandedly
15 February 2015
- 22:02 22:02, 15 February 2015 diff hist +462 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 4 →Oppose: I share your confidence, Beeblebrox: on present evidence the crats must deal with vastly more impartiality than we can expect from the admin corps. NOW stop? ☺?
14 February 2015
- 23:51 23:51, 14 February 2015 diff hist +327 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 4 →Oppose: It's interesting that it troubles Beeblebrox ... Just move on.
- 23:29 23:29, 14 February 2015 diff hist +521 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 4 →Oppose: I suppose that's one way to crash through, Beeblebrox – when evidence and dispassionate argument can't be summoned.
- 22:23 22:23, 14 February 2015 diff hist +241 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 4 →Support: On Beeblebrox and "grudgeholding": Perhaps that is an easy aspersion to cast, for an admin not interested in the other sides of stories. ☺
- 22:16 22:16, 14 February 2015 diff hist +939 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 4 →Oppose: Will others turned off by Sarek's marauding come forward and vote here? Not likely, if they risk a reception such as Beeblebrox gives.
13 February 2015
- 12:02 12:02, 13 February 2015 diff hist +2 m Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 4 →Oppose: Fixed the date; Sarek's third RfA was just a year before this fourth one
- 06:43 06:43, 13 February 2015 diff hist +1,083 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 4 →Oppose: Oppose as before. What has changed?
21 March 2014
- 01:31 01:31, 21 March 2014 diff hist 0 m Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment →Statement by Noetica: Punctuation fix.
- 01:14 01:14, 21 March 2014 diff hist +1,291 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment →Statement by Noetica: To Carcharoth: please recuse forthwith
20 March 2014
- 05:33 05:33, 20 March 2014 diff hist +296 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment →Statement by Noetica: Additions and amendments for clarity
- 04:12 04:12, 20 March 2014 diff hist +2,345 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment →Statement by {other user}: User:Noetica's statement in support of "an un-diffed log"
25 January 2014
- 01:25 01:25, 25 January 2014 diff hist +3,693 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 3 →Oppose: [Though retired:] Moved some commentary from above, now part of my vote; editors, do not censor serious contributions; the section is labelled DISCUSSION; compare many many other RfAs, like this: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Cindamuse
24 January 2014
- 15:54 15:54, 24 January 2014 diff hist +541 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 3 →Support: From the desk of one retired from editing, and blissfully above the fray: "If you don't know Sarek's handiwork, study the opinions of those who know it all too well. Otherwise, better and more honest to vote with a monosyllable."
- 02:52 02:52, 24 January 2014 diff hist +546 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 3 →Support: Comment from a retired editor, again: "To move beyond impressions and guesswork, look at the whole history in WP:AE archives, and ''much'' more that preceded that." Opposition is well founded, and the evidence is all there if you want it.
- 02:16 02:16, 24 January 2014 diff hist +458 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 3 →Support: Another brief post from a retired editor: "Interesting. And I, maintaining a consistent opposition to indulging such sustained disregard for process, fairness, and ordinary hard-working Wikipedians, urge opposers to keep opposing."
23 January 2014
- 11:49 11:49, 23 January 2014 diff hist +65 Wikipedia:Featured article candidates Undid revision 592010799 by Noetica ( talk) Sorry. I don't even edit WP any more! Accidentally clicked on rollback as I browsed through recent changes.
- 11:46 11:46, 23 January 2014 diff hist −65 m Wikipedia:Featured article candidates Reverted edits by Mike Cline ( talk) to last version by Ian Rose
22 January 2014
- 01:19 01:19, 22 January 2014 diff hist +867 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 3 →Support: Another brief appearance, though I am retired from editing: "How is that not a typically superficial response to the cultivated macho glamour that this candidate exhibits?"
20 January 2014
- 01:44 01:44, 20 January 2014 diff hist +1,207 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan 3 →Oppose: Appearing just briefly, to oppose a would-be admin whose behaviour is ultimately responsible for my permanent retirement from editing Wikipedia
11 April 2013
- 05:28 05:28, 11 April 2013 diff hist +1,696 Wikipedia:Reference desk/Computing →Router: current UK pronunciations?: Risposta al trovatore
10 April 2013
- 09:30 09:30, 10 April 2013 diff hist +990 Wikipedia:Reference desk/Computing →Router: current UK pronunciations?: Thanks
9 April 2013
- 11:21 11:21, 9 April 2013 diff hist +787 Wikipedia:Reference desk/Computing →Router: current UK pronunciations?: new section
9 February 2013
- 22:04 22:04, 9 February 2013 diff hist +336 User talk:Sven Manguard Undid revision 537447643 by Noetica ( talk); accidental edit, completely random – when using a handheld device to view my watchlist
- 22:01 22:01, 9 February 2013 diff hist −336 m User talk:Sven Manguard Reverted edits by Dom497 ( talk) to last version by Sven Manguard
- 05:27 05:27, 9 February 2013 diff hist +218 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dirtlawyer1 →Oppose: More fixes
- 05:15 05:15, 9 February 2013 diff hist +59 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dirtlawyer1 →Oppose: Small fixes, and I'm outa here (৳!)
- 05:10 05:10, 9 February 2013 diff hist +2,402 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dirtlawyer1 →Oppose: Oppose (Noetica's cameo appearance ♥)
7 February 2013
- 09:13 09:13, 7 February 2013 diff hist −9,495 User talk:Noetica Final archiving
3 February 2013
- 11:38 11:38, 3 February 2013 diff hist −3,512 User talk:Noetica →Leaving Wikipedia, as promised: Finishing archiving
- 11:37 11:37, 3 February 2013 diff hist +922 User talk:Noetica →Retired from Wikipedia: new section
- 11:33 11:33, 3 February 2013 diff hist −23 User talk:Noetica Fixing a date range
- 11:18 11:18, 3 February 2013 diff hist −54,304 User talk:Noetica Archiving
- 11:15 11:15, 3 February 2013 diff hist −13,017 User talk:Noetica Retired now
- 11:05 11:05, 3 February 2013 diff hist +1,065 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style →An edit in the provisions for ellipses: Of course ellipses feature in mathematical notations ...
- 09:03 09:03, 3 February 2013 diff hist +3,141 User talk:Noetica →Leaving Wikipedia, as promised: Answering Born2cycle, and sequestering the exchange in a box ☺
- 01:53 01:53, 3 February 2013 diff hist +1,286 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style →An edit in the provisions for ellipses: new section
- 01:42 01:42, 3 February 2013 diff hist −54 m Wikipedia:Manual of Style Reverted edits by TakuyaMurata ( talk) to last version by Noetica
- 01:11 01:11, 3 February 2013 diff hist −54 Wikipedia:Manual of Style Revert addition of this text to the provisions for ellipses: "(This section does not apply to mathematical notion.)" [sic]; editors, please do not make substantive changes like that without discussing them first; and DO leave informative edit summaries♥
- 01:05 01:05, 3 February 2013 diff hist +600 User talk:Noetica →Sandstein's misunderstanding of the AE issues and consequent bogus warning: I'm leaving, for good. See above. The only reason I will stay on for a while is to support any ArbCom action ... to deal with the abuses by admins listed above. ☺
2 February 2013
- 08:50 08:50, 2 February 2013 diff hist +1,344 User talk:Noetica →Your thoughts on article titles: Answering BDD
- 08:25 08:25, 2 February 2013 diff hist +223 User talk:Sandstein →Talkback: From Noetica also
- 08:22 08:22, 2 February 2013 diff hist +2,015 User talk:Noetica →Arbitration enforcement warning: Manual of Style and article titles policy: Adding a subsection: "=== Leaving Wikipedia, as promised ==="
- 07:45 07:45, 2 February 2013 diff hist +2,216 Talk:Big (film) →Discuss RM 2, section 2: Some responses, and tidying up
- 07:21 07:21, 2 February 2013 diff hist −1 m Talk:Big (film) →Discuss RM 2, section 1: Fixed an accidental linebreak
- 05:35 05:35, 2 February 2013 diff hist +583 Talk:Theater District, Manhattan →Requested move: Oppose; boldly corrected one word in the proposal, to avoid confusion: English → British
- 05:21 05:21, 2 February 2013 diff hist −5 m Talk:Brand New →Survey: Typo
- 05:17 05:17, 2 February 2013 diff hist +236 Talk:Brand New →Discussion: Pointer to new subsection: "I have addressed the failed refutation below. See the subsection #Count the psychopaths."