00:3500:35, 10 September 2020diffhist+19
Slamdance Film Festival
Thé WP article lacks verification. The reason I’ve taken on Slamdance FF is because they’re hypocrites who keep the industry to themselves like so many insiders. I’ve once again asked for a fee waiver. No response. I want people to see my film. But I am broke. Please read this NYTimes link. The industry NEEDS TO OPEN TO COMPETITION and the Academy finally recognized that. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/08/movies/oscars-diversity-rules-best-picture.htmlTags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
9 September 2020
05:2005:20, 9 September 2020diffhist+51
Slamdance Film Festival
Competition is good for innovation and the marketplace of ideas. Nepotism is the opposite of competition and you have plenty of that at Slamdance. So the goal is to keep competition alive not stifle it so that incentivized filmmakers can succeed.Tags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
14:5014:50, 6 September 2020diffhist+17
Slamdance Film Festival
Slamdance is a whites-only club created for the promotion of it’s Filmmaker founders. I worked on my zero-budget film fir five years with 165 people. It was an enormous sacrifice because Hispanic women begins the cameras simply don’t exist. And these People do whatever they want. They will Gaslight you’re to promote themselves. They need to be exposed, not promoted by Wikipedia. Where is the outrage?!Tags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
13:3713:37, 6 September 2020diffhist+105
Slamdance Film Festival
Slamdance Founder Dan Mirvish self promotes on his own festival and given the numerous articles on him by Scott McCauley of Filmmaking Magazine I think there’s cronyism to the detriment of struggling filmmakers. Slamdance is a scam And created to self promote — https://filmmakermagazine.com/72600-13-ways-to-cast-a-list-actors-in-microbudget-films/#.X1TkrCUieEcTags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
01:1201:12, 6 September 2020diffhist+130
Slamdance Film Festival
Why do these people keep changing the truth. Slamdance is no more a festival for emerging filmmakers than I am from the moon. Can someone take a look at this?Tags: Manual revertMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
00:3800:38, 6 September 2020diffhist+123
Slamdance Film Festival
These Slamdance people keep lying. Why are they allowed to lie on Wikipedia? It’s a wealthy whites (mostly male) only film festival and the founders created it to select their own films.Tags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
22:1722:17, 5 September 2020diffhist+24
Slamdance Film Festival
I am very sad that what takes these entitled white guys a few weeks to achieve takes someone like me an entire lifetime — and then some. Hypocrites.Tags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
22:1122:11, 5 September 2020diffhist+3
Slamdance Film Festival
A little better syntax. Slamdance refuses to do the right thing which is to face their bias. I would hope the press exposes their double standard. But minority filmmakers scramble at the bottom and watch the wealthy white filmmakers fawn over each other while they gaslight you.Tags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
17:4717:47, 5 September 2020diffhist+36
Slamdance Film Festival
Enter grammar. These people have gaslighted me without the time of day. Racist elitist homogenous wealth. Examples of an industry that offers no opportunities to dedicated struggling minority filmmakers Because it’s all about them or their friends without any contact or compassion to anyone else. They need to be exposed. But bring on the outside as a Hispanic female filmmaker means I have NO ACCESSTags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
17:0117:01, 5 September 2020diffhist+39
Slamdance Film Festival
Elite film festivals like Slamdance think their wealthy homogenous selectees (in some cases themselves) are more deserving than minorities filmmakers. Call them what they are whites only film festivals for the well-connected. They have totally gaslighted me E.g. without a decent response. I’m a Hispanic woman filmmaker without any budget. Wikipedia cannot be used to promote the wealthy elites who continue to keep doors shut in entertainment. HypocritesTags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
4 September 2020
23:4323:43, 4 September 2020diffhist+6
Slamdance Film Festival
This is an all white film festival that Self selects and awards it’s own founders. How is it that no one says anything about it. Their selectees — famous Homogenous moneyed people — are all too happy to pay lip service to minorities while the doors remain obviously shut.Tags: Manual revertMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
07:0107:01, 4 September 2020diffhist+6
Slamdance Film Festival
Dear John. Are you aware that Slamdance FF selects and awards It’s own founders? Where is the outrage that their slate is all white? I asked for a Fee waiver and was told it wouldn’t be fair to other filmmakers. What do they know about fairness? How about a story on these scams? There’s little or no diversity because it’s not exposed. When it rains... (2020) An intimate look into the lives of those cheated upon during a two-week rain storm in 1972 Hollywood. https://www.imdb.com/title...Tags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
2 September 2020
22:3022:30, 2 September 2020diffhist+5
Slamdance Film Festival
Slate of films is all white. Why is Wikipedia used to gush over a festival that selects it’s own founders? Do you have any idea how hard it is to make a film without a budget. It’s all about them. Always. There’s absolutely no access. Why don’t they say that?Tags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
19:3419:34, 29 August 2020diffhist+61
Slamdance Film Festival
→Founding: If Wikipedia mentions that Slamdance film festival was created so its founders could screen their own films In it, then it would be fair Information. Otherwise it’s for self aggrandizement propaganda.Tags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
18:2118:21, 29 August 2020diffhist+235
Slamdance Film Festival
Grammar and disclosure. A film festival that self-selects its own founder as a winner should not be used on Wikipedia as a propaganda tool against hard working minorities and women filmmakers who have little or no access. Wikipedia should apply page rules evenly. Wikipedia removed a page on my successful short on Justice “anonymous (street meat)”. My production designer/art director son Frank Varela’s page was removed as well. Please explain. https://filmmakermagazine.com/72600-13-ways-to-...Tags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
00:2000:20, 29 August 2020diffhist−1
Slamdance Film Festival
Now I’m told I’m blacklisted for calling out Slamdance hypocrisy. So Dan Mirvish selects himself the winner of his own festival. He gets written about on filmmaker magazine and doesn’t disclose his connection to the festival but it’s the minority woman filmmaker who gets blacklisted.Tags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
00:3500:35, 10 September 2020diffhist+19
Slamdance Film Festival
Thé WP article lacks verification. The reason I’ve taken on Slamdance FF is because they’re hypocrites who keep the industry to themselves like so many insiders. I’ve once again asked for a fee waiver. No response. I want people to see my film. But I am broke. Please read this NYTimes link. The industry NEEDS TO OPEN TO COMPETITION and the Academy finally recognized that. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/08/movies/oscars-diversity-rules-best-picture.htmlTags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
9 September 2020
05:2005:20, 9 September 2020diffhist+51
Slamdance Film Festival
Competition is good for innovation and the marketplace of ideas. Nepotism is the opposite of competition and you have plenty of that at Slamdance. So the goal is to keep competition alive not stifle it so that incentivized filmmakers can succeed.Tags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
14:5014:50, 6 September 2020diffhist+17
Slamdance Film Festival
Slamdance is a whites-only club created for the promotion of it’s Filmmaker founders. I worked on my zero-budget film fir five years with 165 people. It was an enormous sacrifice because Hispanic women begins the cameras simply don’t exist. And these People do whatever they want. They will Gaslight you’re to promote themselves. They need to be exposed, not promoted by Wikipedia. Where is the outrage?!Tags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
13:3713:37, 6 September 2020diffhist+105
Slamdance Film Festival
Slamdance Founder Dan Mirvish self promotes on his own festival and given the numerous articles on him by Scott McCauley of Filmmaking Magazine I think there’s cronyism to the detriment of struggling filmmakers. Slamdance is a scam And created to self promote — https://filmmakermagazine.com/72600-13-ways-to-cast-a-list-actors-in-microbudget-films/#.X1TkrCUieEcTags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
01:1201:12, 6 September 2020diffhist+130
Slamdance Film Festival
Why do these people keep changing the truth. Slamdance is no more a festival for emerging filmmakers than I am from the moon. Can someone take a look at this?Tags: Manual revertMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
00:3800:38, 6 September 2020diffhist+123
Slamdance Film Festival
These Slamdance people keep lying. Why are they allowed to lie on Wikipedia? It’s a wealthy whites (mostly male) only film festival and the founders created it to select their own films.Tags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
22:1722:17, 5 September 2020diffhist+24
Slamdance Film Festival
I am very sad that what takes these entitled white guys a few weeks to achieve takes someone like me an entire lifetime — and then some. Hypocrites.Tags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
22:1122:11, 5 September 2020diffhist+3
Slamdance Film Festival
A little better syntax. Slamdance refuses to do the right thing which is to face their bias. I would hope the press exposes their double standard. But minority filmmakers scramble at the bottom and watch the wealthy white filmmakers fawn over each other while they gaslight you.Tags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
17:4717:47, 5 September 2020diffhist+36
Slamdance Film Festival
Enter grammar. These people have gaslighted me without the time of day. Racist elitist homogenous wealth. Examples of an industry that offers no opportunities to dedicated struggling minority filmmakers Because it’s all about them or their friends without any contact or compassion to anyone else. They need to be exposed. But bring on the outside as a Hispanic female filmmaker means I have NO ACCESSTags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
17:0117:01, 5 September 2020diffhist+39
Slamdance Film Festival
Elite film festivals like Slamdance think their wealthy homogenous selectees (in some cases themselves) are more deserving than minorities filmmakers. Call them what they are whites only film festivals for the well-connected. They have totally gaslighted me E.g. without a decent response. I’m a Hispanic woman filmmaker without any budget. Wikipedia cannot be used to promote the wealthy elites who continue to keep doors shut in entertainment. HypocritesTags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
4 September 2020
23:4323:43, 4 September 2020diffhist+6
Slamdance Film Festival
This is an all white film festival that Self selects and awards it’s own founders. How is it that no one says anything about it. Their selectees — famous Homogenous moneyed people — are all too happy to pay lip service to minorities while the doors remain obviously shut.Tags: Manual revertMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
07:0107:01, 4 September 2020diffhist+6
Slamdance Film Festival
Dear John. Are you aware that Slamdance FF selects and awards It’s own founders? Where is the outrage that their slate is all white? I asked for a Fee waiver and was told it wouldn’t be fair to other filmmakers. What do they know about fairness? How about a story on these scams? There’s little or no diversity because it’s not exposed. When it rains... (2020) An intimate look into the lives of those cheated upon during a two-week rain storm in 1972 Hollywood. https://www.imdb.com/title...Tags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
2 September 2020
22:3022:30, 2 September 2020diffhist+5
Slamdance Film Festival
Slate of films is all white. Why is Wikipedia used to gush over a festival that selects it’s own founders? Do you have any idea how hard it is to make a film without a budget. It’s all about them. Always. There’s absolutely no access. Why don’t they say that?Tags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
19:3419:34, 29 August 2020diffhist+61
Slamdance Film Festival
→Founding: If Wikipedia mentions that Slamdance film festival was created so its founders could screen their own films In it, then it would be fair Information. Otherwise it’s for self aggrandizement propaganda.Tags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
18:2118:21, 29 August 2020diffhist+235
Slamdance Film Festival
Grammar and disclosure. A film festival that self-selects its own founder as a winner should not be used on Wikipedia as a propaganda tool against hard working minorities and women filmmakers who have little or no access. Wikipedia should apply page rules evenly. Wikipedia removed a page on my successful short on Justice “anonymous (street meat)”. My production designer/art director son Frank Varela’s page was removed as well. Please explain. https://filmmakermagazine.com/72600-13-ways-to-...Tags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
00:2000:20, 29 August 2020diffhist−1
Slamdance Film Festival
Now I’m told I’m blacklisted for calling out Slamdance hypocrisy. So Dan Mirvish selects himself the winner of his own festival. He gets written about on filmmaker magazine and doesn’t disclose his connection to the festival but it’s the minority woman filmmaker who gets blacklisted.Tags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit