18:5918:59, 19 April 2024diffhist−682
Multiwinner voting
Sorry for undoing the revision. I do not think it fits the spirit of the criterion. For instance in a multiwinner voting setting using scores, selecting the k candidates with the highest score is arguably the "excellence" voting method. However, it is not "majority" based. Undid revision
1219695165 by
Rankedchoicevoter (
talk)Tag: Undo
18:2618:26, 7 April 2024diffhist−3,506
Condorcet paradox
→Example: I do not think this example adds much to the article at the current moment. The graphic does not look professional enough and is not really understandable. Further, I do not really see the contribution of this graphic to making the article more understandable (and not just to ``promote'' score voting)
18:5918:59, 19 April 2024diffhist−682
Multiwinner voting
Sorry for undoing the revision. I do not think it fits the spirit of the criterion. For instance in a multiwinner voting setting using scores, selecting the k candidates with the highest score is arguably the "excellence" voting method. However, it is not "majority" based. Undid revision
1219695165 by
Rankedchoicevoter (
talk)Tag: Undo
18:2618:26, 7 April 2024diffhist−3,506
Condorcet paradox
→Example: I do not think this example adds much to the article at the current moment. The graphic does not look professional enough and is not really understandable. Further, I do not really see the contribution of this graphic to making the article more understandable (and not just to ``promote'' score voting)