20:3720:37, 10 April 2013diffhist−3,502
William S. Clark
I think including a transcription of the entire document is really overkill. It also is inserted arbitrarily in the middle of the narrative. Perhaps pull some key quotes? Or create a separate article on the document?
21:3221:32, 13 November 2012diffhist−380
Myles Standish
New section "On the Mayflower" duplicates some information in the following section. Have merged the prose of two paragraphs into one. Move photo to Mayflower section.
15:5215:52, 28 March 2012diffhist−47
Isaac Davis (soldier)
Previous edit is a nice sentiment, but too vague not appropriate for the lead. Perhaps if more information were provided a notation about Boy Scout troops could go somewhere in the body of the article.
20:3720:37, 10 April 2013diffhist−3,502
William S. Clark
I think including a transcription of the entire document is really overkill. It also is inserted arbitrarily in the middle of the narrative. Perhaps pull some key quotes? Or create a separate article on the document?
21:3221:32, 13 November 2012diffhist−380
Myles Standish
New section "On the Mayflower" duplicates some information in the following section. Have merged the prose of two paragraphs into one. Move photo to Mayflower section.
15:5215:52, 28 March 2012diffhist−47
Isaac Davis (soldier)
Previous edit is a nice sentiment, but too vague not appropriate for the lead. Perhaps if more information were provided a notation about Boy Scout troops could go somewhere in the body of the article.