00:1900:19, 28 May 2022diffhist+8
Battle of Antonov Airport
→Battle: That is what can be drawn from the sources. Note that several statements of fact contained in the sources are actually claims by various officials, and attribution is sometimes sloppy or not immediately obvious.
13:5713:57, 3 May 2022diffhist+567
Kramatorsk railway station attack
→top: Restoring pertinent
reliable sources that focus on the attack on Kramatorsk. The other sources really are about other events and mention the attack on the Kramatorsk railway station only in passing. In my opinion, these sources are not acceptable given there is no shortage of reliable sources. However, I let others decide how to improve the article in that respect.
13:4413:44, 3 May 2022diffhist−397
Kramatorsk railway station attack
→top: Removing BBC source that is about a different set of attacks, mentions the "Russian attack" on the Kramatorsk railway station in passing, linking to another BBC article that does *not* say that the attack was executed by Russia. We need to use the best sources if multiple sources are available.
13:3513:35, 3 May 2022diffhist+8
Kramatorsk railway station attack
→top: Reverting to Infobox military operation. It was a military attack on civilians, not a civilian attack. The template is explicity meant for that kind of event. Also, it was a missile strike, not an airstrike - the missiles were land-based.
27 April 2022
01:1201:12, 27 April 2022diffhist−5
Kramatorsk railway station attack
→top: "Experts", not "some experts" - the latter may be understood as indicating a number of experts relative to the total number of experts. More precise wording may of course be inserted, with proper sourcing.
26 April 2022
22:4022:40, 26 April 2022diffhist+634
Kramatorsk railway station attack
Undid revision 1084641075 by
Rafaelosornio (
talk) This is what the Italian source
La Republicca says. If you think some other wording would better summarize what is in the article, change the text, do not delete the source. Adding Bellingcat as source. There is no necessity to use English sources, although that is preferred if available. (As for the Spanish article, it apparently only contains the Twitter post.)
20:3620:36, 22 April 2022diffhist−51
Kramatorsk railway station attack
→top: Removing "executed by". While the article correctly states that the origin of the attack is not known, based on reliable sources, the majority of reliable sources do not prominently say so. Any attempt to summarize what the article now says into a few words would probably fail.Tag: Reverted
16:3416:34, 12 April 2022diffhist+78
Kramatorsk railway station attack
"attributed to Russia", based on Le Monde. This is representative of how the majority of
reliable sources present the event. Most do not explicity say that the attack was executed by Russia. Le Monde explicitly says that the strike is attributed to Russia.Tag: Reverted
00:1900:19, 28 May 2022diffhist+8
Battle of Antonov Airport
→Battle: That is what can be drawn from the sources. Note that several statements of fact contained in the sources are actually claims by various officials, and attribution is sometimes sloppy or not immediately obvious.
13:5713:57, 3 May 2022diffhist+567
Kramatorsk railway station attack
→top: Restoring pertinent
reliable sources that focus on the attack on Kramatorsk. The other sources really are about other events and mention the attack on the Kramatorsk railway station only in passing. In my opinion, these sources are not acceptable given there is no shortage of reliable sources. However, I let others decide how to improve the article in that respect.
13:4413:44, 3 May 2022diffhist−397
Kramatorsk railway station attack
→top: Removing BBC source that is about a different set of attacks, mentions the "Russian attack" on the Kramatorsk railway station in passing, linking to another BBC article that does *not* say that the attack was executed by Russia. We need to use the best sources if multiple sources are available.
13:3513:35, 3 May 2022diffhist+8
Kramatorsk railway station attack
→top: Reverting to Infobox military operation. It was a military attack on civilians, not a civilian attack. The template is explicity meant for that kind of event. Also, it was a missile strike, not an airstrike - the missiles were land-based.
27 April 2022
01:1201:12, 27 April 2022diffhist−5
Kramatorsk railway station attack
→top: "Experts", not "some experts" - the latter may be understood as indicating a number of experts relative to the total number of experts. More precise wording may of course be inserted, with proper sourcing.
26 April 2022
22:4022:40, 26 April 2022diffhist+634
Kramatorsk railway station attack
Undid revision 1084641075 by
Rafaelosornio (
talk) This is what the Italian source
La Republicca says. If you think some other wording would better summarize what is in the article, change the text, do not delete the source. Adding Bellingcat as source. There is no necessity to use English sources, although that is preferred if available. (As for the Spanish article, it apparently only contains the Twitter post.)
20:3620:36, 22 April 2022diffhist−51
Kramatorsk railway station attack
→top: Removing "executed by". While the article correctly states that the origin of the attack is not known, based on reliable sources, the majority of reliable sources do not prominently say so. Any attempt to summarize what the article now says into a few words would probably fail.Tag: Reverted
16:3416:34, 12 April 2022diffhist+78
Kramatorsk railway station attack
"attributed to Russia", based on Le Monde. This is representative of how the majority of
reliable sources present the event. Most do not explicity say that the attack was executed by Russia. Le Monde explicitly says that the strike is attributed to Russia.Tag: Reverted