09:4409:44, 28 June 2023diffhist+2
m
Paragliding
→Safety: extreme sport -> adventure sport. It is not classified as an extreme sport, e.g., in Switzerland (which explicitly distinguishes these)
09:2409:24, 27 February 2019diffhist+836
Future Circular Collider
I added a small paragraph on criticism for balance, but in large parts the article still reads like an ad. Nowhere is there any criticism, alternative views, etc., despite widespread coverage of such criticism (the only exception is in the paragraph that I just added)
15:5815:58, 12 February 2019diffhist+30
Google Brain
the article contains a lot of phrasing not supported by citations or generally unsuitable for Wikipedia. E.g. "breakthroughs", "leading researcher", "eager to devote own passion", "flexibly combine", etc.
11:4511:45, 22 January 2019diffhist+36
Future Circular Collider
+advertisement tag. a large part of the article is written from the point of view of someone who is heavily involved in (and in favor of) the FCC study. It's not impartial and uses exclusively very positive phrasing, e.g.: "A future “energy frontier” collider at 100 TeV is a “discovery machine”, reaching out to so far unknown territories."
09:4409:44, 28 June 2023diffhist+2
m
Paragliding
→Safety: extreme sport -> adventure sport. It is not classified as an extreme sport, e.g., in Switzerland (which explicitly distinguishes these)
09:2409:24, 27 February 2019diffhist+836
Future Circular Collider
I added a small paragraph on criticism for balance, but in large parts the article still reads like an ad. Nowhere is there any criticism, alternative views, etc., despite widespread coverage of such criticism (the only exception is in the paragraph that I just added)
15:5815:58, 12 February 2019diffhist+30
Google Brain
the article contains a lot of phrasing not supported by citations or generally unsuitable for Wikipedia. E.g. "breakthroughs", "leading researcher", "eager to devote own passion", "flexibly combine", etc.
11:4511:45, 22 January 2019diffhist+36
Future Circular Collider
+advertisement tag. a large part of the article is written from the point of view of someone who is heavily involved in (and in favor of) the FCC study. It's not impartial and uses exclusively very positive phrasing, e.g.: "A future “energy frontier” collider at 100 TeV is a “discovery machine”, reaching out to so far unknown territories."