19:0519:05, 9 November 2023diffhist−303
The Chosen (TV series)
→Reception: Not necessarily reapply per se. We could discuss on the talk page if you weren't clear, but you are clear enough. «If the sources» are blogs, it would be best to remove the other statement, as its source belongs to the same page that I cited. How about that?...Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
16:5816:58, 9 November 2023diffhist+963
The Chosen (TV series)
That's accurate! I withdraw the synthesis between those two references. Let's explore and salvage the wording this way. Let's see..."Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
14:5714:57, 3 November 2023diffhist+4,592
Daniel Noboa
«Which specific action should be discussed? The thing is, I clarify many sections, and it would have to be a particular one.»Tags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
13:0113:01, 11 May 2022diffhist+74
Azov Brigade
Last reversal, this is a decision already made in RfC 2021, I insist, read the text I just quoted, before the horde of reversals.Tags: UndoReverted
12:5512:55, 11 May 2022diffhist+74
Azov Brigade
I haven't talked about votes, read my quoted text, the decision was made in the first sentence with option "C", and in Wikipedia we acts on the strength of the arguments.Tags: UndoReverted
12:4012:40, 11 May 2022diffhist+74
Azov Brigade
I quote RfC:''With regard to the second question of handling reports: The option to "Mention that many political observers and news outlets have described it as neo-Nazi and reported extensively on having links to neo-Nazi groups."(C) has a very clear majority in both numbers and strength of arguments over either A or B.''Tags: UndoReverted
19:0519:05, 9 November 2023diffhist−303
The Chosen (TV series)
→Reception: Not necessarily reapply per se. We could discuss on the talk page if you weren't clear, but you are clear enough. «If the sources» are blogs, it would be best to remove the other statement, as its source belongs to the same page that I cited. How about that?...Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
16:5816:58, 9 November 2023diffhist+963
The Chosen (TV series)
That's accurate! I withdraw the synthesis between those two references. Let's explore and salvage the wording this way. Let's see..."Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
14:5714:57, 3 November 2023diffhist+4,592
Daniel Noboa
«Which specific action should be discussed? The thing is, I clarify many sections, and it would have to be a particular one.»Tags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
13:0113:01, 11 May 2022diffhist+74
Azov Brigade
Last reversal, this is a decision already made in RfC 2021, I insist, read the text I just quoted, before the horde of reversals.Tags: UndoReverted
12:5512:55, 11 May 2022diffhist+74
Azov Brigade
I haven't talked about votes, read my quoted text, the decision was made in the first sentence with option "C", and in Wikipedia we acts on the strength of the arguments.Tags: UndoReverted
12:4012:40, 11 May 2022diffhist+74
Azov Brigade
I quote RfC:''With regard to the second question of handling reports: The option to "Mention that many political observers and news outlets have described it as neo-Nazi and reported extensively on having links to neo-Nazi groups."(C) has a very clear majority in both numbers and strength of arguments over either A or B.''Tags: UndoReverted