09:4809:48, 27 June 2017diffhist−43
Future Cruise/Anti-Ship Weapon
Removed uncited reference to "continuous wave detonation engine". As this is an emerging technology, strong reference must be made if it is to be quoted as present.
3 February 2017
16:3516:35, 3 February 2017diffhist−62
Calcium nitrite
Removed a reference to anti-oxidant, as is stated in the source, and as is known in the chemical industry, Calcium Nitrite is an oxidising agent.
14:3814:38, 16 December 2016diffhist−51
Hsiung Feng III
Taiwan has no nuclear weapons at this time: "The Republic of China (Taiwan) denies having any weapons of mass destruction. There is no evidence of Taiwan possessing any chemical or nuclear weapons though it has pursued nuclear weapons in the past."
16:1316:13, 15 December 2016diffhist+625
Hsiung Feng III
There are many instances of unsubstantiated information that contradict physical law and information from shown references, some of it contradicted within the same article.
11:3611:36, 12 December 2016diffhist−221
Hsiung Feng III
Removed another reference to Mach 10+ flight. removed reference to possible 15000km range. These are fantasy figures made up by a journalist. 15000km is further than some ICBMs... might as well have said "warp 10 capable"Tag: references removed
17:1617:16, 5 December 2016diffhist−133
Hsiung Feng III
Removed all reference to "hypersonic" as there is no support, and no technological precedent either (Ramjets only effective up to ~M.5ish, no faster airbreathing alternative as of 2016)
09:4809:48, 27 June 2017diffhist−43
Future Cruise/Anti-Ship Weapon
Removed uncited reference to "continuous wave detonation engine". As this is an emerging technology, strong reference must be made if it is to be quoted as present.
3 February 2017
16:3516:35, 3 February 2017diffhist−62
Calcium nitrite
Removed a reference to anti-oxidant, as is stated in the source, and as is known in the chemical industry, Calcium Nitrite is an oxidising agent.
14:3814:38, 16 December 2016diffhist−51
Hsiung Feng III
Taiwan has no nuclear weapons at this time: "The Republic of China (Taiwan) denies having any weapons of mass destruction. There is no evidence of Taiwan possessing any chemical or nuclear weapons though it has pursued nuclear weapons in the past."
16:1316:13, 15 December 2016diffhist+625
Hsiung Feng III
There are many instances of unsubstantiated information that contradict physical law and information from shown references, some of it contradicted within the same article.
11:3611:36, 12 December 2016diffhist−221
Hsiung Feng III
Removed another reference to Mach 10+ flight. removed reference to possible 15000km range. These are fantasy figures made up by a journalist. 15000km is further than some ICBMs... might as well have said "warp 10 capable"Tag: references removed
17:1617:16, 5 December 2016diffhist−133
Hsiung Feng III
Removed all reference to "hypersonic" as there is no support, and no technological precedent either (Ramjets only effective up to ~M.5ish, no faster airbreathing alternative as of 2016)