29 September 2016

• 08:04 08:04, 29 September 2016 diff hist −1,437‎ Robert Lee Moore ‎ It's not just a matter of phrasing, unfortunately; the portion that I am removing depends upon an unreliable source, Williams' "racist mathematician unveiled" rant. The references listed there do not support his claims.
• 06:28 06:28, 29 September 2016 diff hist −1,468‎ Robert Lee Moore ‎ Undid revision 741693839 by 69.206.136.67 ( talk)

26 September 2016

• 21:28 21:28, 26 September 2016 diff hist −1,468‎ Robert Lee Moore ‎ Undid revision 741278030 by 108.29.95.50 ( talk)

25 September 2016

• 09:00 09:00, 25 September 2016 diff hist −1,468‎ Robert Lee Moore ‎ Undid revision 741003014 by 69.206.136.67 ( talk)

20 September 2016

• 04:08 04:08, 20 September 2016 diff hist −1,468‎ Robert Lee Moore ‎ Undid revision 740190837 by 24.240.67.157 ( talk)

18 September 2016

• 23:43 23:43, 18 September 2016 diff hist −1,468‎ Robert Lee Moore ‎ Undid revision 740018462 by 24.240.67.157 ( talk)
• 03:22 03:22, 18 September 2016 diff hist −1,468‎ Robert Lee Moore ‎ Undid revision 739879327 by 24.240.67.157 ( talk) The sources given are not reliable, and I have already explained why.

17 September 2016

• 06:14 06:14, 17 September 2016 diff hist −1,468‎ Robert Lee Moore ‎ No. If you want a claim to be in an article, -you- have to provide reliable sources to support it. You can't just post whatever you want and say it's up to others to disprove it.

16 September 2016

• 03:19 03:19, 16 September 2016 diff hist −1,468‎ Robert Lee Moore ‎ Undid revision 739651330 by 24.240.67.157 ( talk) Everything I've previously said still applies. The "racist mathematician unveiled" MAD page is not a reliable source.

14 September 2016

• 06:16 06:16, 14 September 2016 diff hist −1,468‎ Robert Lee Moore ‎ Undid revision 739330237 by 24.240.67.157 ( talk)
• 00:02 00:02, 14 September 2016 diff hist −1,468‎ Robert Lee Moore ‎ The quote isn't on the page about Hunt that you keep trying to use to cite it, and the news article uses the MAD pages as its source for the quote. Please stop kvetching about "whitewashing" and actually look at the things you're linking.

13 September 2016

• 04:27 04:27, 13 September 2016 diff hist −1,468‎ Robert Lee Moore ‎ MAD (the site with the "racist mathematician unveiled" page) is absolutely not a reliable source. The Historia preprint mentions that Moore supported segregation, but doesn't support the more extreme claims of mistreatment.

12 September 2016

• 01:17 01:17, 12 September 2016 diff hist −1,943‎ Robert Lee Moore ‎ No, the fact that the author's sources don't support what he's saying at all makes it garbage. Go read the articles in his list -- the AMS and Topology Proceedings articles are publicly available now.

10 September 2016

• 03:03 03:03, 10 September 2016 diff hist +346‎ Talk:Robert Lee Moore ‎ →‎How to handle the issue of RLM's racism
• 02:11 02:11, 10 September 2016 diff hist −1,943‎ Robert Lee Moore ‎ The "racist mathematician unveiled" page is garbage, and the "second source" is a page from the same collection. The quote from Hunt is also NOT in the linked page, contrary to what another editor has claimed.

12 August 2016

• 02:54 02:54, 12 August 2016 diff hist −1,189‎ Robert Lee Moore ‎ Removing claims of racism come from highly questionable sources. See talk page.
• 02:46 02:46, 12 August 2016 diff hist +408‎ Talk:Robert Lee Moore ‎No edit summary
• 02:33 02:33, 12 August 2016 diff hist −401‎ Robert Lee Moore ‎ Removed quote not found in cited article.

9 August 2016

• 23:52 23:52, 9 August 2016 diff hist +607‎ Talk:Palimpsest ‎No edit summary