05:2305:23, 22 April 2020diffhist+7
Popeye (film)
Wikilink
Stalag because I only half knew the joke from watching war films. (Alternatively instead of a link the text could be expanded to make it clearer, something like "Robins joked it was like a prison camp, calling it Stalag Altman")
03:0803:08, 22 April 2020diffhist−40
The Orville
While I'm at it I may as well remove another entirely unnecessary table heading. Totally redundant, there's a section heading immediately before it, not even some prose in between.
03:0603:06, 22 April 2020diffhist−40
The Orville
Must be embarrassing to fail to spell The Orville correctly, but there's simply no need for a table heading, or to include the show name in the heading.
02:2302:23, 22 April 2020diffhist−17
Max Landis
WP:STATUSQUO The focus of the section is exactly the same, the recently changed section heading is not an improvement, I'm merely restoring what was there up until recent changes. Undid revision 952406674 by
Sro23 (
talk)Tag: Undo
02:1002:10, 22 April 2020diffhist−17
Max Landis
Section heading is redundant and repetitive. Revert to "Controversy" (alternatively "Criticism" would work but that might be too neutral for some)
23:4923:49, 21 April 2020diffhist−3,265
Twin films
Revert. You must be kidding. Discuss on talk page if you are actually being serious. Also you will need to show some sources where anyone other than you claims these films are twins, or even interesting coincidences. Undid revision 952383532 by
Duc4Wikmedia (
talk)Tag: Undo
23:3223:32, 21 April 2020diffhist+5
Sherlock Gnomes
Critical response section needs reviews. A dead youtube link is useless, and archived version also useless, Better Reference needed.
23:1023:10, 21 April 2020diffhist+159
We Summon the Darkness
Restore source comment to help editors who might want to
WP:VERIFY because I know I thought it was weird that this had 8 named producers. (In most film articles you wouldn't have so many producers listed without incorrectly also including executive producers).
22:3922:39, 21 April 2020diffhist+119
Gomorrah (film)
Copyedit. Trueism. If it wasn't widespread it wouldn't really be critical acclaim. Like saying "very unique". Reception, needs to be expanded, a film with "widespread" critical acclaim should include some actual reviews from film critics, international and Italian critics too ideally.
15:5015:50, 21 April 2020diffhist+531
Future Man (TV series)
Rotten Tomatoes season 1, season 2, season 3. Will try to add reviews soon. Probably reviews from AV Club and Collider since they seem to be the only ones to consistently review all three seasons.
14:2414:24, 21 April 2020diffhist−26
Stuber (film)
Remove unnecessary '''Plot''' from Cast section. (was added by
User:Ridwan97 as part of a larger edit to add the name Tedjo throughout the article, edit dated as of 08:01, 24 July 2019.)
05:2305:23, 22 April 2020diffhist+7
Popeye (film)
Wikilink
Stalag because I only half knew the joke from watching war films. (Alternatively instead of a link the text could be expanded to make it clearer, something like "Robins joked it was like a prison camp, calling it Stalag Altman")
03:0803:08, 22 April 2020diffhist−40
The Orville
While I'm at it I may as well remove another entirely unnecessary table heading. Totally redundant, there's a section heading immediately before it, not even some prose in between.
03:0603:06, 22 April 2020diffhist−40
The Orville
Must be embarrassing to fail to spell The Orville correctly, but there's simply no need for a table heading, or to include the show name in the heading.
02:2302:23, 22 April 2020diffhist−17
Max Landis
WP:STATUSQUO The focus of the section is exactly the same, the recently changed section heading is not an improvement, I'm merely restoring what was there up until recent changes. Undid revision 952406674 by
Sro23 (
talk)Tag: Undo
02:1002:10, 22 April 2020diffhist−17
Max Landis
Section heading is redundant and repetitive. Revert to "Controversy" (alternatively "Criticism" would work but that might be too neutral for some)
23:4923:49, 21 April 2020diffhist−3,265
Twin films
Revert. You must be kidding. Discuss on talk page if you are actually being serious. Also you will need to show some sources where anyone other than you claims these films are twins, or even interesting coincidences. Undid revision 952383532 by
Duc4Wikmedia (
talk)Tag: Undo
23:3223:32, 21 April 2020diffhist+5
Sherlock Gnomes
Critical response section needs reviews. A dead youtube link is useless, and archived version also useless, Better Reference needed.
23:1023:10, 21 April 2020diffhist+159
We Summon the Darkness
Restore source comment to help editors who might want to
WP:VERIFY because I know I thought it was weird that this had 8 named producers. (In most film articles you wouldn't have so many producers listed without incorrectly also including executive producers).
22:3922:39, 21 April 2020diffhist+119
Gomorrah (film)
Copyedit. Trueism. If it wasn't widespread it wouldn't really be critical acclaim. Like saying "very unique". Reception, needs to be expanded, a film with "widespread" critical acclaim should include some actual reviews from film critics, international and Italian critics too ideally.
15:5015:50, 21 April 2020diffhist+531
Future Man (TV series)
Rotten Tomatoes season 1, season 2, season 3. Will try to add reviews soon. Probably reviews from AV Club and Collider since they seem to be the only ones to consistently review all three seasons.
14:2414:24, 21 April 2020diffhist−26
Stuber (film)
Remove unnecessary '''Plot''' from Cast section. (was added by
User:Ridwan97 as part of a larger edit to add the name Tedjo throughout the article, edit dated as of 08:01, 24 July 2019.)