31 October 2010

• 03:04 03:04, 31 October 2010 diff hist −56‎ Man ‎ Please go to the discussion page before reverting; I say there why this photo must be omitted until consensus----DO NOT REVERT
• 03:02 03:02, 31 October 2010 diff hist −3‎ Talk:Man ‎No edit summary
• 03:01 03:01, 31 October 2010 diff hist +781‎ Talk:Man ‎No edit summary
• 02:46 02:46, 31 October 2010 diff hist −56‎ Man ‎ no, the picture should be removed because the burden of consensus lies on those who want to add the photo, not on those who want nothing there
• 02:32 02:32, 31 October 2010 diff hist −56‎ Man ‎ you are back? are you paid to sentinel this page for Wikimedia and nudists who use this site as a soapbox to promote nudity toleration? I suggest you get a consensus for the picture
• 01:52 01:52, 31 October 2010 diff hist −56‎ Man ‎ Okay, I'm going to remove this picture and I think it should stay removed provided that a consensus about it has not been reached yet in the discussion page

18 October 2010

• 00:35 00:35, 18 October 2010 diff hist −1‎ Talk:Man ‎No edit summary
• 00:33 00:33, 18 October 2010 diff hist +59‎ Talk:Man ‎No edit summary
• 00:29 00:29, 18 October 2010 diff hist +6‎ Talk:Man ‎No edit summary
• 00:27 00:27, 18 October 2010 diff hist −10‎ Talk:Man ‎No edit summary
• 00:23 00:23, 18 October 2010 diff hist +1,773‎ Talk:Man ‎No edit summary

17 October 2010

• 22:19 22:19, 17 October 2010 diff hist +2‎ Talk:Man ‎No edit summary
• 22:17 22:17, 17 October 2010 diff hist −88‎ Talk:Man ‎No edit summary
• 22:14 22:14, 17 October 2010 diff hist +128‎ Talk:Man ‎No edit summary
• 22:09 22:09, 17 October 2010 diff hist +1,504‎ Talk:Man ‎No edit summary
• 18:39 18:39, 17 October 2010 diff hist +2‎ Talk:Man ‎No edit summary
• 18:36 18:36, 17 October 2010 diff hist −36‎ Talk:Man ‎No edit summary
• 02:23 02:23, 17 October 2010 diff hist −1‎ Talk:Man ‎No edit summary
• 02:03 02:03, 17 October 2010 diff hist −1‎ Talk:Man ‎No edit summary
• 02:01 02:01, 17 October 2010 diff hist 0‎ Talk:Man ‎No edit summary
• 01:57 01:57, 17 October 2010 diff hist +176‎ Talk:Man ‎No edit summary
• 01:54 01:54, 17 October 2010 diff hist +82‎ Talk:Man ‎No edit summary
• 01:54 01:54, 17 October 2010 diff hist +576‎ Talk:Man ‎No edit summary

8 October 2010

• 22:39 22:39, 8 October 2010 diff hist −56‎ Man ‎ yes, but if a consensus has not been reached, what makes keeping the image any more valid than not keeping it? you have no answer
• 04:10 04:10, 8 October 2010 diff hist −56‎ Man ‎ It looks like a consensus has been reached on the discussion page....this photo will be removed and hopefully we can all lay to rest this issue at last

28 September 2010

• 20:10 20:10, 28 September 2010 diff hist −56‎ Man ‎ David, you will not win!
• 20:07 20:07, 28 September 2010 diff hist −56‎ Man ‎ I don't need to use the talk page; I've told you that this picture is already in the human anatomy article and so it is superfluous here. Why does anal sex lack a real-life picture? Use a sketch!
• 19:55 19:55, 28 September 2010 diff hist −56‎ Man ‎ David Oaks, are you paid to monitor this page 24/7? Every time I come here I can see your efforts toward preserving the sanctity of that abomination of a picture-----your efforts are futile
• 17:56 17:56, 28 September 2010 diff hist −56‎ Man ‎ it's not just minors, there are plenty of other people like me who do not want to see this---and if I had a wife, I wouldn't want her looking at it either---so your point is moot
• 17:52 17:52, 28 September 2010 diff hist −56‎ Man ‎ Davidoaks, people who type in "man" or who are linked to this article, are not looking for a picture of a disgusting naked immature man--that's not what this article is about
• 17:48 17:48, 28 September 2010 diff hist −56‎ Man ‎ David Oaks, cease now! I will call an administrator on you. This SAME exact photo can be found in the "human anatomy" article---this page is not about human anatomy---so stop now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Tag: repeating characters
• 17:31 17:31, 28 September 2010 diff hist −56‎ Man ‎ If you are so infatuated with an image that "describes" this aspect of "man" (even though there are so many other aspects left untouched), bring in a sketch like the one in the French Wikipedia

27 September 2010

• 20:54 20:54, 27 September 2010 diff hist −55‎ Man ‎ you are wrong again, it is you (the consensus is on my side)who has to seek a consensus, you are immaturely infatuated with this photo, and you need to stop now; make some useful edits in this article
• 20:21 20:21, 27 September 2010 diff hist −55‎ Man ‎ stop uploading the shameful insipid image! stop now and don't do it again!
• 07:22 07:22, 27 September 2010 diff hist −55‎ Man ‎ why is having this image so important to you? Please, the discussion clearly is in favor of removal, have you looked at all the discussion subtitles?
• 05:28 05:28, 27 September 2010 diff hist −56‎ Man ‎ no where in wikipedia policy does it say that we have to put up an unprofessional unnatural image of a naked guy----nudity IS NOT the usual state of man, as I said before, put in in anatomy

26 September 2010

• 17:10 17:10, 26 September 2010 diff hist −56‎ Man ‎ ah, no, you are wrong, most support removal---why can't it be in human anatomy?
• 16:13 16:13, 26 September 2010 diff hist −56‎ Man ‎ this picture degrades the encyclopedic quality of this article, I am deleting it, look at the discussion page, most concur
• 07:38 07:38, 26 September 2010 diff hist −56‎ Man ‎ cease with the uploading of shameful nude pictures!