00:2100:21, 26 June 2024diffhist+191
Iblis
→Function: more page numbers, had to remove Sharp, though a good notion, the work is actually a master thesis and falls, unfortuantely, outside the scope of reliable sources.
21:4421:44, 25 June 2024diffhist−27
Iblis
adding page numbers, remove a still unsourced claim about the meaning of the term, and sorted the sources.
01:2201:22, 22 June 2024diffhist−12,620
Abrahamic religions
→Religions: Remove once again. An encyclopedia article is not to promote faith-systems or meant to be a list for classificaitons. The term 'Abrahamic religin' is a very specific term used for interreligious dialogue. If source cannot proof that these religions are part of said dialogue its just original resaerch to include them. And Mandaens there definately not referred by a term of the late 20th Cenutry.
13:0813:08, 7 June 2024diffhist+334
Adam
And yet, a lead section can be more lenghty to give an adequate overview of the matter. Restore the text partly. Still trimmed, but offers an explanation what the Gnostic myth even is about.
00:0200:02, 7 June 2024diffhist−50
Parī
the template is not needed anymore, only one (or maybe two) sections need more sources (one rather extention than verification), but the overall article is pretty muhc verified.
00:2100:21, 26 June 2024diffhist+191
Iblis
→Function: more page numbers, had to remove Sharp, though a good notion, the work is actually a master thesis and falls, unfortuantely, outside the scope of reliable sources.
21:4421:44, 25 June 2024diffhist−27
Iblis
adding page numbers, remove a still unsourced claim about the meaning of the term, and sorted the sources.
01:2201:22, 22 June 2024diffhist−12,620
Abrahamic religions
→Religions: Remove once again. An encyclopedia article is not to promote faith-systems or meant to be a list for classificaitons. The term 'Abrahamic religin' is a very specific term used for interreligious dialogue. If source cannot proof that these religions are part of said dialogue its just original resaerch to include them. And Mandaens there definately not referred by a term of the late 20th Cenutry.
13:0813:08, 7 June 2024diffhist+334
Adam
And yet, a lead section can be more lenghty to give an adequate overview of the matter. Restore the text partly. Still trimmed, but offers an explanation what the Gnostic myth even is about.
00:0200:02, 7 June 2024diffhist−50
Parī
the template is not needed anymore, only one (or maybe two) sections need more sources (one rather extention than verification), but the overall article is pretty muhc verified.