23:5923:59, 2 October 2009diffhist+169
Baby boom
Again, you start edit wars. You refuse to discuss on edit page, and refuse to give any specific reason for reverting my edit. Again, I ask you to please discuss.
23:5723:57, 2 October 2009diffhist+100
Generation gap
Again, you start edit wars. You refuse to discuss on edit page, and refuse to give any specific reason for reverting my edit. Again, I ask you to please discuss.
23:4423:44, 2 October 2009diffhist+85
Mid-20th century baby boom
Again, please stop starting edit wars. I have given specific reasons for this edit on the talk page, please give specific reasons it should be reverted instead of just blindly reverting
23:4323:43, 2 October 2009diffhist+1,541
Baby-Boom Generation
Again, please stop starting edit wars. I have given specific reasons for this edit on the talk page, please give specific reasons it should be reverted instead of just blindly reverting
23:4223:42, 2 October 2009diffhist+169
Baby boom
Again, please stop starting edit wars. I have given specific reasons for this edit on the talk page, please give specific reasons it should be reverted instead of just blindly reverting
23:3923:39, 2 October 2009diffhist+100
Generation gap
Again, please stop starting edit wars. I have given specific reasons for this edit on the talk page, please give specific reasons it should be reverted instead of just blindly reverting
00:0400:04, 2 October 2009diffhist+708
N
User talk:Drpropaganda
←Created page with '==Generation Articles== Drpropaganda: I noticed that you’ve had an interest in Generation Jones in the past. Over the last few months, a couple of Wikipedia users...'
23:4023:40, 1 October 2009diffhist+3,052
User talk:Arthur Rubin
reminding Rubin of his numerous bad faith edits, repeated breaking of Wiki rules, and asked him to please stop editing against the consensus of other editors
23:0523:05, 1 October 2009diffhist+1,733
Generation Jones
revert to version which has survived many edits over long period, and reflects consensus of almost all editors; only Arthur Rubin and a couple of other editors disagree
23:5923:59, 2 October 2009diffhist+169
Baby boom
Again, you start edit wars. You refuse to discuss on edit page, and refuse to give any specific reason for reverting my edit. Again, I ask you to please discuss.
23:5723:57, 2 October 2009diffhist+100
Generation gap
Again, you start edit wars. You refuse to discuss on edit page, and refuse to give any specific reason for reverting my edit. Again, I ask you to please discuss.
23:4423:44, 2 October 2009diffhist+85
Mid-20th century baby boom
Again, please stop starting edit wars. I have given specific reasons for this edit on the talk page, please give specific reasons it should be reverted instead of just blindly reverting
23:4323:43, 2 October 2009diffhist+1,541
Baby-Boom Generation
Again, please stop starting edit wars. I have given specific reasons for this edit on the talk page, please give specific reasons it should be reverted instead of just blindly reverting
23:4223:42, 2 October 2009diffhist+169
Baby boom
Again, please stop starting edit wars. I have given specific reasons for this edit on the talk page, please give specific reasons it should be reverted instead of just blindly reverting
23:3923:39, 2 October 2009diffhist+100
Generation gap
Again, please stop starting edit wars. I have given specific reasons for this edit on the talk page, please give specific reasons it should be reverted instead of just blindly reverting
00:0400:04, 2 October 2009diffhist+708
N
User talk:Drpropaganda
←Created page with '==Generation Articles== Drpropaganda: I noticed that you’ve had an interest in Generation Jones in the past. Over the last few months, a couple of Wikipedia users...'
23:4023:40, 1 October 2009diffhist+3,052
User talk:Arthur Rubin
reminding Rubin of his numerous bad faith edits, repeated breaking of Wiki rules, and asked him to please stop editing against the consensus of other editors
23:0523:05, 1 October 2009diffhist+1,733
Generation Jones
revert to version which has survived many edits over long period, and reflects consensus of almost all editors; only Arthur Rubin and a couple of other editors disagree