13:2713:27, 30 March 2008diffhist+1,150
Brilliant Light Power
Even Rathke recognized “the wealth of experimental evidence” for hydrinos that had already been published by the time of his hostile 2005 theoretical critique. That evidence is now even richer.
01:4401:44, 28 March 2008diffhist+5,007
Brilliant Light Power
Mills therefore thought that a new quantum theory was needed. At least one version of the Wiki article should be less steeply slanted toward the POV of his opponents, and have better documentation.
02:2502:25, 25 March 2008diffhist+5,051
Brilliant Light Power
Posted a fuller, better-documented version, which is also less steeply slanted toward the point of view (POV) of the opponents of Mills et al.
24 March 2008
00:5000:50, 24 March 2008diffhist+4,337
Brilliant Light Power
Posted a fuller version, with better documentation, a version that is also less steeply slanted toward the point of view (POV) of the opponents of Mills et al.
22 March 2008
22:5422:54, 22 March 2008diffhist+520
Brilliant Light Power
The reigning cosmology can now explain at best 5% of everything out there: Nicastro, Mathur, and Elvis, “Missing Baryons and the Warm-Hot Intergalactic Medium,” in Science 319 (Jan. 4, 2008).
21 March 2008
21:3521:35, 21 March 2008diffhist+4,337
Brilliant Light Power
Posted a version with better documentation, a version that is also less steeply slanted toward the views of the opponents of Mills et al.
20 March 2008
19:3719:37, 20 March 2008diffhist+346
Brilliant Light Power
Ordinary (low-temperature) superconductivity was thought to have been explained by BCS theory, but serious problems with that have been found: P. Aynajian et al., Science 319, pp. 1509-1512 (2008).
19 March 2008
18:1818:18, 19 March 2008diffhist+3,922
Brilliant Light Power
Restored a version of the article that is less steeply slanted toward the consensus of the opponents of Mills et al. and that has fuller documentation.
18 March 2008
18:1418:14, 18 March 2008diffhist+3,922
Brilliant Light Power
The article should explain what Mills’ theory is, and give some documentation for that, and not be so steeply slanted toward what his opponents think is wrong with Mills’ work.
16 March 2008
11:4011:40, 16 March 2008diffhist+3,622
Brilliant Light Power
The article is supposed to explain what Mills’ theory is, and give some documentation for that, and not be lopsidedly unbalanced toward what his opponents think is wrong with Mills’ work.
19:4619:46, 14 March 2008diffhist+1,200
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard
Michaelbusch has been leading the attack in the Wikipedia upon Mills, and upon me, so I hope that MastCell won’t accept Michaelbusch’s interpretations of Mills’ work and of my editing at face value.
16:4916:49, 10 March 2008diffhist+589
User talk:MastCell
Will notify if I go to the admin's noticeboard. Let me think about this, and see how much advantage Mills' opponents take of the new situation.
8 March 2008
16:4016:40, 8 March 2008diffhist+3,467
Brilliant Light Power
Athaenara: no block is in force against me: see the Block log. Why join the campaign of Mills’ opponents against him by making a blanket erasure that they want, including erasure of documentation?
16:0516:05, 2 March 2008diffhist+60
Brilliant Light Power
The citation to the false imputation of plagiarism is to an especially hostile longtime critic of Mills. Mills cited his sources and used the cited material for purposes of criticism and scholarship.
15:3515:35, 2 March 2008diffhist+231
Brilliant Light Power
Mills submitted a rebuttal to Rathke’s 2005 article that was too long. The editor replied that it would take a lot to convince him to publish even a short rebuttal: see SCQM message 11.
15:3315:33, 2 March 2008diffhist+160
Brilliant Light Power
Mills cited his sources and used excerpts from them for purposes of criticism and scholarship, so he was surprised to see that used to attack him.
15:3015:30, 2 March 2008diffhist+225
Brilliant Light Power
Millsian, the computational chemistry program based on CQM, has already modelled hundreds of molecules. See Mills’ book and the Millsian website.
15:2815:28, 2 March 2008diffhist+273
Brilliant Light Power
A comprehensive review of experimental evidence for small hydrogen atoms (hydrinos) is R. Mills et al., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 32, 14 (Sept. 2007), pp. 2988-3009.
15:2315:23, 2 March 2008diffhist+145
Brilliant Light Power
Mills doesn’t accept the reigning hypothesis of enormous expansion during an extremely brief and extremely rapid period of initial inflation.
15:0915:09, 2 March 2008diffhist+180
Brilliant Light Power
Undisturbed hydrogen atoms are shaped like balls (APS News 7, 4 (April 1998), p. 3), so they fit Mills' model of the hydrogen atom as well as the standard model.
14:5914:59, 2 March 2008diffhist+231
Brilliant Light Power
Restored a relevant quote. Even Rathke referred to the “wealth of experimental data that has been published in peer reviewed journals in favor of the hydrino model,” though he didn’t discuss the data
14:5614:56, 2 March 2008diffhist+232
Brilliant Light Power
Mills’ Classical Quantum Mechanics (CQM) is based on the classical physics of Newton and Maxwell, but essential quantum concepts like Planck’s constant appear throughout CQM.
14:5114:51, 2 March 2008diffhist+401
Brilliant Light Power
Mills has produced strong experimental evidence for hydrinos, including novel spectroscopic peaks in Mills & Ray 2003 (J. Phys. D. 36, pp. 1535-1542).
13:2713:27, 30 March 2008diffhist+1,150
Brilliant Light Power
Even Rathke recognized “the wealth of experimental evidence” for hydrinos that had already been published by the time of his hostile 2005 theoretical critique. That evidence is now even richer.
01:4401:44, 28 March 2008diffhist+5,007
Brilliant Light Power
Mills therefore thought that a new quantum theory was needed. At least one version of the Wiki article should be less steeply slanted toward the POV of his opponents, and have better documentation.
02:2502:25, 25 March 2008diffhist+5,051
Brilliant Light Power
Posted a fuller, better-documented version, which is also less steeply slanted toward the point of view (POV) of the opponents of Mills et al.
24 March 2008
00:5000:50, 24 March 2008diffhist+4,337
Brilliant Light Power
Posted a fuller version, with better documentation, a version that is also less steeply slanted toward the point of view (POV) of the opponents of Mills et al.
22 March 2008
22:5422:54, 22 March 2008diffhist+520
Brilliant Light Power
The reigning cosmology can now explain at best 5% of everything out there: Nicastro, Mathur, and Elvis, “Missing Baryons and the Warm-Hot Intergalactic Medium,” in Science 319 (Jan. 4, 2008).
21 March 2008
21:3521:35, 21 March 2008diffhist+4,337
Brilliant Light Power
Posted a version with better documentation, a version that is also less steeply slanted toward the views of the opponents of Mills et al.
20 March 2008
19:3719:37, 20 March 2008diffhist+346
Brilliant Light Power
Ordinary (low-temperature) superconductivity was thought to have been explained by BCS theory, but serious problems with that have been found: P. Aynajian et al., Science 319, pp. 1509-1512 (2008).
19 March 2008
18:1818:18, 19 March 2008diffhist+3,922
Brilliant Light Power
Restored a version of the article that is less steeply slanted toward the consensus of the opponents of Mills et al. and that has fuller documentation.
18 March 2008
18:1418:14, 18 March 2008diffhist+3,922
Brilliant Light Power
The article should explain what Mills’ theory is, and give some documentation for that, and not be so steeply slanted toward what his opponents think is wrong with Mills’ work.
16 March 2008
11:4011:40, 16 March 2008diffhist+3,622
Brilliant Light Power
The article is supposed to explain what Mills’ theory is, and give some documentation for that, and not be lopsidedly unbalanced toward what his opponents think is wrong with Mills’ work.
19:4619:46, 14 March 2008diffhist+1,200
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard
Michaelbusch has been leading the attack in the Wikipedia upon Mills, and upon me, so I hope that MastCell won’t accept Michaelbusch’s interpretations of Mills’ work and of my editing at face value.
16:4916:49, 10 March 2008diffhist+589
User talk:MastCell
Will notify if I go to the admin's noticeboard. Let me think about this, and see how much advantage Mills' opponents take of the new situation.
8 March 2008
16:4016:40, 8 March 2008diffhist+3,467
Brilliant Light Power
Athaenara: no block is in force against me: see the Block log. Why join the campaign of Mills’ opponents against him by making a blanket erasure that they want, including erasure of documentation?
16:0516:05, 2 March 2008diffhist+60
Brilliant Light Power
The citation to the false imputation of plagiarism is to an especially hostile longtime critic of Mills. Mills cited his sources and used the cited material for purposes of criticism and scholarship.
15:3515:35, 2 March 2008diffhist+231
Brilliant Light Power
Mills submitted a rebuttal to Rathke’s 2005 article that was too long. The editor replied that it would take a lot to convince him to publish even a short rebuttal: see SCQM message 11.
15:3315:33, 2 March 2008diffhist+160
Brilliant Light Power
Mills cited his sources and used excerpts from them for purposes of criticism and scholarship, so he was surprised to see that used to attack him.
15:3015:30, 2 March 2008diffhist+225
Brilliant Light Power
Millsian, the computational chemistry program based on CQM, has already modelled hundreds of molecules. See Mills’ book and the Millsian website.
15:2815:28, 2 March 2008diffhist+273
Brilliant Light Power
A comprehensive review of experimental evidence for small hydrogen atoms (hydrinos) is R. Mills et al., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 32, 14 (Sept. 2007), pp. 2988-3009.
15:2315:23, 2 March 2008diffhist+145
Brilliant Light Power
Mills doesn’t accept the reigning hypothesis of enormous expansion during an extremely brief and extremely rapid period of initial inflation.
15:0915:09, 2 March 2008diffhist+180
Brilliant Light Power
Undisturbed hydrogen atoms are shaped like balls (APS News 7, 4 (April 1998), p. 3), so they fit Mills' model of the hydrogen atom as well as the standard model.
14:5914:59, 2 March 2008diffhist+231
Brilliant Light Power
Restored a relevant quote. Even Rathke referred to the “wealth of experimental data that has been published in peer reviewed journals in favor of the hydrino model,” though he didn’t discuss the data
14:5614:56, 2 March 2008diffhist+232
Brilliant Light Power
Mills’ Classical Quantum Mechanics (CQM) is based on the classical physics of Newton and Maxwell, but essential quantum concepts like Planck’s constant appear throughout CQM.
14:5114:51, 2 March 2008diffhist+401
Brilliant Light Power
Mills has produced strong experimental evidence for hydrinos, including novel spectroscopic peaks in Mills & Ray 2003 (J. Phys. D. 36, pp. 1535-1542).