10:1210:12, 7 April 2020diffhist−64
COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden
→Debate: Right now one could as well say that Stockholm county has as many deaths as the Sweden’s neighboring countries combined. And conversely, that the rest of Sweden has way fewer deaths as a share of the population then neighboring countries. The success or failure can’t be judged by anecdotal comparisons like this at this point. Also: No source.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
12:0112:01, 20 July 2015diffhist+6
Iore
→History: not in source given (it states that the Janney couplers came as a part of the deal with Transnet and that the new hopper cars from K-Industrier is equipped with SA-3 couplers as the older types).
15:2115:21, 3 December 2013diffhist+1,246
Insite
moved response to Lancet article from "Research" to "Reception" and more, as the back-and-forth between Gwendolyn Landolt and Thomas Kerr already in "Reception" is about the very same issue
14:3914:39, 2 December 2013diffhist−2,931
Insite
Articles in New England Journal of Medicine, the Lancet, CMAJ, Addiction, ect is very dissimilar to what Drug Free Australia publishes. It is very much undue to give findings in the latter anything approaching the weight of the former. per UNDUE/MEDRS
19:3119:31, 1 December 2013diffhist−2,899
Insite
Drug Free Australia does not qualify for MEDRS: Note that the Magnham study is dealt with in "Reception" and not in "Research". Neither that study is MEDRS, but it is notable as it is was cited in the policy debate. Eg. DFA is also UNDUE.
13:0913:09, 22 May 2013diffhist−1,999
Needle and syringe programmes
→Research: by previous consensus articles from JGDPP is not considered MEDRS, On Käll's study in particular: http://stardustsblogg.blogspot.se/2011/07/spurious-research-and-pseudo-science-in.html
10:1210:12, 7 April 2020diffhist−64
COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden
→Debate: Right now one could as well say that Stockholm county has as many deaths as the Sweden’s neighboring countries combined. And conversely, that the rest of Sweden has way fewer deaths as a share of the population then neighboring countries. The success or failure can’t be judged by anecdotal comparisons like this at this point. Also: No source.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
12:0112:01, 20 July 2015diffhist+6
Iore
→History: not in source given (it states that the Janney couplers came as a part of the deal with Transnet and that the new hopper cars from K-Industrier is equipped with SA-3 couplers as the older types).
15:2115:21, 3 December 2013diffhist+1,246
Insite
moved response to Lancet article from "Research" to "Reception" and more, as the back-and-forth between Gwendolyn Landolt and Thomas Kerr already in "Reception" is about the very same issue
14:3914:39, 2 December 2013diffhist−2,931
Insite
Articles in New England Journal of Medicine, the Lancet, CMAJ, Addiction, ect is very dissimilar to what Drug Free Australia publishes. It is very much undue to give findings in the latter anything approaching the weight of the former. per UNDUE/MEDRS
19:3119:31, 1 December 2013diffhist−2,899
Insite
Drug Free Australia does not qualify for MEDRS: Note that the Magnham study is dealt with in "Reception" and not in "Research". Neither that study is MEDRS, but it is notable as it is was cited in the policy debate. Eg. DFA is also UNDUE.
13:0913:09, 22 May 2013diffhist−1,999
Needle and syringe programmes
→Research: by previous consensus articles from JGDPP is not considered MEDRS, On Käll's study in particular: http://stardustsblogg.blogspot.se/2011/07/spurious-research-and-pseudo-science-in.html