19:4119:41, 19 October 2018diffhist−879
Amy Cuddy
Undid revision 864833594 by
Praxidicae (
talk) The wikipedia guidelines clearly show that this is not a verifiable source. I suspect the editors that disagree have a conflict of interest. (Not interested in talking)Tag: Undo
19:3619:36, 19 October 2018diffhist−879
Amy Cuddy
Undid revision 864831449 by
Natureium (
talk) "Never use self-published sources as third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer." /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published_sourcesTag: Undo
21:0521:05, 20 June 2018diffhist−636
Amy Cuddy
Has not been discredited. Peer reviewed Cuddy et al 2018 shows evidence, Ranehill et al successfully replicated some hypothesized effects, Simmons and Simonsohn (DataColada 64) all show evidence in support of hypothesized effects.
18:2718:27, 16 November 2017diffhist−449
Power posing
Removing false statement that is not in reference. This allegation is potentially defamatory as if asserts accusations of academic misconduct. The accusations do not exist in the cited material. I will not remove this edit in future if you can show quoteTag: references removed
18:2218:22, 16 November 2017diffhist+83
Power posing
Replacing key fact that was removed by vandal. My point is clearly stated in the results of the paper that is cited.
18:1918:19, 16 November 2017diffhist+227
Power posing
If Carneys statements on power posing in 2016 are relevant then so too should her comments be in 2017. Citation included.
18:1618:16, 16 November 2017diffhist+326
Power posing
Undoing previous vandalism by jytdog where he removed content and the citation that shows the content to be true. (Psychological changes stated in abstract)
19:4119:41, 19 October 2018diffhist−879
Amy Cuddy
Undid revision 864833594 by
Praxidicae (
talk) The wikipedia guidelines clearly show that this is not a verifiable source. I suspect the editors that disagree have a conflict of interest. (Not interested in talking)Tag: Undo
19:3619:36, 19 October 2018diffhist−879
Amy Cuddy
Undid revision 864831449 by
Natureium (
talk) "Never use self-published sources as third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer." /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published_sourcesTag: Undo
21:0521:05, 20 June 2018diffhist−636
Amy Cuddy
Has not been discredited. Peer reviewed Cuddy et al 2018 shows evidence, Ranehill et al successfully replicated some hypothesized effects, Simmons and Simonsohn (DataColada 64) all show evidence in support of hypothesized effects.
18:2718:27, 16 November 2017diffhist−449
Power posing
Removing false statement that is not in reference. This allegation is potentially defamatory as if asserts accusations of academic misconduct. The accusations do not exist in the cited material. I will not remove this edit in future if you can show quoteTag: references removed
18:2218:22, 16 November 2017diffhist+83
Power posing
Replacing key fact that was removed by vandal. My point is clearly stated in the results of the paper that is cited.
18:1918:19, 16 November 2017diffhist+227
Power posing
If Carneys statements on power posing in 2016 are relevant then so too should her comments be in 2017. Citation included.
18:1618:16, 16 November 2017diffhist+326
Power posing
Undoing previous vandalism by jytdog where he removed content and the citation that shows the content to be true. (Psychological changes stated in abstract)