15:3315:33, 28 November 2018diffhist+1,289
Predatory publishing
Undid revision 871030987 by
Randykitty (
talk) I checked before citing it as a source, here a diploma: https://www.professeur-alexandre-georges.info/information-and-documentation ... So yes Alexandre George is Professor. Initially, the Dolos list is mostly shared on ResearchGate. You should take a look at what researchers think about Dolos list.Tag: Undo
15:2615:26, 28 November 2018diffhist−545
Critical Reviews in Toxicology
Undid revision 870842864 by
Randykitty (
talk) sorry, but this is not a peer-reviewed journal as defined here: /info/en/?search=Peer_review ... It is more likely a pseudo-scientific journal. To claim that the journal is "peer-reviewed", when it is not, helps to promote its quality when it is far from the standards of legitimate publishing.Tags: Undoreferences removed
26 November 2018
22:4322:43, 26 November 2018diffhist−545
Critical Reviews in Toxicology
Undoing Randykitty revision for its promotional character. The
Center for Public Integrity has clearly demonstrated that this is not a peer-reviewed journal and previously provided sources were documented (Center for Public Integrity and Dolos list statements). In addition, without
Center for Public Integrity article about this journal, the subject of this wikipedia article would not have enough notoriety and media reference to be presented on the encyclopedia.Tag: references removed
15:3315:33, 28 November 2018diffhist+1,289
Predatory publishing
Undid revision 871030987 by
Randykitty (
talk) I checked before citing it as a source, here a diploma: https://www.professeur-alexandre-georges.info/information-and-documentation ... So yes Alexandre George is Professor. Initially, the Dolos list is mostly shared on ResearchGate. You should take a look at what researchers think about Dolos list.Tag: Undo
15:2615:26, 28 November 2018diffhist−545
Critical Reviews in Toxicology
Undid revision 870842864 by
Randykitty (
talk) sorry, but this is not a peer-reviewed journal as defined here: /info/en/?search=Peer_review ... It is more likely a pseudo-scientific journal. To claim that the journal is "peer-reviewed", when it is not, helps to promote its quality when it is far from the standards of legitimate publishing.Tags: Undoreferences removed
26 November 2018
22:4322:43, 26 November 2018diffhist−545
Critical Reviews in Toxicology
Undoing Randykitty revision for its promotional character. The
Center for Public Integrity has clearly demonstrated that this is not a peer-reviewed journal and previously provided sources were documented (Center for Public Integrity and Dolos list statements). In addition, without
Center for Public Integrity article about this journal, the subject of this wikipedia article would not have enough notoriety and media reference to be presented on the encyclopedia.Tag: references removed