09:5509:55, 30 April 2008diffhist−409
Neve Yaakov
and yet Saeb Erekat, ARIJ & Peace Now have no problem saying just that - you've made up a position that they contradict
09:5509:55, 30 April 2008diffhist−741
Gilo
and yet Saeb Erekat, ARIJ & Peace Now have no problem saying just that - you've made up a position that they contradict
09:5309:53, 30 April 2008diffhist−471
Pisgat Ze'ev
not your sources - you are taking a position contradicted by Saeb Erekat, ARIJ & Peace Now, & still deleting information
09:5209:52, 30 April 2008diffhist−138
Har Homa
not your sources - you are taking a position contradicted by Saeb Erekat, ARIJ & Peace Now, & still deleting information
08:5108:51, 29 April 2008diffhist−138
Har Homa
yet you keep removing words you don't like from the lead & no, irrelevent because you are just expanding on one detail of the whole issue
10:0710:07, 27 April 2008diffhist−471
Har Homa
you can't be serious. your own sources call it a neighborhood & it does have the settlement position in the opening
08:4908:49, 27 April 2008diffhist−467
Har Homa
none of those sources say it is not a neighborhood, and so your removing that term has no basis
08:4908:49, 27 April 2008diffhist−462
Pisgat Ze'ev
that is dishonest since your own sources call it a neighborhood, which I have pointed out already, and 4-5 people disagree with your changes
09:5509:55, 30 April 2008diffhist−409
Neve Yaakov
and yet Saeb Erekat, ARIJ & Peace Now have no problem saying just that - you've made up a position that they contradict
09:5509:55, 30 April 2008diffhist−741
Gilo
and yet Saeb Erekat, ARIJ & Peace Now have no problem saying just that - you've made up a position that they contradict
09:5309:53, 30 April 2008diffhist−471
Pisgat Ze'ev
not your sources - you are taking a position contradicted by Saeb Erekat, ARIJ & Peace Now, & still deleting information
09:5209:52, 30 April 2008diffhist−138
Har Homa
not your sources - you are taking a position contradicted by Saeb Erekat, ARIJ & Peace Now, & still deleting information
08:5108:51, 29 April 2008diffhist−138
Har Homa
yet you keep removing words you don't like from the lead & no, irrelevent because you are just expanding on one detail of the whole issue
10:0710:07, 27 April 2008diffhist−471
Har Homa
you can't be serious. your own sources call it a neighborhood & it does have the settlement position in the opening
08:4908:49, 27 April 2008diffhist−467
Har Homa
none of those sources say it is not a neighborhood, and so your removing that term has no basis
08:4908:49, 27 April 2008diffhist−462
Pisgat Ze'ev
that is dishonest since your own sources call it a neighborhood, which I have pointed out already, and 4-5 people disagree with your changes