3 September 2013

• 23:14 23:14, 3 September 2013 diff hist −2,202‎ User:Nydas ‎ Quit 5 years ago current
• 23:10 23:10, 3 September 2013 diff hist +224‎ User talk:Martinevans123 ‎ →‎Blacky Pictures Test: new section

2 September 2008

• 17:52 17:52, 2 September 2008 diff hist +311‎ Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dogs ‎ →‎Tamaskan dog: the Utonagan

30 August 2008

• 18:40 18:40, 30 August 2008 diff hist +454‎ Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dogs ‎ Tamaskan dog
• 18:16 18:16, 30 August 2008 diff hist +346‎ Wikipedia:Featured article review/Spoo/archive2 ‎ →‎FARC commentary: remove

25 March 2008

• 09:53 09:53, 25 March 2008 diff hist +195‎ Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) ‎ →‎Wiki is not paper: tautological argument

24 March 2008

• 21:02 21:02, 24 March 2008 diff hist +234‎ Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) ‎ →‎Wiki is not paper: how often?

22 March 2008

• 09:58 09:58, 22 March 2008 diff hist −66‎ Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) ‎ →‎Defining notability for fiction: the use of sales figures and merchandise for notability has never been explained
• 09:49 09:49, 22 March 2008 diff hist +337‎ Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) ‎ →‎Don't institutionalise lists: like WP:MUSIC
• 09:43 09:43, 22 March 2008 diff hist +388‎ Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) ‎ →‎RE: "Depth of coverage" section: sprawling paragraph
• 09:15 09:15, 22 March 2008 diff hist +261‎ Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) ‎ →‎Deleting perfectly good articles is a bad idea: special pleading

21 March 2008

• 15:36 15:36, 21 March 2008 diff hist +698‎ Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) ‎ →‎RE: "Depth of coverage" section: it's a side effect
• 11:11 11:11, 21 March 2008 diff hist +215‎ Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) ‎ →‎Deleting perfectly good articles is a bad idea: IGN, Gamespot, BBC
• 11:01 11:01, 21 March 2008 diff hist +249‎ Talk:Spoo (food) ‎ →‎What a mess: self-published sources
• 10:50 10:50, 21 March 2008 diff hist −1‎ m Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) ‎ →‎Notable topics merit individual articles: removed errant bracket
• 10:50 10:50, 21 March 2008 diff hist −245‎ Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) ‎ →‎Notable topics merit individual articles: removed bizarre dual notability system, unexplained and probably unexplainable
• 10:42 10:42, 21 March 2008 diff hist +565‎ Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) ‎ →‎RE: "Depth of coverage" section: section = license for favouritism

20 March 2008

• 13:22 13:22, 20 March 2008 diff hist +192‎ Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) ‎ →‎RE: "Depth of coverage" section: it's redundant
• 10:02 10:02, 20 March 2008 diff hist −2,243‎ Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) ‎ removed depth of coverage section; unreadable, jargon-laden mixture of the redundant, the obvious and the ambiguous
• 09:44 09:44, 20 March 2008 diff hist +314‎ Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) ‎ →‎Question on how to proceed: the ambiguity
• 09:18 09:18, 20 March 2008 diff hist +443‎ Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) ‎ →‎Deleting perfectly good articles is a bad idea: what makes them unreliable sources?

19 March 2008

• 18:18 18:18, 19 March 2008 diff hist +8‎ Royal Air Force ‎ added fact tag to the 1000 aircraft, seems rather high, even including trainers

18 March 2008

• 22:45 22:45, 18 March 2008 diff hist +167‎ Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) ‎ →‎Deleting perfectly good articles is a bad idea: Gazimoff's submission
• 22:42 22:42, 18 March 2008 diff hist +454‎ Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) ‎ →‎Regarding the PROD suggestion: the instructioncruft could be condensed
• 21:55 21:55, 18 March 2008 diff hist +301‎ Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) ‎ →‎Deleting perfectly good articles is a bad idea: arbitary time limits and google-centric thinking
• 21:23 21:23, 18 March 2008 diff hist +438‎ Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) ‎ →‎Regarding the PROD suggestion: remove this pedantic instructioncruft
• 10:04 10:04, 18 March 2008 diff hist +797‎ Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) ‎ →‎Don't institutionalise lists: pre-conceived notions

17 March 2008

• 19:05 19:05, 17 March 2008 diff hist +238‎ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transistasis (2nd nomination) ‎ delete

16 March 2008

• 11:14 11:14, 16 March 2008 diff hist +230‎ Talk:ESRB re-rating of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion ‎ →‎The intro is the problem: shortened first paragraph
• 11:11 11:11, 16 March 2008 diff hist −170‎ ESRB re-rating of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion ‎ shortened intro
• 10:53 10:53, 16 March 2008 diff hist +301‎ Talk:Spoo (food) ‎ star trek comparison
• 10:35 10:35, 16 March 2008 diff hist +644‎ Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) ‎ →‎Don't institutionalise lists: Richard Hannay example
• 09:43 09:43, 16 March 2008 diff hist −508‎ Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) ‎ →‎Dealing with non-notable fictional topics: removed suggestion to prod; biased against low-traffic fiction articles

14 March 2008

• 22:19 22:19, 14 March 2008 diff hist +551‎ Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) ‎ →‎Don't institutionalise lists: no problem with mcmf stubs

13 March 2008

• 22:24 22:24, 13 March 2008 diff hist +1,165‎ Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) ‎ →‎Don't institutionalise lists: false equality and non-notable principals

12 March 2008

• 14:59 14:59, 12 March 2008 diff hist +120‎ Edinburgh Phrenological Society ‎ added refs to support split paragraph
• 14:45 14:45, 12 March 2008 diff hist +449‎ Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) ‎ don't institutionalise lists
• 13:58 13:58, 12 March 2008 diff hist +229‎ User talk:Joelr31 ‎ →‎FAR and ESRB re-rating of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion: concur

11 March 2008

• 21:53 21:53, 11 March 2008 diff hist +21‎ Edinburgh Phrenological Society ‎ →‎The society: split sentence into two for better reading
• 13:52 13:52, 11 March 2008 diff hist +399‎ Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) ‎ →‎Agree with NTK: obscurantist
• 08:58 08:58, 11 March 2008 diff hist +1,216‎ Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) ‎ →‎Featured article process reformation / Recall of the Featured Article Director: agree with NTK

10 March 2008

• 19:33 19:33, 10 March 2008 diff hist −9‎ ESRB re-rating of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion ‎ →‎Public impact: removed 'at large'
• 19:28 19:28, 10 March 2008 diff hist +444‎ Wikipedia:Featured article review/ESRB re-rating of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion/archive1 ‎ the sources are not very good
• 19:18 19:18, 10 March 2008 diff hist +472‎ Wikipedia:Featured article review/ESRB re-rating of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion/archive1 ‎ →‎ESRB re-rating of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion: not yet satisfied
• 16:21 16:21, 10 March 2008 diff hist +331‎ Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) ‎ →‎Section break - request for clarification: favouritism

9 March 2008

• 19:51 19:51, 9 March 2008 diff hist +26‎ User:Nydas ‎ added a new to do
• 19:50 19:50, 9 March 2008 diff hist −25‎ User:Nydas ‎ update
• 14:50 14:50, 9 March 2008 diff hist −11‎ Cabal ‎ →‎Use in relation to Computers and Usenet: toned down exaggeration
• 13:13 13:13, 9 March 2008 diff hist −92‎ Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) ‎ →‎Dealing with non-notable fictional topics: removed useless sentence
• 13:06 13:06, 9 March 2008 diff hist +175‎ Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction) ‎ →‎When to act: multi-merges