A user with 228 edits. Account created on 28 November 2003.
19 January 2019
- 15:31 15:31, 19 January 2019 diff hist −2 m Voynich manuscript →Parchment, covers, and binding: The page linked to Rene Zandbergen's page but misinterpreted what a bifolio is (it is a pair of joined-together folios)
18 November 2018
- 10:21 10:21, 18 November 2018 diff hist +253 Talk:Single instruction, multiple threads Added section on SIMT
1 February 2018
- 12:00 12:00, 1 February 2018 diff hist −20 m Nick Pelling Removed irrelevant reference to Nick Fielding.
10 September 2017
- 20:55 20:55, 10 September 2017 diff hist +1,094 Talk:Voynich manuscript →Nicholas Gibbs' article in the Times Literary Supplement: Responded to direct question from user "Tisquesusa".
- 20:45 20:45, 10 September 2017 diff hist +347 Talk:Voynich manuscript →Nicholas Gibbs' article in the Times Literary Supplement: Removed Gibbs rebuttal section in main article. There's no hurry to rebut him, so best to wait until someone does it properly (it really won't take long).
- 20:41 20:41, 10 September 2017 diff hist −695 Voynich manuscript Removed rebuttal from Gibbs section, because they were all from blogs. Gibbs himself describes the Latin abbreviations as "idiosyncratic" several times here: https://www.the-tls.co.uk/freedom-books-flowers-moon-september-17/
- 14:18 14:18, 10 September 2017 diff hist +651 Talk:Voynich manuscript →Nicholas Gibbs' article in the Times Literary Supplement: Responded to discussion on "notability".
9 September 2017
- 21:52 21:52, 9 September 2017 diff hist 0 m Talk:Voynich manuscript →Nicholas Gibbs' article in the Times Literary Supplement: fixed typo in talk.
- 21:51 21:51, 9 September 2017 diff hist +585 Talk:Voynich manuscript →Nicholas Gibbs' article in the Times Literary Supplement: I vote for DELETE. And the sooner the better.
- 11:57 11:57, 9 September 2017 diff hist −293 Voynich manuscript Removed another enthusiastic link to Nicholas Gibbs' theory, and reinstated a section heading as "Historical decipherment claims". This Wikipedia page shouldn't be a repository for all single-instance Voynich theory claims, that's not what it is for.
- 08:43 08:43, 9 September 2017 diff hist 0 m Voynich manuscript Fixed typo - Feely's "1934" should have instead read "1943".
- 08:41 08:41, 9 September 2017 diff hist −510 Voynich manuscript Removed the two enthusiastic additional mentions of Nicholas Gibbs added in the last day (particularly in para #1), reverted the original version, but moved it to a new section on Shorthand, in the process removing any explicit suggestion of similarity.
- 08:29 08:29, 9 September 2017 diff hist +302 Talk:Voynich manuscript →Nicholas Gibbs' article in the Times Literary Supplement
8 September 2017
- 13:32 13:32, 8 September 2017 diff hist −13 m Voynich manuscript →Decipherment claims: redundant phrasing, nobody would claim an unsuccessful decipherment, surely?
- 13:30 13:30, 8 September 2017 diff hist −890 Voynich manuscript →Nicholas Gibbs: Gibbs' theory has already been inserted in the article (a little further up), and does not yet warrant an entire section.
- 10:58 10:58, 8 September 2017 diff hist +835 Talk:Voynich manuscript →Nicholas Gibbs' article in the Times Literary Supplement
- 10:48 10:48, 8 September 2017 diff hist +291 Voynich manuscript Undid revision 799464410 by Nandesuka ( talk) I did not write that they were the same, but that they were "similar". Both code-breakers claimed it to be idiosyncratically abbreviated Latin.
7 September 2017
- 21:40 21:40, 7 September 2017 diff hist +291 Voynich manuscript Added quotation from D'Imperio.
- 11:13 11:13, 7 September 2017 diff hist +6 m Voynich manuscript Changed to active tense.
- 08:00 08:00, 7 September 2017 diff hist +85 m Voynich manuscript Added cross reference to Feely's 1934 decryption attempt.
- 07:56 07:56, 7 September 2017 diff hist −209 Voynich manuscript Trimmed recent Nicholas Gibbs Voynich theory down: and there's indeed a strong case for removing it entirely (original research, appearing only in a single article in the TLS).
26 July 2016
- 22:39 22:39, 26 July 2016 diff hist +359 Talk:False writing system →"Artificial"?
5 July 2016
- 19:18 19:18, 5 July 2016 diff hist +221 False writing system Proposed page for deletion - reasons given in Talk page
- 19:17 19:17, 5 July 2016 diff hist −197 m Talk:False writing system Moved PROD to actual article.
- 19:16 19:16, 5 July 2016 diff hist +669 Talk:False writing system Recommended page for deletion.
9 February 2015
- 19:04 19:04, 9 February 2015 diff hist −910 m User talk:Nickpelling Removed more outdated stuff.
- 19:04 19:04, 9 February 2015 diff hist −4,028 User talk:Nickpelling Removed outdated stuff.
- 19:02 19:02, 9 February 2015 diff hist +246 User talk:Nickpelling →Dandy
- 18:58 18:58, 9 February 2015 diff hist −195 Voynich manuscript →External links: Removed link to Sukhwant Singh's pages. Someone used my name for accrediting these links, which was not the case. ~~~~
6 May 2014
- 23:21 23:21, 6 May 2014 diff hist −329 Voynich manuscript →Other theories: Corrected numerous errors in the text.
15 March 2014
- 10:47 10:47, 15 March 2014 diff hist +840 Talk:Nick Pelling →Voynich contributions not notable: Though here's some specific evidence as to why I think they are.
28 February 2014
- 21:52 21:52, 28 February 2014 diff hist +515 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Pelling Added comment on History Today article.
- 21:48 21:48, 28 February 2014 diff hist +216 Talk:Nick Pelling Asked a contributor for more information/
- 21:43 21:43, 28 February 2014 diff hist +191 User talk:Nickpelling →Autobiography warning: Responded by pointing out that I was respectful of Wikipedia policy and had not modified the page in the way that was alleged.
25 February 2014
- 20:19 20:19, 25 February 2014 diff hist +791 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Pelling Added some additional sources possibly germane to the keep/delete debate, both published this week.
17 February 2014
- 21:49 21:49, 17 February 2014 diff hist +678 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Pelling Added links as requested by a Wikipedia editor.
16 February 2014
- 17:34 17:34, 16 February 2014 diff hist +1,260 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Pelling Responded to direct question about the degree of involvement I had making the games in my softography.
11 February 2014
- 21:39 21:39, 11 February 2014 diff hist +482 Talk:Voynich manuscript Response to Spike Wilbury's criticism of Nick Pelling (me) as a supposed authority on the Voynich Manuscript
3 February 2014
- 21:57 21:57, 3 February 2014 diff hist +800 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Pelling Gave response to request for deletion of Nick Pelling page.
22 January 2014
- 14:17 14:17, 22 January 2014 diff hist +591 Talk:Voynich manuscript →A Preliminary Analysis of the Botany, Zoology, and Mineralogy of the Voynich Manuscript by Arthur O. Tucker, Rexford H. Talbert
- 14:07 14:07, 22 January 2014 diff hist −2,286 User talk:Nickpelling →Speedy deletion nomination of Nanodome: Proposed deletion has occurred, so no need to be flagged here.
- 14:07 14:07, 22 January 2014 diff hist −2,364 User talk:Nickpelling →Speedy deletion nomination of Nanodome: Proposed deletion has occurred, so no need to be flagged here.
- 14:05 14:05, 22 January 2014 diff hist −1,845 User talk:Nickpelling →Proposed deletion of Nick Pelling: Proposed deletion criteria from 2012 seem no longer relevant.
8 July 2013
- 22:01 22:01, 8 July 2013 diff hist +490 Talk:Voynich manuscript →"a historical" vs "an historical"
21 May 2013
- 21:28 21:28, 21 May 2013 diff hist +3,371 Talk:Lean startup →Major problems with this "Lean Startup" article: new section
13 March 2013
3 March 2013
- 19:02 19:02, 3 March 2013 diff hist +477 Talk:Voynich manuscript →Scripts: Added references to recent Armenian + Voynich research
- 18:57 18:57, 3 March 2013 diff hist +849 Talk:Voynich manuscript →Thomas Aquinas: commented on why there is a resemblance, but why that resemblance isn't enough to merit inclusion here.
12 July 2012
- 19:35 19:35, 12 July 2012 diff hist −13 m Voynich manuscript →Content: Slight text simplification, plus corrected the number of quires to 18 (because two are apparently missing).
- 19:31 19:31, 12 July 2012 diff hist +22 m Voynich manuscript →Content: Reordered some clauses for clarity.
A user with 228 edits. Account created on 28 November 2003.
19 January 2019
- 15:31 15:31, 19 January 2019 diff hist −2 m Voynich manuscript →Parchment, covers, and binding: The page linked to Rene Zandbergen's page but misinterpreted what a bifolio is (it is a pair of joined-together folios)
18 November 2018
- 10:21 10:21, 18 November 2018 diff hist +253 Talk:Single instruction, multiple threads Added section on SIMT
1 February 2018
- 12:00 12:00, 1 February 2018 diff hist −20 m Nick Pelling Removed irrelevant reference to Nick Fielding.
10 September 2017
- 20:55 20:55, 10 September 2017 diff hist +1,094 Talk:Voynich manuscript →Nicholas Gibbs' article in the Times Literary Supplement: Responded to direct question from user "Tisquesusa".
- 20:45 20:45, 10 September 2017 diff hist +347 Talk:Voynich manuscript →Nicholas Gibbs' article in the Times Literary Supplement: Removed Gibbs rebuttal section in main article. There's no hurry to rebut him, so best to wait until someone does it properly (it really won't take long).
- 20:41 20:41, 10 September 2017 diff hist −695 Voynich manuscript Removed rebuttal from Gibbs section, because they were all from blogs. Gibbs himself describes the Latin abbreviations as "idiosyncratic" several times here: https://www.the-tls.co.uk/freedom-books-flowers-moon-september-17/
- 14:18 14:18, 10 September 2017 diff hist +651 Talk:Voynich manuscript →Nicholas Gibbs' article in the Times Literary Supplement: Responded to discussion on "notability".
9 September 2017
- 21:52 21:52, 9 September 2017 diff hist 0 m Talk:Voynich manuscript →Nicholas Gibbs' article in the Times Literary Supplement: fixed typo in talk.
- 21:51 21:51, 9 September 2017 diff hist +585 Talk:Voynich manuscript →Nicholas Gibbs' article in the Times Literary Supplement: I vote for DELETE. And the sooner the better.
- 11:57 11:57, 9 September 2017 diff hist −293 Voynich manuscript Removed another enthusiastic link to Nicholas Gibbs' theory, and reinstated a section heading as "Historical decipherment claims". This Wikipedia page shouldn't be a repository for all single-instance Voynich theory claims, that's not what it is for.
- 08:43 08:43, 9 September 2017 diff hist 0 m Voynich manuscript Fixed typo - Feely's "1934" should have instead read "1943".
- 08:41 08:41, 9 September 2017 diff hist −510 Voynich manuscript Removed the two enthusiastic additional mentions of Nicholas Gibbs added in the last day (particularly in para #1), reverted the original version, but moved it to a new section on Shorthand, in the process removing any explicit suggestion of similarity.
- 08:29 08:29, 9 September 2017 diff hist +302 Talk:Voynich manuscript →Nicholas Gibbs' article in the Times Literary Supplement
8 September 2017
- 13:32 13:32, 8 September 2017 diff hist −13 m Voynich manuscript →Decipherment claims: redundant phrasing, nobody would claim an unsuccessful decipherment, surely?
- 13:30 13:30, 8 September 2017 diff hist −890 Voynich manuscript →Nicholas Gibbs: Gibbs' theory has already been inserted in the article (a little further up), and does not yet warrant an entire section.
- 10:58 10:58, 8 September 2017 diff hist +835 Talk:Voynich manuscript →Nicholas Gibbs' article in the Times Literary Supplement
- 10:48 10:48, 8 September 2017 diff hist +291 Voynich manuscript Undid revision 799464410 by Nandesuka ( talk) I did not write that they were the same, but that they were "similar". Both code-breakers claimed it to be idiosyncratically abbreviated Latin.
7 September 2017
- 21:40 21:40, 7 September 2017 diff hist +291 Voynich manuscript Added quotation from D'Imperio.
- 11:13 11:13, 7 September 2017 diff hist +6 m Voynich manuscript Changed to active tense.
- 08:00 08:00, 7 September 2017 diff hist +85 m Voynich manuscript Added cross reference to Feely's 1934 decryption attempt.
- 07:56 07:56, 7 September 2017 diff hist −209 Voynich manuscript Trimmed recent Nicholas Gibbs Voynich theory down: and there's indeed a strong case for removing it entirely (original research, appearing only in a single article in the TLS).
26 July 2016
- 22:39 22:39, 26 July 2016 diff hist +359 Talk:False writing system →"Artificial"?
5 July 2016
- 19:18 19:18, 5 July 2016 diff hist +221 False writing system Proposed page for deletion - reasons given in Talk page
- 19:17 19:17, 5 July 2016 diff hist −197 m Talk:False writing system Moved PROD to actual article.
- 19:16 19:16, 5 July 2016 diff hist +669 Talk:False writing system Recommended page for deletion.
9 February 2015
- 19:04 19:04, 9 February 2015 diff hist −910 m User talk:Nickpelling Removed more outdated stuff.
- 19:04 19:04, 9 February 2015 diff hist −4,028 User talk:Nickpelling Removed outdated stuff.
- 19:02 19:02, 9 February 2015 diff hist +246 User talk:Nickpelling →Dandy
- 18:58 18:58, 9 February 2015 diff hist −195 Voynich manuscript →External links: Removed link to Sukhwant Singh's pages. Someone used my name for accrediting these links, which was not the case. ~~~~
6 May 2014
- 23:21 23:21, 6 May 2014 diff hist −329 Voynich manuscript →Other theories: Corrected numerous errors in the text.
15 March 2014
- 10:47 10:47, 15 March 2014 diff hist +840 Talk:Nick Pelling →Voynich contributions not notable: Though here's some specific evidence as to why I think they are.
28 February 2014
- 21:52 21:52, 28 February 2014 diff hist +515 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Pelling Added comment on History Today article.
- 21:48 21:48, 28 February 2014 diff hist +216 Talk:Nick Pelling Asked a contributor for more information/
- 21:43 21:43, 28 February 2014 diff hist +191 User talk:Nickpelling →Autobiography warning: Responded by pointing out that I was respectful of Wikipedia policy and had not modified the page in the way that was alleged.
25 February 2014
- 20:19 20:19, 25 February 2014 diff hist +791 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Pelling Added some additional sources possibly germane to the keep/delete debate, both published this week.
17 February 2014
- 21:49 21:49, 17 February 2014 diff hist +678 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Pelling Added links as requested by a Wikipedia editor.
16 February 2014
- 17:34 17:34, 16 February 2014 diff hist +1,260 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Pelling Responded to direct question about the degree of involvement I had making the games in my softography.
11 February 2014
- 21:39 21:39, 11 February 2014 diff hist +482 Talk:Voynich manuscript Response to Spike Wilbury's criticism of Nick Pelling (me) as a supposed authority on the Voynich Manuscript
3 February 2014
- 21:57 21:57, 3 February 2014 diff hist +800 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Pelling Gave response to request for deletion of Nick Pelling page.
22 January 2014
- 14:17 14:17, 22 January 2014 diff hist +591 Talk:Voynich manuscript →A Preliminary Analysis of the Botany, Zoology, and Mineralogy of the Voynich Manuscript by Arthur O. Tucker, Rexford H. Talbert
- 14:07 14:07, 22 January 2014 diff hist −2,286 User talk:Nickpelling →Speedy deletion nomination of Nanodome: Proposed deletion has occurred, so no need to be flagged here.
- 14:07 14:07, 22 January 2014 diff hist −2,364 User talk:Nickpelling →Speedy deletion nomination of Nanodome: Proposed deletion has occurred, so no need to be flagged here.
- 14:05 14:05, 22 January 2014 diff hist −1,845 User talk:Nickpelling →Proposed deletion of Nick Pelling: Proposed deletion criteria from 2012 seem no longer relevant.
8 July 2013
- 22:01 22:01, 8 July 2013 diff hist +490 Talk:Voynich manuscript →"a historical" vs "an historical"
21 May 2013
- 21:28 21:28, 21 May 2013 diff hist +3,371 Talk:Lean startup →Major problems with this "Lean Startup" article: new section
13 March 2013
3 March 2013
- 19:02 19:02, 3 March 2013 diff hist +477 Talk:Voynich manuscript →Scripts: Added references to recent Armenian + Voynich research
- 18:57 18:57, 3 March 2013 diff hist +849 Talk:Voynich manuscript →Thomas Aquinas: commented on why there is a resemblance, but why that resemblance isn't enough to merit inclusion here.
12 July 2012
- 19:35 19:35, 12 July 2012 diff hist −13 m Voynich manuscript →Content: Slight text simplification, plus corrected the number of quires to 18 (because two are apparently missing).
- 19:31 19:31, 12 July 2012 diff hist +22 m Voynich manuscript →Content: Reordered some clauses for clarity.