22:0622:06, 8 June 2022diffhist−418
Nurse practitioner
Undid revision 1092133677 by
MrOllie (
talk) Reverted biased POV about NPs not being prepared to treat "complex" conditions. 34.2 million Americans have diabetes (https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pdfs/data/statistics) a highly complex condition that NPs are prepared to treat. Removed incorrect reference of 100% acceptance in some Masters of Nursing programs with the inference that all of these programs are nurse practitioner programs.Tags: UndoReverted
04:1604:16, 6 June 2022diffhist−368
Nurse practitioner
Removed "Other nurse practitioner programs have 100% acceptance rates.[13]" as the link https://www.usnews.com/education/best-graduate-schools/the-short-list-grad-school/articles/nursing-masters-programs-with-the-highest-acceptance-rates is not referencing NP programs but acceptance rates of Masters programs. All Masters programs does not mean that they are nurse practitioner programs.Tag: Reverted
03:4003:40, 6 June 2022diffhist−70
Nurse practitioner
Under Quality of Care, Removed "...with virtually all of the studies sponsored by nursing organizations." Inherently false that "virtually all of the studies..." were :"sponsored" by nursing organizations. Where is proof of this? What does "sponsored" even mean?Tag: Reverted
02:4102:41, 6 June 2022diffhist−89
m
Nurse practitioner
removed part of the sentence "but does not provide the depth of expertise needed to recognize more complex conditions" as this is blatantly false about NPs being able to "recognize" more complex conditions. Its biased and untrue.Tag: Reverted
6 January 2020
18:3518:35, 6 January 2020diffhist−28
Nurse practitioner
→Quality of care: the study referenced makes no mention of utilization of nurse practitioners "under physican supervision" increasing access to primary care. In fact, it is quite the opposite. Simply read the study.
22:0622:06, 8 June 2022diffhist−418
Nurse practitioner
Undid revision 1092133677 by
MrOllie (
talk) Reverted biased POV about NPs not being prepared to treat "complex" conditions. 34.2 million Americans have diabetes (https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pdfs/data/statistics) a highly complex condition that NPs are prepared to treat. Removed incorrect reference of 100% acceptance in some Masters of Nursing programs with the inference that all of these programs are nurse practitioner programs.Tags: UndoReverted
04:1604:16, 6 June 2022diffhist−368
Nurse practitioner
Removed "Other nurse practitioner programs have 100% acceptance rates.[13]" as the link https://www.usnews.com/education/best-graduate-schools/the-short-list-grad-school/articles/nursing-masters-programs-with-the-highest-acceptance-rates is not referencing NP programs but acceptance rates of Masters programs. All Masters programs does not mean that they are nurse practitioner programs.Tag: Reverted
03:4003:40, 6 June 2022diffhist−70
Nurse practitioner
Under Quality of Care, Removed "...with virtually all of the studies sponsored by nursing organizations." Inherently false that "virtually all of the studies..." were :"sponsored" by nursing organizations. Where is proof of this? What does "sponsored" even mean?Tag: Reverted
02:4102:41, 6 June 2022diffhist−89
m
Nurse practitioner
removed part of the sentence "but does not provide the depth of expertise needed to recognize more complex conditions" as this is blatantly false about NPs being able to "recognize" more complex conditions. Its biased and untrue.Tag: Reverted
6 January 2020
18:3518:35, 6 January 2020diffhist−28
Nurse practitioner
→Quality of care: the study referenced makes no mention of utilization of nurse practitioners "under physican supervision" increasing access to primary care. In fact, it is quite the opposite. Simply read the study.