A user with 13 edits. Account created on 15 August 2017.
16 August 2017
- 09:11 09:11, 16 August 2017 diff hist −240 Balija dynasties Useless source. Defining caste of 14th century nayaks in 20th century is childish. Eugene imagination completely. Indian government records dint accept this childish comic book Tags: references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 09:08 09:08, 16 August 2017 diff hist −424 Balija →Dynasties: Who is Eugene to define caste of 14th century nayaks in 20th century?His imagination is baseless and not accepted by Indian government records Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 09:06 09:06, 16 August 2017 diff hist +627 User talk:Sitush →Nayaks sources: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 08:59 08:59, 16 August 2017 diff hist −240 Balija dynasties John kelsal dint describe castes of These nayaks in his manual. It is out of imagination of Eugene. There are no caste systems during nayaks period. This is a baseless source. That's y it is not accepted by Indian government records Tags: references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 08:56 08:56, 16 August 2017 diff hist −424 Balija →Dynasties: Absolutely rediculous. Eugene cited john kellsal bellary district manual.no were it is written it is balija. Castes system took place after fall of Vijayanagar empire. Defining a caste way before Vijayanagar kings period need lot of sources Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
15 August 2017
- 14:02 14:02, 15 August 2017 diff hist +298 User talk:Sitush →Balija dynasties: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 13:58 13:58, 15 August 2017 diff hist +239 User talk:Sitush →Balija dynasties: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 13:53 13:53, 15 August 2017 diff hist −1,935 Madurai Nayak dynasty All sources pointed out here were taken from Kaifiat which is not accepted anywer. These theories are not valuable. Hence this sources r not accepted. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 13:49 13:49, 15 August 2017 diff hist −424 Balija →Dynasties: This is not encyclopedic. Kaifiat couldn't be sourced as done by researchers pointed here. Kaifiat r not accepted anywer. Provide another sources Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 13:47 13:47, 15 August 2017 diff hist −240 Balija dynasties Its true Indian government records cannot censor Wikipedia but wiki must be of true facts. Kaifiat r not accepted anywer and all researchers made this as source. Provide another sources Tags: references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 11:44 11:44, 15 August 2017 diff hist −240 Balija dynasties These sources are based on Kaifiat which is not accepted by Indian government Tags: references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 11:43 11:43, 15 August 2017 diff hist −424 Balija →Dynasties: Poor sources!These r based on Kaifiat which is not accepted by Indian government Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 11:40 11:40, 15 August 2017 diff hist −1,935 Madurai Nayak dynasty Poor source.....Kaifiat are not accepted by Indian government Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
A user with 13 edits. Account created on 15 August 2017.
16 August 2017
- 09:11 09:11, 16 August 2017 diff hist −240 Balija dynasties Useless source. Defining caste of 14th century nayaks in 20th century is childish. Eugene imagination completely. Indian government records dint accept this childish comic book Tags: references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 09:08 09:08, 16 August 2017 diff hist −424 Balija →Dynasties: Who is Eugene to define caste of 14th century nayaks in 20th century?His imagination is baseless and not accepted by Indian government records Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 09:06 09:06, 16 August 2017 diff hist +627 User talk:Sitush →Nayaks sources: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 08:59 08:59, 16 August 2017 diff hist −240 Balija dynasties John kelsal dint describe castes of These nayaks in his manual. It is out of imagination of Eugene. There are no caste systems during nayaks period. This is a baseless source. That's y it is not accepted by Indian government records Tags: references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 08:56 08:56, 16 August 2017 diff hist −424 Balija →Dynasties: Absolutely rediculous. Eugene cited john kellsal bellary district manual.no were it is written it is balija. Castes system took place after fall of Vijayanagar empire. Defining a caste way before Vijayanagar kings period need lot of sources Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
15 August 2017
- 14:02 14:02, 15 August 2017 diff hist +298 User talk:Sitush →Balija dynasties: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 13:58 13:58, 15 August 2017 diff hist +239 User talk:Sitush →Balija dynasties: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 13:53 13:53, 15 August 2017 diff hist −1,935 Madurai Nayak dynasty All sources pointed out here were taken from Kaifiat which is not accepted anywer. These theories are not valuable. Hence this sources r not accepted. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 13:49 13:49, 15 August 2017 diff hist −424 Balija →Dynasties: This is not encyclopedic. Kaifiat couldn't be sourced as done by researchers pointed here. Kaifiat r not accepted anywer. Provide another sources Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 13:47 13:47, 15 August 2017 diff hist −240 Balija dynasties Its true Indian government records cannot censor Wikipedia but wiki must be of true facts. Kaifiat r not accepted anywer and all researchers made this as source. Provide another sources Tags: references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 11:44 11:44, 15 August 2017 diff hist −240 Balija dynasties These sources are based on Kaifiat which is not accepted by Indian government Tags: references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 11:43 11:43, 15 August 2017 diff hist −424 Balija →Dynasties: Poor sources!These r based on Kaifiat which is not accepted by Indian government Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 11:40 11:40, 15 August 2017 diff hist −1,935 Madurai Nayak dynasty Poor source.....Kaifiat are not accepted by Indian government Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit