6 September 2022

• 19:55 19:55, 6 September 2022 diff hist +278‎ Talk:Newsmax ‎ →‎Is newsmax a far-right or conservative news outlet?
• 19:46 19:46, 6 September 2022 diff hist +83‎ Talk:Newsmax ‎ →‎Is newsmax a far-right or conservative news outlet?
• 19:38 19:38, 6 September 2022 diff hist +1,706‎ Talk:Newsmax ‎ →‎Is newsmax a far-right or conservative news outlet?

5 February 2022

• 18:41 18:41, 5 February 2022 diff hist −39‎ Newsmax ‎ Undid revision 1069730511 by Valjean ( talk) it is within the mainstream of American right and is full of establishment Republican figures and former Fox ppl. Vast majority of sources indicate as such, and some sources specifically describe it as establishment leaning. Therefore there is definitely not a consensus among sources to use such a description. Tag: Undo

3 February 2022

• 18:44 18:44, 3 February 2022 diff hist −10‎ Newsmax ‎ Undid revision 1069408550 by 69.248.134.158 ( talk) Tag: Undo

25 January 2022

• 20:50 20:50, 25 January 2022 diff hist −175‎ m Newsmax ‎ layout error Tag: Visual edit
• 20:49 20:49, 25 January 2022 diff hist −146‎ Newsmax ‎ Undid revision 1067844933 by Kleuske ( talk) It's not sourced though, and several of the sources contradict it. The sources are clear and "far-right" was added when the sources were surreptitiously removed Tag: Undo

20 December 2021

• 22:21 22:21, 20 December 2021 diff hist −47‎ Newsmax ‎ Don't see how this is an entire section, especially since she posted it to her private twitter page not the Newsmax outlet and Newsmax suspended her afterwards. Tag: Visual edit

21 June 2021

• 17:13 17:13, 21 June 2021 diff hist +578‎ Talk:Newsmax TV ‎ →‎Description of Newsmax TV as "far-right"

16 April 2021

• 15:29 15:29, 16 April 2021 diff hist +19‎ Josh Hawley ‎ small change about professions Tag: Visual edit

29 March 2021

• 14:18 14:18, 29 March 2021 diff hist +30‎ David Wu ‎ change heading to reflect content Tag: Visual edit
• 14:15 14:15, 29 March 2021 diff hist +178‎ David Wu ‎ add reason for resignation from body Tag: Visual edit

22 February 2021

• 22:38 22:38, 22 February 2021 diff hist +1,789‎ Newsmax ‎ Since article was merged with Newsmax Media, moving over TV info Tag: Visual edit
• 22:33 22:33, 22 February 2021 diff hist +107‎ Talk:Newsmax ‎ →‎Proposed merge (Newsmax TV to Newsmax)
• 22:27 22:27, 22 February 2021 diff hist +1,573‎ Newsmax ‎ restore unexplained deletion of a ton of souces and description. Also removed unsupported line that only pertained to someone who worked for newsmax, not newsmax itself. Tag: Visual edit

22 December 2020

• 23:18 23:18, 22 December 2020 diff hist +2‎ Marjorie Taylor Greene ‎ Undid revision 993907650 by KidAd ( talk) this is supported by the sources and literally stated in the following sentences. Tag: Undo

15 December 2020

• 02:43 02:43, 15 December 2020 diff hist +155‎ Talk:Newsmax ‎ →‎Proposed merge (Newsmax TV to Newsmax)

14 December 2020

• 23:24 23:24, 14 December 2020 diff hist +45‎ Newsmax ‎ →‎Coverage of the 2020 United States presidential election Tag: Visual edit
• 23:23 23:23, 14 December 2020 diff hist +452‎ Newsmax ‎ Called the election for Biden following certification of electors today Tag: Visual edit
• 23:18 23:18, 14 December 2020 diff hist +140‎ Talk:Newsmax ‎ →‎Proposed merge (Newsmax TV to Newsmax)

10 December 2020

• 04:46 04:46, 10 December 2020 diff hist +48‎ Talk:Newsmax ‎ →‎Proposed merge to Newsmax
• 04:45 04:45, 10 December 2020 diff hist +1,266‎ Newsmax ‎ transferring some info from the Newsmax Media article since looks like its gonna be merged Tag: Visual edit
• 04:40 04:40, 10 December 2020 diff hist +161‎ Talk:Newsmax ‎ →‎Proposed merge to Newsmax
• 04:40 04:40, 10 December 2020 diff hist +139‎ Talk:Newsmax Media ‎ →‎Proposed merge to Newsmax

6 December 2020

• 20:59 20:59, 6 December 2020 diff hist −41‎ Newsmax ‎ not sure this quote can be attributed as "justification" either, given that the question asked which it responded to wasn't about this. Best to just leave the quote there without other commentary Tag: Visual edit
• 20:57 20:57, 6 December 2020 diff hist −329‎ Newsmax ‎ The source does not give context for this quote and it cannot be supported that Ruddy said this as a "justification" for its coverage. You can't attribute that from the source Tag: Visual edit
• 20:51 20:51, 6 December 2020 diff hist +1‎ Talk:Newsmax ‎ →‎Justification
• 20:51 20:51, 6 December 2020 diff hist +396‎ Talk:Newsmax ‎ →‎Justification
• 20:43 20:43, 6 December 2020 diff hist +76‎ Talk:Newsmax ‎ →‎Justification
• 20:42 20:42, 6 December 2020 diff hist +1‎ Talk:Newsmax ‎ →‎Justification
• 20:41 20:41, 6 December 2020 diff hist +954‎ Talk:Newsmax ‎ →‎Justification

5 December 2020

• 17:21 17:21, 5 December 2020 diff hist −5‎ Newsmax ‎ Undid revision 991648643 by NonReproBlue ( talk) this quote was published in a general discussion, not as a justification for coverage Tags: Undo Reverted

1 December 2020

• 02:33 02:33, 1 December 2020 diff hist +317‎ Newsmax ‎ restore line removed due to bad source, substituted a different source Tag: Visual edit
• 02:27 02:27, 1 December 2020 diff hist −100‎ Newsmax ‎ one quote is enough for the lead Tag: Visual edit
• 02:24 02:24, 1 December 2020 diff hist −20‎ Newsmax ‎ Undid revision 991624242 by Goppingway ( talk) Tag: Undo

30 November 2020

• 23:31 23:31, 30 November 2020 diff hist +1,324‎ The Racial Contract ‎ Undid revision 991088098 by TrevorTMPedia ( talk) i think this was a mistake Tag: Undo

24 November 2020

• 21:47 21:47, 24 November 2020 diff hist +4‎ Stuart Weitzman ‎ →‎Personal life Tag: Visual edit
• 21:29 21:29, 24 November 2020 diff hist −304‎ Newsmax ‎ remove deprecated source Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• 21:24 21:24, 24 November 2020 diff hist +5,396‎ Newsmax ‎ adding a bunch of sources and content Tags: use of deprecated (unreliable) source Visual edit

22 November 2020

• 18:50 18:50, 22 November 2020 diff hist +245‎ Newsmax ‎ →‎History and content: add vanity fair sourcing Tag: Visual edit
• 18:48 18:48, 22 November 2020 diff hist −283‎ Newsmax ‎ →‎Reception: this is WP:Undue as the article isn't even about Newsmax and mentions it once Tag: Visual edit
• 18:41 18:41, 22 November 2020 diff hist +328‎ Newsmax ‎ add new york times source Tag: Visual edit
• 18:41 18:41, 22 November 2020 diff hist −103‎ Newsmax ‎ This is undue, the article only uses that term in passing reference and is not an article about Newsmax, also numerous WP:RS contradict this so it would be undue to put in the lead Tag: Visual edit

19 November 2020

• 20:52 20:52, 19 November 2020 diff hist −185‎ Fox News ‎ this is undue for WP:Lead material as well as WP:Recent Tag: Visual edit

16 November 2020

• 18:32 18:32, 16 November 2020 diff hist −14‎ Newsmax ‎ shorten headline Tag: Visual edit
• 18:32 18:32, 16 November 2020 diff hist −138‎ Newsmax ‎ Undid revision 988947248 by 98.164.9.226 ( talk) Tag: Undo
• 18:27 18:27, 16 November 2020 diff hist +3,677‎ Newsmax ‎ Wall Street Journal acquisition reports +sources Tag: Visual edit
• 16:29 16:29, 16 November 2020 diff hist −458‎ Newsmax TV ‎ information about number of app downloads is not really necessary Tag: Visual edit
• 16:24 16:24, 16 November 2020 diff hist +1,701‎ Christiane Amanpour ‎ add recent event Tag: Visual edit

15 November 2020

• 16:42 16:42, 15 November 2020 diff hist +2,811‎ CNN ‎ Undid revision 977751255 by Aquillion ( talk) Not Undue at all to cover notable events and criticisms supported by WP:RS. If it is bad to have a controversy section, content needs to be integrated instead of completely removed from the article. Currently there is no link at all from this article to the CNN Controversies article. Tags: Undo Reverted