A user with 627 edits. Account created on 17 August 2006.
18 June 2024
- 16:24 16:24, 18 June 2024 diff hist +147 Talk:Luc Montagnier →Other/some: Reply Tag: Reply
- 16:22 16:22, 18 June 2024 diff hist +146 Talk:Luc Montagnier →Other/some: Reply Tag: Reply
13 June 2024
- 15:55 15:55, 13 June 2024 diff hist −1 Luc Montagnier Need to quantity agreement. Please engage with conversation on talk page before reverting. Tag: Reverted
- 15:46 15:46, 13 June 2024 diff hist +583 Talk:Luc Montagnier Quantifying the degree of agreement is improvement to article →Other/some
- 15:34 15:34, 13 June 2024 diff hist −1 Luc Montagnier Hmm, I don't understand what you mean. "Other" seems objectively more vague than "some" by its definition. Please elaborate your position on talk page. Tags: Undo Reverted
12 June 2024
- 03:13 03:13, 12 June 2024 diff hist −1 Luc Montagnier Using "other" here is needlessly vague (I.e. it could mean two or most of them). Do you think the sources say most virologists disagree? If so, should this be changed to "the majority". Tags: Undo Reverted
7 June 2024
- 16:00 16:00, 7 June 2024 diff hist −1 Luc Montagnier Not all other virologists dispute lab leak theory. Tag: Reverted
29 December 2023
- 03:45 03:45, 29 December 2023 diff hist −45 Miss Rwanda Undid revision 1192121639 by Lenschulwitz ( talk) Tag: Undo
27 December 2023
- 18:30 18:30, 27 December 2023 diff hist +45 Miss Rwanda →Titleholders Tag: Reverted
6 December 2023
- 01:44 01:44, 6 December 2023 diff hist −1,752 Kristin Neff No edit summary Tag: Manual revert
4 December 2023
- 23:38 23:38, 4 December 2023 diff hist +261 Kristin Neff →Personal Life: split up with Isaacson Tag: Reverted
- 22:15 22:15, 4 December 2023 diff hist +1,491 Kristin Neff Created personal life section Tag: Reverted
8 November 2023
- 22:06 22:06, 8 November 2023 diff hist +4 Natalie Brunell Wikilink Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
13 September 2023
7 September 2023
- 19:33 19:33, 7 September 2023 diff hist +162 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →primary source
- 19:29 19:29, 7 September 2023 diff hist +206 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →primary source
- 19:24 19:24, 7 September 2023 diff hist +207 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →primary source
- 19:19 19:19, 7 September 2023 diff hist +393 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →primary source
- 19:10 19:10, 7 September 2023 diff hist +327 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →primary source
- 19:03 19:03, 7 September 2023 diff hist +418 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →primary source
- 18:53 18:53, 7 September 2023 diff hist +247 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →primary source
- 17:58 17:58, 7 September 2023 diff hist +866 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →primary source: Should Wikipedians call into question the reliability of the US government with respect to COVID?
30 August 2023
- 18:43 18:43, 30 August 2023 diff hist +132 Counsels of Wisdom →External links: electronic Babylonian Library website isn't presently loading original text, so alternative translation has been provided. current
29 August 2023
- 02:08 02:08, 29 August 2023 diff hist −4 Burning Man →1990 to 1996
23 August 2023
- 20:25 20:25, 23 August 2023 diff hist −260 Kim Jong Un →Early life: Removed German source and the unsupported claim about Un being confused with Chul. Added English source noting Chul as also attending.
10 August 2023
- 21:23 21:23, 10 August 2023 diff hist +591 COVID-19 lab leak theory Undid revision 1169440388 by Andrevan ( talk) The sourced fact is uncontroversial and is not disputed. Official publications by the US gov are generally considered reliable sources. Please explain on talk page if reverting. Tags: Undo Reverted
8 August 2023
- 21:06 21:06, 8 August 2023 diff hist +591 COVID-19 lab leak theory Noted that media downplayed and rejected the lab leak theory as a scientific theory. Tag: Reverted
- 20:02 20:02, 8 August 2023 diff hist +907 Fenbendazole →Toxicity: noted low toxicity and tolerability among various species with human anti cancer potential
- 18:17 18:17, 8 August 2023 diff hist +703 The Epoch Times →Pro-Trump conspiracy theories and disinformation: added additional reference to false flag claim Tag: use of deprecated (unreliable) source
26 May 2023
- 01:08 01:08, 26 May 2023 diff hist −5 Stewart Rhodes The term "Anti-American lawyer" is confusing to readers, McCarthyish, and not found in the sources. Anti-Americanism is a loaded political term, and does not meet the objective criteria expected of Wikipedia (e.g Tag: Undo
25 May 2023
- 23:56 23:56, 25 May 2023 diff hist +123 Stewart Rhodes Undid revision 1157047799 by Arjuna909 ( talk) Reverted as subjective point of views are permitted on Wikipedia if they are attributed as such and based on the reporting of a reliable source. Content enhances article: provides complex (rather than 1-dimensional) portrait of Rhodes. Tag: Undo
- 23:40 23:40, 25 May 2023 diff hist −12 Stewart Rhodes →Personal life and views: removed explicit listing of source. Source balances the allegations of racism with defense from Paul saying he didn't read or write the racist content.
14 April 2023
- 12:31 12:31, 14 April 2023 diff hist +35 Amasa Linked supporting verse regarding Amasa's appointment Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
5 April 2023
- 23:27 23:27, 5 April 2023 diff hist −117 The Journal of John Woolman →Anti-slavery: Removed sentence. Woolman did not fight in the Seven Years War
25 January 2022
- 19:52 19:52, 25 January 2022 diff hist −5 m Megabit No edit summary
- 19:50 19:50, 25 January 2022 diff hist −6 m Megabit No edit summary
- 19:50 19:50, 25 January 2022 diff hist +95 Megabit Distinguished Mb from MB.
23 December 2021
- 19:06 19:06, 23 December 2021 diff hist −582 Immediately invoked function expression →Evaluation context: Removed reference to Herman book example. Unless the reader has access to Herman's book or the example from the book, I don't see how the fact that Herman has an example is helpful to the article.
17 December 2021
- 00:19 00:19, 17 December 2021 diff hist +348 JavaScript syntax →Scoping and hoisting: Clarified variable use (capabilities) with JS hoisting.
16 December 2021
- 21:39 21:39, 16 December 2021 diff hist +471 Scope (computer science) →Function scope: Definition inaccurate and unclear. Clarified and cited with MDN website.
9 December 2021
- 19:57 19:57, 9 December 2021 diff hist +412 Granulomatous amoebic encephalitis →Balamuthia: Provided citation on fatality rate/onset with brain infection.
- 18:03 18:03, 9 December 2021 diff hist −20 m Helium production in the United States Mineral leasing act 1920 date is helpful to readers.
- 18:02 18:02, 9 December 2021 diff hist +4 m Helium production in the United States Wikilinked dirigibles.
- 00:36 00:36, 9 December 2021 diff hist +3 m User talk:Bon courage →Please do not edit war. Instead explain your objections to including NIH Panel recommendations in the article.
- 00:34 00:34, 9 December 2021 diff hist +1,882 User talk:Bon courage Not an accusation of edit wars, but a strong encouragement to explain edits on the talk page rather than reverting and refusing to explain in detail. Asked Robby.is.on to elaborateon his understanding of WP:REVEXP. →Please do not edit war. Instead explain your objections to including NIH Panel recommendations in the article.
8 December 2021
- 23:53 23:53, 8 December 2021 diff hist +1,027 Talk:COVID-19 misinformation Requested that Alexbrn explain his objections to the inclusion of the NIH Panel's scientific review regarding using ivermectin to treat COVID-19.
- 23:53 23:53, 8 December 2021 diff hist +1,067 User talk:Bon courage Requested that Alexbrn refrain from edit wars, and that he instead use the article's talk page.
- 21:03 21:03, 8 December 2021 diff hist +2,497 COVID-19 misinformation 150 words with citations on NIH's guidelines does not seem like "undue detail." Is this the reverting editor's personal viewpoint, or is your revert based on one or more of WP:POLICIES? If so, please cite the specific WP policy of concern and start a thread on the talk page before reverting. Thank you. Undid revision 1059328834 by Alexbrn ( talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
- 20:41 20:41, 8 December 2021 diff hist +2,497 COVID-19 misinformation →Ivermectin: Summarized info from NIH's Covid-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel regarding ivermectin. Tag: Reverted
23 October 2021
- 00:58 00:58, 23 October 2021 diff hist −104 Model–view–controller →Motivation: Removed Richard Pawson book as it doesn't add to MVC article. Tag: Reverted
A user with 627 edits. Account created on 17 August 2006.
18 June 2024
- 16:24 16:24, 18 June 2024 diff hist +147 Talk:Luc Montagnier →Other/some: Reply Tag: Reply
- 16:22 16:22, 18 June 2024 diff hist +146 Talk:Luc Montagnier →Other/some: Reply Tag: Reply
13 June 2024
- 15:55 15:55, 13 June 2024 diff hist −1 Luc Montagnier Need to quantity agreement. Please engage with conversation on talk page before reverting. Tag: Reverted
- 15:46 15:46, 13 June 2024 diff hist +583 Talk:Luc Montagnier Quantifying the degree of agreement is improvement to article →Other/some
- 15:34 15:34, 13 June 2024 diff hist −1 Luc Montagnier Hmm, I don't understand what you mean. "Other" seems objectively more vague than "some" by its definition. Please elaborate your position on talk page. Tags: Undo Reverted
12 June 2024
- 03:13 03:13, 12 June 2024 diff hist −1 Luc Montagnier Using "other" here is needlessly vague (I.e. it could mean two or most of them). Do you think the sources say most virologists disagree? If so, should this be changed to "the majority". Tags: Undo Reverted
7 June 2024
- 16:00 16:00, 7 June 2024 diff hist −1 Luc Montagnier Not all other virologists dispute lab leak theory. Tag: Reverted
29 December 2023
- 03:45 03:45, 29 December 2023 diff hist −45 Miss Rwanda Undid revision 1192121639 by Lenschulwitz ( talk) Tag: Undo
27 December 2023
- 18:30 18:30, 27 December 2023 diff hist +45 Miss Rwanda →Titleholders Tag: Reverted
6 December 2023
- 01:44 01:44, 6 December 2023 diff hist −1,752 Kristin Neff No edit summary Tag: Manual revert
4 December 2023
- 23:38 23:38, 4 December 2023 diff hist +261 Kristin Neff →Personal Life: split up with Isaacson Tag: Reverted
- 22:15 22:15, 4 December 2023 diff hist +1,491 Kristin Neff Created personal life section Tag: Reverted
8 November 2023
- 22:06 22:06, 8 November 2023 diff hist +4 Natalie Brunell Wikilink Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
13 September 2023
7 September 2023
- 19:33 19:33, 7 September 2023 diff hist +162 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →primary source
- 19:29 19:29, 7 September 2023 diff hist +206 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →primary source
- 19:24 19:24, 7 September 2023 diff hist +207 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →primary source
- 19:19 19:19, 7 September 2023 diff hist +393 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →primary source
- 19:10 19:10, 7 September 2023 diff hist +327 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →primary source
- 19:03 19:03, 7 September 2023 diff hist +418 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →primary source
- 18:53 18:53, 7 September 2023 diff hist +247 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →primary source
- 17:58 17:58, 7 September 2023 diff hist +866 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →primary source: Should Wikipedians call into question the reliability of the US government with respect to COVID?
30 August 2023
- 18:43 18:43, 30 August 2023 diff hist +132 Counsels of Wisdom →External links: electronic Babylonian Library website isn't presently loading original text, so alternative translation has been provided. current
29 August 2023
- 02:08 02:08, 29 August 2023 diff hist −4 Burning Man →1990 to 1996
23 August 2023
- 20:25 20:25, 23 August 2023 diff hist −260 Kim Jong Un →Early life: Removed German source and the unsupported claim about Un being confused with Chul. Added English source noting Chul as also attending.
10 August 2023
- 21:23 21:23, 10 August 2023 diff hist +591 COVID-19 lab leak theory Undid revision 1169440388 by Andrevan ( talk) The sourced fact is uncontroversial and is not disputed. Official publications by the US gov are generally considered reliable sources. Please explain on talk page if reverting. Tags: Undo Reverted
8 August 2023
- 21:06 21:06, 8 August 2023 diff hist +591 COVID-19 lab leak theory Noted that media downplayed and rejected the lab leak theory as a scientific theory. Tag: Reverted
- 20:02 20:02, 8 August 2023 diff hist +907 Fenbendazole →Toxicity: noted low toxicity and tolerability among various species with human anti cancer potential
- 18:17 18:17, 8 August 2023 diff hist +703 The Epoch Times →Pro-Trump conspiracy theories and disinformation: added additional reference to false flag claim Tag: use of deprecated (unreliable) source
26 May 2023
- 01:08 01:08, 26 May 2023 diff hist −5 Stewart Rhodes The term "Anti-American lawyer" is confusing to readers, McCarthyish, and not found in the sources. Anti-Americanism is a loaded political term, and does not meet the objective criteria expected of Wikipedia (e.g Tag: Undo
25 May 2023
- 23:56 23:56, 25 May 2023 diff hist +123 Stewart Rhodes Undid revision 1157047799 by Arjuna909 ( talk) Reverted as subjective point of views are permitted on Wikipedia if they are attributed as such and based on the reporting of a reliable source. Content enhances article: provides complex (rather than 1-dimensional) portrait of Rhodes. Tag: Undo
- 23:40 23:40, 25 May 2023 diff hist −12 Stewart Rhodes →Personal life and views: removed explicit listing of source. Source balances the allegations of racism with defense from Paul saying he didn't read or write the racist content.
14 April 2023
- 12:31 12:31, 14 April 2023 diff hist +35 Amasa Linked supporting verse regarding Amasa's appointment Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
5 April 2023
- 23:27 23:27, 5 April 2023 diff hist −117 The Journal of John Woolman →Anti-slavery: Removed sentence. Woolman did not fight in the Seven Years War
25 January 2022
- 19:52 19:52, 25 January 2022 diff hist −5 m Megabit No edit summary
- 19:50 19:50, 25 January 2022 diff hist −6 m Megabit No edit summary
- 19:50 19:50, 25 January 2022 diff hist +95 Megabit Distinguished Mb from MB.
23 December 2021
- 19:06 19:06, 23 December 2021 diff hist −582 Immediately invoked function expression →Evaluation context: Removed reference to Herman book example. Unless the reader has access to Herman's book or the example from the book, I don't see how the fact that Herman has an example is helpful to the article.
17 December 2021
- 00:19 00:19, 17 December 2021 diff hist +348 JavaScript syntax →Scoping and hoisting: Clarified variable use (capabilities) with JS hoisting.
16 December 2021
- 21:39 21:39, 16 December 2021 diff hist +471 Scope (computer science) →Function scope: Definition inaccurate and unclear. Clarified and cited with MDN website.
9 December 2021
- 19:57 19:57, 9 December 2021 diff hist +412 Granulomatous amoebic encephalitis →Balamuthia: Provided citation on fatality rate/onset with brain infection.
- 18:03 18:03, 9 December 2021 diff hist −20 m Helium production in the United States Mineral leasing act 1920 date is helpful to readers.
- 18:02 18:02, 9 December 2021 diff hist +4 m Helium production in the United States Wikilinked dirigibles.
- 00:36 00:36, 9 December 2021 diff hist +3 m User talk:Bon courage →Please do not edit war. Instead explain your objections to including NIH Panel recommendations in the article.
- 00:34 00:34, 9 December 2021 diff hist +1,882 User talk:Bon courage Not an accusation of edit wars, but a strong encouragement to explain edits on the talk page rather than reverting and refusing to explain in detail. Asked Robby.is.on to elaborateon his understanding of WP:REVEXP. →Please do not edit war. Instead explain your objections to including NIH Panel recommendations in the article.
8 December 2021
- 23:53 23:53, 8 December 2021 diff hist +1,027 Talk:COVID-19 misinformation Requested that Alexbrn explain his objections to the inclusion of the NIH Panel's scientific review regarding using ivermectin to treat COVID-19.
- 23:53 23:53, 8 December 2021 diff hist +1,067 User talk:Bon courage Requested that Alexbrn refrain from edit wars, and that he instead use the article's talk page.
- 21:03 21:03, 8 December 2021 diff hist +2,497 COVID-19 misinformation 150 words with citations on NIH's guidelines does not seem like "undue detail." Is this the reverting editor's personal viewpoint, or is your revert based on one or more of WP:POLICIES? If so, please cite the specific WP policy of concern and start a thread on the talk page before reverting. Thank you. Undid revision 1059328834 by Alexbrn ( talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
- 20:41 20:41, 8 December 2021 diff hist +2,497 COVID-19 misinformation →Ivermectin: Summarized info from NIH's Covid-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel regarding ivermectin. Tag: Reverted
23 October 2021
- 00:58 00:58, 23 October 2021 diff hist −104 Model–view–controller →Motivation: Removed Richard Pawson book as it doesn't add to MVC article. Tag: Reverted