21:2921:29, 1 September 2006diffhist+40
Seljuk dynasty
This should be considered vandalism, the reference no:7 cites "they adopted the cultural language of their Persian instructors in Islam. Literary Persian thus spread to the whole of Iran", very clear.
20:1420:14, 1 September 2006diffhist+121
Azerbaijanis
The reference I gave is respectful, and it states that Azebaijanis are a Turkic people, if you revert it without debating, it may be called vandalism...
20:1120:11, 1 September 2006diffhist+26
Seljuk dynasty
I'm not breaking any rules, I'm ready to debate my own thoughts, and I gave my references, and you are not the person who's gonna decide to block or not...
19:5919:59, 1 September 2006diffhist+26
Seljuk dynasty
Encyclopaedia Britannica of course, even if you take a look at the sentence given in the reference section, you can easily understand....
19:0419:04, 1 September 2006diffhist+26
Seljuk dynasty
I don't think so, if you open and read all the sources they gave, you can see that they adopted Persian as the literary and religious language...
16:4416:44, 1 September 2006diffhist+121
Azerbaijanis
I read through all the article as well as the Britannica article, and you're deleting authoritative and respectful sources which is being used in another section of this article, this is vandalism...
16:3516:35, 1 September 2006diffhist+121
Azerbaijanis
All the Turkic speaking peoples are called Turkic peoples, are you trying to fabricate a make-believe history? I repeat, all the peoples of the Middle East is a product of mixture, including Persians.
16:2016:20, 1 September 2006diffhist−2
Azerbaijanis
Turkic speakers are definitely called Turkic people, we shouldn't forget that every people of the Middle East is a product of well mixture without exception, not only Azerbaijanis.
21:2921:29, 1 September 2006diffhist+40
Seljuk dynasty
This should be considered vandalism, the reference no:7 cites "they adopted the cultural language of their Persian instructors in Islam. Literary Persian thus spread to the whole of Iran", very clear.
20:1420:14, 1 September 2006diffhist+121
Azerbaijanis
The reference I gave is respectful, and it states that Azebaijanis are a Turkic people, if you revert it without debating, it may be called vandalism...
20:1120:11, 1 September 2006diffhist+26
Seljuk dynasty
I'm not breaking any rules, I'm ready to debate my own thoughts, and I gave my references, and you are not the person who's gonna decide to block or not...
19:5919:59, 1 September 2006diffhist+26
Seljuk dynasty
Encyclopaedia Britannica of course, even if you take a look at the sentence given in the reference section, you can easily understand....
19:0419:04, 1 September 2006diffhist+26
Seljuk dynasty
I don't think so, if you open and read all the sources they gave, you can see that they adopted Persian as the literary and religious language...
16:4416:44, 1 September 2006diffhist+121
Azerbaijanis
I read through all the article as well as the Britannica article, and you're deleting authoritative and respectful sources which is being used in another section of this article, this is vandalism...
16:3516:35, 1 September 2006diffhist+121
Azerbaijanis
All the Turkic speaking peoples are called Turkic peoples, are you trying to fabricate a make-believe history? I repeat, all the peoples of the Middle East is a product of mixture, including Persians.
16:2016:20, 1 September 2006diffhist−2
Azerbaijanis
Turkic speakers are definitely called Turkic people, we shouldn't forget that every people of the Middle East is a product of well mixture without exception, not only Azerbaijanis.