12:4512:45, 4 February 2021diffhist−60
Hudud
→Quran: Slight changes - false accusation is for sex in general, nothing to do with rape; the Koran doesn't say that the punishments should "only be carried out by a court of law" - it doesn't mention any courts and Islamic law didn't exist at the time of the Koran
12:1812:18, 4 February 2021diffhist−280
Zina
Simplified paragraph which was confusingly organized and repetitive, added key reference, removed older and less relevant references. See talk page
11:5511:55, 4 February 2021diffhist+12
Zina
Restoring the edit that Eperoton reversed. The cited source specifies that witnesses must be male. This is the intro to the article on zina: it doesn't make sense to restrict comments here to one Koran verse, rather than the general concept. The Koran doesn't even define zina, it only exists as a legal concept due to its "elaboration in fiqh"
17:2117:21, 3 February 2021diffhist−92
Islamic views on slavery
→Modern interpretations: Citation is to a brief, unsubstantiated comment in the EI2 article that the Wahhabis of Arabia "up to the present day have vigorously maintained their downright antagonism towards abolition," but this is clearly false, since slavery was abolished in Saudi Arabia in 1962 with the approval of the Wahhabi authoritiesTag: Manual revert
16:0316:03, 3 February 2021diffhist+446
Zina
Undid revision 1001954974 by
Eperoton (
talk) These are not "unsourced" changes. The passages are already sourced, I just changed the wording to make them better reflect the source. E.g. in the first one, the original wording "aside from a few instance, there are no recorded cases" is nonsensicalTag: Undo
12:4512:45, 4 February 2021diffhist−60
Hudud
→Quran: Slight changes - false accusation is for sex in general, nothing to do with rape; the Koran doesn't say that the punishments should "only be carried out by a court of law" - it doesn't mention any courts and Islamic law didn't exist at the time of the Koran
12:1812:18, 4 February 2021diffhist−280
Zina
Simplified paragraph which was confusingly organized and repetitive, added key reference, removed older and less relevant references. See talk page
11:5511:55, 4 February 2021diffhist+12
Zina
Restoring the edit that Eperoton reversed. The cited source specifies that witnesses must be male. This is the intro to the article on zina: it doesn't make sense to restrict comments here to one Koran verse, rather than the general concept. The Koran doesn't even define zina, it only exists as a legal concept due to its "elaboration in fiqh"
17:2117:21, 3 February 2021diffhist−92
Islamic views on slavery
→Modern interpretations: Citation is to a brief, unsubstantiated comment in the EI2 article that the Wahhabis of Arabia "up to the present day have vigorously maintained their downright antagonism towards abolition," but this is clearly false, since slavery was abolished in Saudi Arabia in 1962 with the approval of the Wahhabi authoritiesTag: Manual revert
16:0316:03, 3 February 2021diffhist+446
Zina
Undid revision 1001954974 by
Eperoton (
talk) These are not "unsourced" changes. The passages are already sourced, I just changed the wording to make them better reflect the source. E.g. in the first one, the original wording "aside from a few instance, there are no recorded cases" is nonsensicalTag: Undo