00:2600:26, 18 November 2012diffhist−204
Susham Bedi
added latest writings, and incorporated the entries in the 'recent writings' section (which is now out of date) into the bibliography section.
09:5009:50, 16 November 2008diffhist+40
m
Moksha
→Origins: Again, reinserting language to correctly indicate that this theory about Moksha's origins is speculation only. There is no scholarly consensus.
08:3208:32, 15 November 2008diffhist+63
m
Moksha
I have not touched source material, that is a false claim. I edited the section under "origins" to indicate what your own sources said. 4 or your own 7 sources say this theory is conjecture.
00:2600:26, 18 November 2012diffhist−204
Susham Bedi
added latest writings, and incorporated the entries in the 'recent writings' section (which is now out of date) into the bibliography section.
09:5009:50, 16 November 2008diffhist+40
m
Moksha
→Origins: Again, reinserting language to correctly indicate that this theory about Moksha's origins is speculation only. There is no scholarly consensus.
08:3208:32, 15 November 2008diffhist+63
m
Moksha
I have not touched source material, that is a false claim. I edited the section under "origins" to indicate what your own sources said. 4 or your own 7 sources say this theory is conjecture.