02:4602:46, 14 June 2024diffhist+1
m
Timeline of early HIV/AIDS cases
→1960s: Correcting the erroneous use of ZR59 which is the strain, not the sample. In this case, the article that describes the HIV positive sample itself erroneously refers to it as L70, while based on the methods of the original paper on the study the sample was collected for wasn't a possible designation. LEO70 is the only possible valid designation for the sample.currentTag: Visual edit
02:2802:28, 6 November 2023diffhist−2
m
Timeline of early HIV/AIDS cases
→1950s: Correcting the erroneous use of ZR59 which is the strain, not the sample. In this case, the article that describes the HIV positive sample itself erroneously refers to it as L70, while based on the methods of the original paper on the study the sample was collected for wasn't a possible designation. LEO70 is the only possible valid designation for the sample.Tag: Visual edit
02:4602:46, 14 June 2024diffhist+1
m
Timeline of early HIV/AIDS cases
→1960s: Correcting the erroneous use of ZR59 which is the strain, not the sample. In this case, the article that describes the HIV positive sample itself erroneously refers to it as L70, while based on the methods of the original paper on the study the sample was collected for wasn't a possible designation. LEO70 is the only possible valid designation for the sample.currentTag: Visual edit
02:2802:28, 6 November 2023diffhist−2
m
Timeline of early HIV/AIDS cases
→1950s: Correcting the erroneous use of ZR59 which is the strain, not the sample. In this case, the article that describes the HIV positive sample itself erroneously refers to it as L70, while based on the methods of the original paper on the study the sample was collected for wasn't a possible designation. LEO70 is the only possible valid designation for the sample.Tag: Visual edit