13:4013:40, 13 March 2020diffhist−1,054
m
New eugenics
→History: Once again, deleted an erroneous sentence added by Greyfell, which falsely claims that liberal eugenics is about population-level traits. It is not, as Nick Agar (who originated the concept) makes crystal clear. The editor who keeps reverting back to this false claim should stop.
13:3713:37, 13 March 2020diffhist−972
New eugenics
Deleted a wildly inaccurate sentence at the end of the first paragraph. The sentence claimed that liberal or
02:3902:39, 17 January 2020diffhist+2,124
m
Eugenics
Undid revision 935183599 by
Aquillion (
talk) These sources mention precisely the points they address: Dan Brock rebuts the view that reproductive rights are unlimited. Savulescu et al argue that deliberate genetic modification can and should preserve genetic diversity. And Buchanan et al argue that natural selection does not select for optimal traits, and that deliberate genetic modification can improve upon nature. These add neutralityTag: Undo
13:4013:40, 13 March 2020diffhist−1,054
m
New eugenics
→History: Once again, deleted an erroneous sentence added by Greyfell, which falsely claims that liberal eugenics is about population-level traits. It is not, as Nick Agar (who originated the concept) makes crystal clear. The editor who keeps reverting back to this false claim should stop.
13:3713:37, 13 March 2020diffhist−972
New eugenics
Deleted a wildly inaccurate sentence at the end of the first paragraph. The sentence claimed that liberal or
02:3902:39, 17 January 2020diffhist+2,124
m
Eugenics
Undid revision 935183599 by
Aquillion (
talk) These sources mention precisely the points they address: Dan Brock rebuts the view that reproductive rights are unlimited. Savulescu et al argue that deliberate genetic modification can and should preserve genetic diversity. And Buchanan et al argue that natural selection does not select for optimal traits, and that deliberate genetic modification can improve upon nature. These add neutralityTag: Undo