01:0601:06, 18 March 2020diffhist+642
Mercury poisoning
Undid revision 946090325 by
Doc James (
talk) All explanations given have been invalid. There is no reason to leave this information out of the article. Provide a legitimate reason why it should be omitted, or leave it in.Tag: Undo
00:1600:16, 18 March 2020diffhist+642
Mercury poisoning
Undid revision 946086947 by
DMacks (
talk) All explanations given have been invalid. There is no reason to leave this information out of the article. Provide a legitimate reason why it should be omitted, or leave it in.Tag: Undo
23:1423:14, 17 March 2020diffhist+642
Mercury poisoning
If the conclusion of the study is not a primary source, then none of it is (except the raw data, which is not what my edit is based on). The conclusion is in partial contradiction to the results summary and to the rest of the paper itself, which clearly states that there are measurable neurological differences in those who were exposed to thimerosal in early age. The experience level of editors (one of which is you) is irrelevant to this.Tag: Undo
22:1322:13, 17 March 2020diffhist+642
Mercury poisoning
Undid revision 946072208 by
Velella (
talk) If the conclusion of the study is not a primary source, then none of it is (except the raw data, which is not what my edit is based on). The conclusion is in partial contradiction to the results summary and to the rest of the paper itself, which clearly states that there are measurable neurological differences in those who were exposed to thimerosal in early age.Tag: Undo
21:4521:45, 17 March 2020diffhist+642
Mercury poisoning
Undid revision 945779930 by
Doc James (
talk) Added some words about the conclusion. This is getting a bit wordy... maybe someone could help re-phrase it without making it sound like there are no consequences to exposure to thimerosal.Tag: Undo
01:0601:06, 18 March 2020diffhist+642
Mercury poisoning
Undid revision 946090325 by
Doc James (
talk) All explanations given have been invalid. There is no reason to leave this information out of the article. Provide a legitimate reason why it should be omitted, or leave it in.Tag: Undo
00:1600:16, 18 March 2020diffhist+642
Mercury poisoning
Undid revision 946086947 by
DMacks (
talk) All explanations given have been invalid. There is no reason to leave this information out of the article. Provide a legitimate reason why it should be omitted, or leave it in.Tag: Undo
23:1423:14, 17 March 2020diffhist+642
Mercury poisoning
If the conclusion of the study is not a primary source, then none of it is (except the raw data, which is not what my edit is based on). The conclusion is in partial contradiction to the results summary and to the rest of the paper itself, which clearly states that there are measurable neurological differences in those who were exposed to thimerosal in early age. The experience level of editors (one of which is you) is irrelevant to this.Tag: Undo
22:1322:13, 17 March 2020diffhist+642
Mercury poisoning
Undid revision 946072208 by
Velella (
talk) If the conclusion of the study is not a primary source, then none of it is (except the raw data, which is not what my edit is based on). The conclusion is in partial contradiction to the results summary and to the rest of the paper itself, which clearly states that there are measurable neurological differences in those who were exposed to thimerosal in early age.Tag: Undo
21:4521:45, 17 March 2020diffhist+642
Mercury poisoning
Undid revision 945779930 by
Doc James (
talk) Added some words about the conclusion. This is getting a bit wordy... maybe someone could help re-phrase it without making it sound like there are no consequences to exposure to thimerosal.Tag: Undo